Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 1 (2024), 111–130
Climate Litigation in Europe: a Discussion about Emerging Trends in the Context of Principle of Non-regression
Elif Naz Němec, Milan Damohorský
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.8
published online: 25. 03. 2024
abstract
The climate crisis is one of the most serious problems that humankind has ever faced. With the adverse consequences of this phenomenon, new practices have emerged in social, economic, and legal structures. One of these new practices is doubtlessly climate litigation that aim to pressure states to fulfil their positive obligations concerning the mitigation of the human-induced climate crisis. Global warming, advancing at an unprecedented rate, is pushing governments to take immediate measures and shape their legislation accordingly. Within this movement, the principle of non-regression, rooted in human rights, has gained a tangible form in environmental law. This study explores the potential role of the climate crisis and, specifically, the climate litigation cases in Europe in establishing the principle of non-regression as a settled principle in environmental law. It discusses its value as an argument in climate litigation from a practical point of view.
keywords: climate change; climate litigation; principle of non-regression; Paris Agreement; mitigation
references (55)
1. A.S. & S.A. & E.N.B v. Presidency of Türkiye & The Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/as-sa-enb-v-presidency-of-turkiye-the-ministry-of-environment-urbanization-and-climate-change/.
2. AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. In: ippc [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/.
3. BALOUNOVÁ, E. Mezinárodní klimatické právo: současné výzvy (nejen) pro Mezinárodní soudní dvůr. Mezinárodní politika - Diplomacie klimatické krize. 2023, No. 2, pp. 20-22.
4. BALOUNOVÁ, E. - SNOPKOVÁ, T. Český klimatický zákon - nutnost nebo…? České právo životního prostředí. 2023, Vol. XXIII, No. 1, pp. 13-40.
5. Commune de Grande-Synthe v. France. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2021 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/commune-de-grande-synthe-v-france/.
6. COP 28: UN Climate Change Conference: 30 November - 12 December, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. In: United Nations: Climate Change [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://unfccc.int/.
7. Česká pirátská strana. Zákon o ochraně klimatu (klimatický zákon) [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.pirati.cz/documents/324/Klimatick%C3%BD-z%C3%A1kon_navrh-listopad.pdf.
8. Declic et al. v. The Romanian Government. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/declic-et-al-v-the-romanian-government/.
9. DUTHEILLET DE LAMOTHE, L. Principe de non-régression. Revue juridique de l'environnement. 2018, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 187-194. CrossRef
10. Emma Johanna Kiehm, et al. v. State of Brandenburg. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/emma-johanna-kiehm-et-al-v-state-of-brandenburg/.
11. FALKNER, R. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs. 2016, Vol. 92, No. 5, pp. 1107-1125. CrossRef
12. Friends of the Irish Environment v. Ireland. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2019 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/friends-of-the-irish-environment-v-ireland/.
13. GANESAN, P. Challenging Regression in Climate Commitments: Doctrine of 'Non-Retrogression' to the Rescue? In: Oxford Human Rights Hub [online]. 4.1.2022 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/challenging-regression-in-climate-commitments-doctrine-of-non-retrogression-to-the-rescue/.
14. Genç iklim aktivistleri, Erdoğan'a dava açtı. In: bianet [online]. 5.10.2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://bianet.org/haber/genc-iklim-aktivistleri-erdogan-a-dava-acti-278463.
15. Greenpeace v. Spain I. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 20.6.2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/greenpeace-v-spain/.
16. Greenpeace v. Spain II. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/greenpeace-v-spain-ii/.
17. CHATURVEDI, E. Climate Change Litigation: Indian Perspective. German Law Journal. 2021, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 1459-1470. CrossRef
18. Children of Austria v. Austria. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/children-of-austria-v-austria/.
19. ILEMİN ALAN, N. Uluslararası Çevre Hukukunda Geriye Gidilemezlik İlkesinin Yeri. Periodicum Iuris. 2023, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 29-47.
20. In re Federal Climate Protection Act Austria. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 27.6.2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/in-re-federal-climate-protection-act-austria/.
21. In re Václav Havel Airport Expansion. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 24.6.2020 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/in-re-vaclav-havel-airport-expansion/.
22. International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) - IUCN Commission on Environmental Law (CEL). Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development: implementing sustainability. In: IUCN Library System [online]. 2015 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46647.
23. Klimatická Žaloba ČR. In: Klimatická žaloba ČR [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.klimazaloba.cz/.
24. KNAPP, V. Teorie práva. Prague: C. H. Beck, 1995.
25. KUH, K. F. The Law of Climate Change Mitigation: an Overview. In: DELLASALA, D. A. - GOLDSTEIN, M. I. (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Elsevier, 2018, Vol. 2, pp. 505-510. CrossRef
26. Kuruyan Marmara Gölü'nde tarım başladı. In: TRT HABER [online]. 7.1.2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.trthaber.com/foto-galeri/kuruyan-marmara-golunde-tarim-basladi/53043.html.
