AUC IURIDICA
AUC IURIDICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.

As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.

AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.

Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).

The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.

In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.

AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.

The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.

Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.

AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 1 (2024), 147–158

Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-432/21

Ewa Radecka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.10
published online: 25. 03. 2024

abstract

This article synthetically discusses the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 2 March 2023 in case C-432/21. It aims to familiarise international readers with this issue, which might be a contribution to an academic, international discussion in this field, significant in the era of climate change. The author first indicates the role of forests in climate policy and considers the socio-economic conditions of the current situation of forests in Poland. Then, the international reader will be introduced to the most critical issues related to the judgment that concern the Polish legal order, i.e., forest management and the code of good practices in forests. In the next part, she moves on to the essential elements of the legal basis for the complaint filed by the European Commission against Poland and shows grounds of action and the operative part of the judgment. Then, the most important points of the parties’ arguments were briefly presented. In addition, reference will be made to the legal consequences of issuing the judgment in question.

keywords: environmental law; forest management plans; good practice; access to justice

references (28)

1. ANDREW, R. Figures from Global Carbon Budget 2022 [online]. [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://robbieandrew.github.io/GCB2022/.

2. ASSELT, H. Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law: Forests at the Intersection of the Climate and Biodiversity Regimes. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2012, Vol. 44. No. 4, pp. 1205-1278.

3. BOJAREK-ZIAJA, H. Skarga do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka oraz Skarga do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, 2010.

4. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis. In: ipcc [online]. 2021 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/.

5. Commission staff working document, General statistical overview, Accompanying the document, Report from the Commission, Monitoring the application of European Union law, 2021 Annual Report, Brussels, 15.7.2022 SWD(2022) 194 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-04-12]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0194&qid=1658173530287&rid=1.

6. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: New EU Forestry Strategy for 2030, 16.7.2021 COM(2021) 572 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2021, p. 8 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0572.

7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union law [online]. 2019, p. 2 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN.

8. CYGAN, A. What is the EU infringement procedure under Article 258 TFEU and how can proceedings be monitored? In: LexisNexis [online]. 19.2.2021 [cit. 2023-11-10]. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/what-is-the-eu-infringement-procedure-under-article-258-tfeu-how-can-proceedings-be-monitored.

9. DANECKA, D. - RADECKI, W. Ustawa o lasach: komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2021.

10. GORMLEY, L. Infringement Proceedings. In: JAKAB, A. - KOCHENOV, D. (eds.). The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States' Compliance Get access Arrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 65-78.

11. HABUDA, A. (ed.). Polskie prawo leśne. Warszawa: Difin, 2016.

12. KASPRZAK, K. Grozi nam masowa wycinka drzew. Przegląd Komunalny. 2017, Nr. 1, pp. 46-47.

13. Klub Przyrodników [online]. 14.11.2017 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: http://www.kp.org.pl/pdf/stanowiska/ktg/2017-11-14_KP%20opinia%20o%20proj%20Wymogow%20dobrej%20praktyki%20gosp%20lesnej.pdf.

14. KÖHL, M. et al. The EU climate package "Fit for 55" - a double-edged sword for Europeans and their forests and timber industry. Forest Policy and Economics. 2021, No. 132, p. 102596. CrossRef

15. ŁACNY, J. Okresowe kary pieniężne, ryczałty i korekty finansowe nakładane na państwa członkowskie za naruszenia prawa UE. Warszawa: Centrum Europejskie Natolin, 2010.

16. Leśne Gospodarstwa Węglowe. In: Projekty rozwojowe Lasów Państwowych [online]. 28.10.2021 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://projekty-rozwojowe.lasy.gov.pl/projekty-rozwojowe/-/asset_publisher/7PcENrBXlBZJ/content/lesne-gospodarstwa-weglowe.

17. Poland: 2021 Annual Report on monitoring the application of EU law. In: European Commission [online]. [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/applying-eu-law/infringement-procedure/2021-annual-report-monitoring-application-eu-law/poland_en.

18. PÓŁTORAK, N. Komentarz do art. 260. In: WRÓBEL, A. et al. (eds.). Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej: komentarz. In: LEX 2012 [online]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2012 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://sip.lex.pl/.

19. Projekt rozporządzenia Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska w sprawie wymagań dobrej praktyki w zakresie gospodarki leśnej. In: Rządowego Centrum Legislacji [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://legislacja.rcl.gov.pl/projekt/12361354/katalog/12890180#12890180.

20. PRZYBOJEWSKA, I. Lasy w kontekście prawnych unormowań ochrony klimatu. Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska. 2023, Nr. 1, pp. 1-29. CrossRef

21. RADECKA, E. Ochrona rezerwatowa w lasach po ostatnich zmianach. Prawne Problemy Górnictwa i Ochrony Środowiska. 2018, Nr. 1-2, pp. 81-96.

22. RADECKI, W. Ustawa o lasach: komentarz. Warszawa: Difin, 2017.

23. Rocznik Statystyczny Leśnictwa 2022. In: Główny Urząd Statystyczny [online]. 30.11.2022 [cit. 2023-04-15]. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-lesnictwa-2022,13,5.html.

24. SIKORA, A. Sankcje finansowe w razie niewykonania wyroków Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2011.

25. STĘPKOWSKI, Ł. Odpowiedzialność państw członkowskich z tytułu niewykonania wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości oraz obowiązku odzyskania pomocy państwa. Glosa do wyroku TS z dnia 12 marca 2020 r., C-576/18. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy. 2020, Nr. 9, pp. 34-43.

26. Uwagi KP do projektu rozporządzenia Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska w sprawie wymagań dobrej praktyki w zakresie gospodarki leśnej. In: Klub Przyrodników [online]. 7.11.2022 [cit. 2023-04-11]. Available at: https://kp.org.pl/pl/urzadzanie-lasu/ogolne-podstawy/3254-uwagi-kp-do-projektu-rozporzadzenia-ministra-klimatu-i-srodowiska-w-sprawie-wymagan-dobrej-praktyki-w-zakresie-gospodarki-lesnej.

27. VIZZARRI, M. et al. Setting the forest reference levels in the European Union: overview and challenges. Carbon Balance and Management. 2021, Vol. 16, No. 23, pp. 1-16. CrossRef

28. WYROK TRYBUNAŁU (druga izba) z dnia 2 marca 2023 r., spis treści. In: InfoCuria: Judikatura [online]. [cit. 2023-04-10]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=A17A32D653927428139B3B9B3443C81B?text=&docid=270827&pageIndex=0&doclang=pl&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=7766664.

Creative Commons License
Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-432/21 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478

Download