Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 59 No 4 (2013), 265–282
Integrační předpisy v rakouském ústavním systému
Aleksandra Kustra
published online: 29. 01. 2015
abstract
Constitutional Regulation of the EU Membership in Austria The present elaboration analyzes the constitutional regulation of Austria’s membership in the EU. Austrian legal system has quite specific system of the sources of constitutional law. Austrian constitution in the material (non-formal) sense has been formed not only by the Constitutional Act of 1920, but by a number of other legal acts and even by individual provisions contained in the laws that have gained constitutional status. Because of this specificity of Austrian system of sources of law, constitutional provisions regarding european are very complex. The integration provisions in Austrian constitution (in broad meaning) are: provisions of Federal Constitutional Law on the accession of Austria to the EU enacted on May 5th 1994, provisions of the Title B, article 9 paragraph 2 and article 50 of Constitutional Act of 1920 and finally provisions of other acts of constitutional status as well as certain provisions of ordinary legislation with constitutional status which regulate the Austrian membership in the EU. Article 9 paragraph 2 of the Constitutional Act of 1920 was meant to act as the so-called Integrationshebel. However, finally adopted wording of this provision jeopardized this goal, since is does not permit to transfer competences of states (Länder). Therefore the Title B of the Constitution of Austria had to be introduced. It has enabled the accession to the EU and regulated Austrian membership in the EU. Originally the Title B contained six provisions, but subsequent ratifications of reform treaties required amendments of the original text. Currently Title B contains eleven extremely detailed and complex articles (Articles 23a–23k). Casuistry of this regulation results from the above mentioned peculiarity of Austrian system of sources of law and the federal regime of the country. The consequence of extensive constitutional regulation is the lack of controversies regarding the primacy of EU law in Austrian legal system. This has been confirmed by the case law of the Austrian Constitutional Tribunal, which has also consistently emphasized that it is national courts’ task to apply and ensure EU law in accordance with the principles of the founding treaties and the jurisprudence of the ECJ. With regard to the controversial issue of the constitutional review of the EU law, it should be noted that in 2008 an amendment of Article 50 of the Constitutional Act of 1920 was introduced, which provided for the possibility of constitutional review of the changing treaties. The Austrian Constitutional Tribunal has also examined the constitutionality of national legislation implementing the EU law (mainly directives). However, there is no legal basis to review the secondary legislation of the EU.
keywords: constitution; integration provisions; EU law; Austria; constitutional court; judicial review; EU Membership; accession; sources of law ústava; integrační ustanovení; evropské právo; Rakousko; ústavní soud; kontrola ústavnosti; členství v EU; přistoupení; prameny práva
Integrační předpisy v rakouském ústavním systému is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478