Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 60 No 3 (2014), 69–75
Koordinace sociálního zabezpečení ve vztahu k občanům třetích států – jsme si rovni?
[Coordination of Social Security in Relation to Third-Country-Nationals – Are We Equal?]
Kristina Koldinská
published online: 28. 01. 2015
abstract
Coordination of Social Security in Relation to Third-Country-Nationals – Are We Equal? The paper tries to answer a fundamental question about equality from the point of view of third-country-nationals and their social rights. It looks not only into coordination regulations, but also into free movement rules. Basic recent case-law of CJEU and ECHR is presented and discussed, whereas some proposals for changes are deduced from conclusions of the respective courts. The author concludes, that coordination rules as such are hardly missusable by third-country-nationals and that in current situation in the world, with consequences for Europe, there is probably a right time to change the European attitude towards immigrants, including a re-thinking of their social rights.
keywords: the coordination of social security; social security; the principle of equal treatment; third country nationals; social rights koordinace sociálního zabezpečení; sociální zabezpečení; princip rovnosti; občané třetích států; sociální práva
Koordinace sociálního zabezpečení ve vztahu k občanům třetích států – jsme si rovni? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
