Assessment of the Quality of Movement for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Goal of the work is to verify if there exists a significant difference in the quality of movement measured via virtual reality (VR) technology between two groups of patients diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Grouping is made according to geographic regions; Group 1 is from Zagreb, Group 2 from Vukovar. Another goal of the work is to verify whether there is a significant improvement from initial to final measurements over a one year period in the results of all patients from both groups. Hypothesis: there is no significant difference in the quality of movement between two groups of patients, as obtained through VR tests. The second hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the results of specific VR tests for AIS between initial and final measurements of all the examinee; respectively, the conventional therapy program in both groups doesn’t produce significant results in the direction of improvement. The sample: each group is comprised of 5 patients with AIS diagnosis, between the ages of 12–18, of both genders. The patients have a double scoliotic curve with Cobb value between 37 and 46 degrees, and are being treated with classical physiotherapeutic methods for AIS, at clinics in Zagreb and Vukovar. Methodology: VR tests for assessment of the quality of movement are a part of the System for Diagnosis and Control in Kinesiology (SYDACK) constructed at the Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, as described in the dissertation: VR in physiotherapy of patients with AIS (Filipović, 2011). SYDACK is an original Croatian product, containing 4 VR tests for evaluating the quality of movement: diagonal sliding to the right, diagonal sliding to the left, sliding and hip elevation. Results are analyzed via a t-test for small independent samples and a t-test for small dependent samples. In 93.75% cases there is no significant difference between results of the two groups, as obtained by all 4 VR tests. The analysis shows there is no geographical dependence in the quality of motion with AIS, which confirms the initial hypothesis. In 81.25% cases there is no significant difference in the results of specific VR tests between initial and final measurements. In 18.75% cases there is a significant difference in the direction of improvement.

1. Bunge, E. M., Juttmann, R. E., Van Biezen, F. C., et al. (2008). Estimating the effectiveness of screening for scoliosis: A case-control study. Pediatrics 121, 9–14. CrossRef PubMed

2. Burgoyne, W., Fairbank, J. (2001). The Management of scoliosis. Current Paediatrics 11, 323–331. CrossRef

3. Cheung, J., Halbertsma, J. P. K., Veldhuizen, A. G., et al. (2005). A preliminary study on electromyographic analysis of the paraspinal musculature in idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal 14, 130–137. CrossRef PubMed

4. Dalleau, G., Allard, M. S., Beaulieu, M., et al. (2007). Free moment contribution to quiet standing in able-bodied and scoliotic girls. European Spine Journal 16, 1593–1599. CrossRef PubMed

5. Dickson, R. A. (1999). Spinal deformity – adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(24), 2601–2606. CrossRef PubMed

6. Dickson, R. A. (2004). Spinal deformity – basic principles. Current Orthopaedics 18, 411–425. CrossRef

7. Filipović, V. (2003). Biomehanička analiza lokomocije i posturalnih svojstava kod idiopatskih adolescentnih skolioza. [Biomechanical analysis of locomotion and of postural characteristics in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. In Croatian.] (Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Zagreb). Zagreb: Kineziološki fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

8. Filipović, V. (2011). Virtualna realnost u programu fizioterapije pacijenata s idiopatskom adolescentnom skoliozom. [VR in physiotherapy of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In Croatian.] (Unpublished dissertation, University of Zagreb). Zagreb: Kineziološki fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

9. Filipović, V., Ciliga, D. (2010). Postural adaptation of idiopathic adolescent scolioses (IAS). Kinesiology 42(1), 16–27.

10. Filipović, V., Viskić-Štalec, N., Štalec, et al. (2006). SYDACK – System of Diagnosis and Control in Kinesitherapy. 28th Int. Conf. Information Technology Interfaces ITI 2006, June 19–22, 2006, Cavtat, Croatia. CrossRef

11. Gielen J. L., Van Der Eede, E. (2008). Scoliosis and sports participation. International SportMed Journal 9(3), 131–140.

12. Huynh A.-M., Aubin, C.-E., Rajwani, T., et al. (2007). Pedicle growth asymmetry as a cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. European Spine Journal 16, 523–529. CrossRef PubMed

13. Lehrnert-Schroth, C. (1992). Introduction to the three-dimensional scoliosis treatment according to Schroth. Physiotherapy 78(11), 810–815. CrossRef

14. Lowe, T. G., Edgar, M., Margulies, J. Y., et al. (2000). Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82-A(8), 1157–1168. PubMed

15. Mahaudens, P., Thonnard, J. L., Detrembleur, C. (2005). Influence of structural pelvic disorders during standing and walking in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. The Spine Journal 5, 427–433. CrossRef PubMed

16. Mior, S. A., Kopansky-Giles, D. R., Crowther, E. R., Wrigth, J. G. (1996). A comparison of radiographic and electrogoniometric angles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 21(13): 1549–1555. CrossRef PubMed

17. Negrini, S., Zaina, F., Romano, M., et al. (2008). Specific exercises reduce brace prescription in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective controlled cohort study with worst-case analysis. J Rehabil Med 40, 451–455. CrossRef PubMed

18. Pearsall, D. J., Reid, J. G., Hedden, D. M. (1992). Comparison of three noninvasive methods for measuring scoliosis. Physical Therapy 72(9), 35–44.

19. Schizas, C. G., Kramers-De Quervain, I. A., Stüssi, E., Grob, D. (1998). Gait asymmetries in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using vertical forces measurement only. European Spine Journal 7, 95–98. CrossRef PubMed

20. Stephens Richards, B., Vitale, M. G. (2008). Screening for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. An information statement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90, 195–198. CrossRef PubMed

21. Veldhuizen, A. G., Wever, D. J., Webb, P. J. (2000). The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. European Spine Journal 9, 178–184. CrossRef PubMed

22. Viskić-Štalec, N., Štalec, J., Filipović, V., Vuk, S. (2006). The reliability of the movement measurement quality by SUDIKK system. Suvremena kineziologija. Kupres. PubMed

23. Weinstein, S. L., Dolan, L. A., Cheng, J. C. Y., et al. (2008). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371, 1527–1537. CrossRef

24. Wong, W. Y., Wong, M. S. (2008). Smart garment for trunk posture monitoring: A preliminary study. Scoliosis 3, 7. CrossRef PubMed

25. Zabjek, K. F., Coillard, C., Rivard, C. H., Prince, F. (2008). Estimation of the centre of mass for the study of postural control in idiopathic scoliosis patients: a comparison of two techniques. European Spine Journal 17, 355–360. CrossRef PubMed