Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 61 No 3 (2015), 155–170
Zrod a utváření principu proporcionality v poválečném německém ústavním právu
[The Birth and Formation of the Proportionality Principle in the Post-War German Constitutional Law]
Pavel Ondřejek
published online: 08. 12. 2015
abstract
The principle of proportionality which emerged in post-war German jurisprudence and case-law of German courts followed some older theories and ideas, such as the necessity principle known from the Prussian administrative law since the 18th century or German school of legal sociology. The main impetus for the development of contemporary form of the proportionality principle is described by the author of this article as post-war German constitutional doctrine with its conception of a constitution as an “objective order of values”. This idea of constitution is connected with fundamental rights protection and material, not only formal, conception of state governed by law. Due to the broad protection of fundamental rights there was necessary to elaborate a method of finding constitutional limits of these rights in a democratic society. The main reasons for the formation of the doctrine of proportionality were theories of direct binding force of constitution and of its unity. The main aim of this article is to illustrate that the principle of proportionality was not formed in the German constitutional law in one moment. Namely in the 1960th there existed various alternative conceptions to the proportionality principle (the article mentions prohibition of over-inclusive regulation – Übermaßverbot – by Peter Lerche and the principle of practical concordance – praktische Konkordanz – by Konrad Hesse). The principle of proportionality became due to the gradual formation in case-law of German courts – in particular the Federal Constitutional Court – one of the most important method of contemporary constitutional argumentation. It is however relatively modern principle, in comparison with conceptions such as democracy, sovereignty or rule of law. Despite this fact it is in my opinion important to deal with the circumstances of its birth and reasons for its wide application in the German constitutional law.
keywords: human rights; principle of proportionality; practical concordance; constitutional argumentation; post-war German constitutional law lidská práva; princip proporcionality; praktická konkordance; ústavněprávní argumentace; poválečné německé ústavní právo
Zrod a utváření principu proporcionality v poválečném německém ústavním právu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478