Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 1 (2024), 147–158
Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-432/21
Ewa Radecka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.10
published online: 25. 03. 2024
abstract
This article synthetically discusses the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 2 March 2023 in case C-432/21. It aims to familiarise international readers with this issue, which might be a contribution to an academic, international discussion in this field, significant in the era of climate change. The author first indicates the role of forests in climate policy and considers the socio-economic conditions of the current situation of forests in Poland. Then, the international reader will be introduced to the most critical issues related to the judgment that concern the Polish legal order, i.e., forest management and the code of good practices in forests. In the next part, she moves on to the essential elements of the legal basis for the complaint filed by the European Commission against Poland and shows grounds of action and the operative part of the judgment. Then, the most important points of the parties’ arguments were briefly presented. In addition, reference will be made to the legal consequences of issuing the judgment in question.
keywords: environmental law; forest management plans; good practice; access to justice
references (28)
1. ANDREW, R. Figures from Global Carbon Budget 2022 [online]. [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://robbieandrew.github.io/GCB2022/.
2. ASSELT, H. Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law: Forests at the Intersection of the Climate and Biodiversity Regimes. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2012, Vol. 44. No. 4, pp. 1205-1278.
3. BOJAREK-ZIAJA, H. Skarga do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka oraz Skarga do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, 2010.
4. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. In: ipcc [online]. 2021 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/.
5. Commission staff working document, General statistical overview, Accompanying the document, Report from the Commission, Monitoring the application of European Union law, 2021 Annual Report, Brussels, 15.7.2022 SWD(2022) 194 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-04-12]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0194&qid=1658173530287&rid=1.
6. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: New EU Forestry Strategy for 2030, 16.7.2021 COM(2021) 572 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2021, p. 8 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0572.
7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2019, p. 2 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN.
8. CYGAN, A. What is the EU infringement procedure under Article 258 TFEU and how can proceedings be monitored? In: LexisNexis [online]. 19.2.2021 [cit. 2023-11-10]. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/what-is-the-eu-infringement-procedure-under-article-258-tfeu-how-can-proceedings-be-monitored.
9. DANECKA, D. - RADECKI, W. Ustawa o lasach: komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2021.
10. GORMLEY, L. Infringement Proceedings. In: JAKAB, A. - KOCHENOV, D. (eds.). The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States' Compliance Get access Arrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 65-78.
11. HABUDA, A. (ed.). Polskie prawo leśne. Warszawa: Difin, 2016.
12. KASPRZAK, K. Grozi nam masowa wycinka drzew. Przegląd Komunalny. 2017, Nr. 1, pp. 46-47.
13. Klub Przyrodników [online]. 14.11.2017 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: http://www.kp.org.pl/pdf/stanowiska/ktg/2017-11-14_KP%20opinia%20o%20proj%20Wymogow%20dobrej%20praktyki%20gosp%20lesnej.pdf.
14. KÖHL, M. et al. The EU climate package "Fit for 55" - a double-edged sword for Europeans and their forests and timber industry. Forest Policy and Economics. 2021, No. 132, p. 102596. CrossRef
15. ŁACNY, J. Okresowe kary pieniężne, ryczałty i korekty finansowe nakładane na państwa członkowskie za naruszenia prawa UE. Warszawa: Centrum Europejskie Natolin, 2010.
16. Leśne Gospodarstwa Węglowe. In: Projekty rozwojowe Lasów Państwowych [online]. 28.10.2021 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://projekty-rozwojowe.lasy.gov.pl/projekty-rozwojowe/-/asset_publisher/7PcENrBXlBZJ/content/lesne-gospodarstwa-weglowe.
17. Poland: 2021 Annual Report on monitoring the application of EU law. In: European Commission [online]. [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/applying-eu-law/infringement-procedure/2021-annual-report-monitoring-application-eu-law/poland_en.
18. PÓŁTORAK, N. Komentarz do art. 260. In: WRÓBEL, A. et al. (eds.). Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej: komentarz. In: LEX 2012 [online]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2012 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://sip.lex.pl/.
19. Projekt rozporządzenia Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska w sprawie wymagań dobrej praktyki w zakresie gospodarki leśnej. In: Rządowego Centrum Legislacji [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://legislacja.rcl.gov.pl/projekt/12361354/katalog/12890180#12890180.
20. PRZYBOJEWSKA, I. Lasy w kontekście prawnych unormowań ochrony klimatu. Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska. 2023, Nr. 1, pp. 1-29. CrossRef
21. RADECKA, E. Ochrona rezerwatowa w lasach po ostatnich zmianach. Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska. 2018, Nr. 1-2, pp. 81-96.
22. RADECKI, W. Ustawa o lasach: komentarz. Warszawa: Difin, 2017.
23. Rocznik Statystyczny Leśnictwa 2022. In: Główny Urząd Statystyczny [online]. 30.11.2022 [cit. 2023-04-15]. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-lesnictwa-2022,13,5.html.
24. SIKORA, A. Sankcje finansowe w razie niewykonania wyroków Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2011.
25. STĘPKOWSKI, Ł. Odpowiedzialność państw członkowskich z tytułu niewykonania wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości oraz obowiązku odzyskania pomocy państwa. Glosa do wyroku TS z dnia 12 marca 2020 r., C-576/18. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy. 2020, Nr. 9, pp. 34-43.
26. Uwagi KP do projektu rozporządzenia Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska w sprawie wymagań dobrej praktyki w zakresie gospodarki leśnej. In: Klub Przyrodników [online]. 7.11.2022 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://kp.org.pl/pl/urzadzanie-lasu/ogolne-podstawy/3254-uwagi-kp-do-projektu-rozporzadzenia-ministra-klimatu-i-srodowiska-w-sprawie-wymagan-dobrej-praktyki-w-zakresie-gospodarki-lesnej.
27. VIZZARRI, M. et al. Setting the forest reference levels in the European Union: overview and challenges. Carbon Balance and Management. 2021, Vol. 16, No. 23, pp. 1-16. CrossRef
28. WYROK TRYBUNAŁU (druga izba) z dnia 2 marca 2023 r., spis treści. In: InfoCuria: Judikatura [online]. [cit. 2023-04-10]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=A17A32D653927428139B3B9B3443C81B?text=&docid=270827&pageIndex=0&doclang=pl&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=7766664.
Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-432/21 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