27. LAVRIK, M. Customary Norms, General Principles of International Environmental Law, and Assisted Migration as a Tool for Biodiversity Adaptation to Climate Change. Jus Cogens [online]. 2022, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 99-129 [cit. 2023-12-29]. CrossRef
28. MITCHELL, A. D. - MUNRO, J. An International Law Principle of Non-Regression from Environmental Protections. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2023, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 35-71. CrossRef
29. MITCHELL, A. D. - MUNRO, J. No Retreat: an Emerging Principle of Non-Regression from Environmental Protections in International Investment Law. Georgetown Journal of International Law. 2019, Vol. 50.
30. Mr. Justice MacGrath. Friends of the Irish Environment CLG and The Govenrment of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General [online]. 2019 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/non-us-case-documents/2019/20190919_2017-No.-793-JR_judgment-2.pdf.
31. Notre Affaire à Tous and Others v. France. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 14.10.2021 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/notre-affaire-a-tous-and-others-v-france/.
32. National Green Tribunal. Society for Protection of Environment & Biodiversity v Union of India. In: CASEMINE [online]. 8.12.2017 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/non-us-case-documents/2017/20171208_Application-No.-677of-2016-M.A.-No.-148-of-2017_decision.pdf.
33. Neubauer, et al. v Germany. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2021 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/neubauer-et-al-v-germany/.
34. Paris Agreement - UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. In: EUR-Lex: Access to European Union Law [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/paris-agreement/paris-agreement.html.
35. PRIEUR, M. Chapter 18: Non-regression. In: AGUILA, Y. - VIÑUALES, J. E. (eds). A Global Pact for the Environment - Legal Foundations [online]. University of Cambridge, CEENRG, 2019, p. 143 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://globalpactenvironment.org/uploads/Aguila-Vinuales-A-Global-Pact-for-the-Environment-Cambridge-Report-March-2019.pdf.
36. PRIEUR, M. The principle of non-regression. In: Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, p. 251 [cit. 2023-12-29]. CrossRef
37. PRIEUR, M. - MAINGUY, G. Non-regression in environmental law. S.A.P.I.EN.S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society [online]. 2012, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 35-38 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1405.
38. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu ze dne 20. 2. 2023, č. j. 9 As 116/2022-166 [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.klimazaloba.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/rozhodnuti_9-as-116-2022-166.pdf.
39. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze ze dne 15. 6. 2022, č. j. 14 A 101/2021-248 [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.klimazaloba.cz/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ROZSUDEK.pdf.
40. Rozsudek Městského soudu v Praze ze dne 25. 10. 2023, č. j. 14 A 101/2021-445 [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.klimazaloba.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/MS-v-Praze_Rozsudek_14-A-101-2021-445_201123.pdf.
41. S.S. Gölmarmara ve Çevresi Su Ürünleri Kooperatifi v. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Manisa Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 28.10.2023 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/ss-golmarmara-ve-cevresi-su-urunleri-kooperatifi-v-republic-of-turkiye-ministry-of-agriculture-and-forestry-manisa-directorate-of-provincial-agriculture-and-forestry/.
42. STANKOVIC, T. - HOVI, J. - SKODVIN, T. The Paris Agreement's inherent tension between ambition and compliance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023, Vol. 10, No. 1, Art. 550. CrossRef
43. The General Assembly of the United Nations. Future We Want - Outcome document. In: Sustainable Development: Knowledge Platform [online]. 2012 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/futurewewant.html.
44. The principle of non-regression and Indian Environmental Jurisprudence. In: Bar and Bench [online]. 26.7.2018 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.barandbench.com/columns/the-principle-non-regression-indian-environmental-jurisprudence.
45. The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation [online]. 2018 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/non-us-case-documents/2018/20181009_2015-HAZA-C0900456689_decision-4.pdf.
46. Türkiye'nin ilk iklim davası Marmara Gölü balıkçıları adına açıldı. In: bianet [online]. 24.3.2022 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://bianet.org/haber/turkiye-nin-ilk-iklim-davasi-marmara-golu-balikcilari-adina-acildi-259497.
47. United Nations. The Convention on Biological Diversity. In: Convention on Biological Diversity [online]. 1992 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/.
48. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In: United Nations [online]. [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
49. UN General Assembly (76TH SESS.: 2021-2022). The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. In: United Nations: Digital Library [online]. 2022 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3983329.
50. United Nations Secretary-General. Gaps in International Environmental Law and Environment-related Instruments: Towards a Global Pact for the Environment - Report of the Secretary-General. In: UN: environment programme [online]. 2018 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.11822/27070.
51. Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2015 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/urgenda-foundation-v-kingdom-of-the-netherlands/.
52. VOIGT, C. The power of the Paris Agreement in international climate litigation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. 2023, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 237-249. CrossRef
53. VORDERMAYER-RIEMER, M. Non-Regression in International Environmental Law: Human Rights Doctrine and the Promises of Comparative International Law. Cambridge - Antwerp - Chicago: Intersentia, 2020. CrossRef
54. VZW Klimaatzaak v. Kingdom of Belgium & Others. In: Climate Change Litigation Databases [online]. 2014 [cit. 2023-12-29]. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/vzw-klimaatzaak-v-kingdom-of-belgium-et-al/.
55. WARWICK, B. T. C. Unwinding Retrogression: Examining the Practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2019, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 467-490. CrossRef
Climate Litigation in Europe: a Discussion about Emerging Trends in the Context of Principle of Non-regression is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
