Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 59 No 4 (2013), 153–164
Ke dvěma interpretačním problémům euronovel jednacího řádu Poslanecké sněmovny (institut vyjádření Poslanecké sněmovny, institut projednání nominací)
Martin Kavěna, Eva Tetourová
published online: 29. 01. 2015
abstract
The EU Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies and Two Issues for Interpretation (the Notion of “a Representation of the Chamber of Deputies” and the Question of Deliberation of EU Staff Nominations) The first part of the article deals with the theoretical question of whether the Constitution of the Czech Republic and the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies allow the plenary of the Chamber of Deputies to revoke a resolution of the Committee for European Affairs which had been adopted in relation to proposed EU legislation (where the Rules of Procedure provide for the existence of a legal fiction that such a committee resolution is, under certain circumstances, considered to be a representation of the Chamber of Deputies as a whole). This is particularly important in relation to the yellow and orange flag procedures in EU law in relation to alleged breaches of the principle of subsidiarity.The second part of the article deals with the powers of the Chamber of Deputies to deliberate staff nominations to European Union bodies. The theoretical part is devoted to the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies and problematic issues. Following this, the article describes the application of these provisions using the example of the deliberation of the nomination of the candidate for General Court judge by the Committee for European Affairs, which took place in November 2012. The article further describes the procedure preceding the discussion in the Chamber of Deputies and the procedure which follows, including the response of the European Union and future prospects.
keywords: Constitution; Rules of Procedure; Subsidiarity; Staff nominations; European Union; Constitutional Court; art. 255 TFEU Ústava; jednací řád; subsidiarita; personální nominace; Evropská unie; Ústavní soud; čl. 255 SFEU
Ke dvěma interpretačním problémům euronovel jednacího řádu Poslanecké sněmovny (institut vyjádření Poslanecké sněmovny, institut projednání nominací) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
