PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE
PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE

Právněhistorické studie / Legal History Studies (Charles University journal; below referred to as PHS or Journal) is a scientific journal listed in the international prestigious database SCOPUS. The journal is published by Charles University in Prague under the guarantee of the Department of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It is published by the Karolinum Press. The journal focuses on the field of legal history and related topics.

Issue 1 of the Journal was published by the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences Publishing in June 1955. The Journal was initially published by the Cabinet of Legal History of the Czechoslovak Academy of Science (CSAV), later by the Institute of State and Law (CSAV) and then by the Institute of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University.

PHS is issued three times a year in April, August, and December and it presents original scientific works/papers as well as reviews, annotations and news from the scientific field of legal history. It also introduces annotated texts of a legal history nature. PHS accepts manuscripts from domestic as well as foreign authors. Manuscripts submitted by foreign authors are published in original language, namely in English, Slovak, German, French, Italian or Polish.

PHS (ISSN 0079-4929) is registered in the Czech national ISSN centre (supervised by the State Technical Library). The Journal is registered by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic according to Act No. 46/2000 Sb., on Rights and Liabilities for the Publishing of Periodicals and Change of Some Acts (Press Act), and it is allocated with registration number of periodical press MK E 18813.

PHS is an open journal and ensures open access to scientific data (Open Access). The entire content is released as open to the public on the web pages of the journal.

The journal is archived in Portico.

PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE, Vol 56 No 2 (2026), 247–263

Article

Crimen maiestatis: Symbolism and Ritual Protection of Authority in Roman Criminal Law

Marie Neumann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689X.2026.560
published online: 06. 10. 2026

abstract

This article focuses on the development of the crime of high treason throughout the era of the Roman Empire, focusing on symbolism and ritual protection of authority in Roman criminal law. Using legal sources and historical cases, it illustrates the changes of this offence, with an emphasis on the changing perceptions of authority. The article draws on legal sources, especially the Code of Justinian and Theodosius and the Digest of Justinian, but also on non-legal sources, especially the work of Titus Livy, as well as other ancient historians. Furthermore, the article works with a variety of domestic and foreign secondary sources, especially monographs and scholarly articles.

keywords: Roman criminal law; high Treason; Roman Empire; protection of Authority

references (30)

1. Ab urbe condita, cited from LIVIUS, T. Livius Dějiny I. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1979; LIVIUS, T. Livius Dějiny II-III. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1972; LIVIUS, T. Livius Dějiny V. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1975; LIVIUS, T. Livius Dějiny VII. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1979.

2. Annales, cited from TACITUS, P. C. Tacitovy Letopisy. Bibliotéka klassikův řeckých a římských. Tacitovy dějiny. Praha: E. Grégr, 1872.

3. BARTOŠEK, M. Dějiny římského práva ve třech fázích jeho vývoje. Praha: Academia, 1988.

4. BARTOŠEK, M. Encyklopedie římského práva. 2. přepracované vydání, Praha: Academia, 1994.

5. BAUMAN, R. A. Impietas in principem; a study of treason against the Roman emperor with special reference to the first century A.D., München: C. H. Beck, 1974., citováno podle MELOUNOVÁ, M. Crimen maiestatis and the poena legis during the Principate. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 2014, Vol. 54, No. 4. CrossRef

6. BAUMAN, R. A. The duumviri in the Roman criminal law and in the Horatius legend. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1969.

7. BAUMAN, R. A. The Lex Valeria de provocatione of 300 B.C. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1973, Jhrg. 22, Nr. 1.

8. Bellum Catilinae, cited from: SALLUSTIUS, G. C. Válka proti Katilinovi. Praha: Kober, 1914.

9. Codex Iustinianus, cited from: FRIER, B. W. - CONNOLLY, S. - CORCORAN, S. - CRAWFORD, M. - DILLON, J. N. et al. (ed.). The Codex of Justinian: a new annotated translation, with parallel Latin and Greek text. Volume 1, Introductory matter and book I-III. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-521-19682-6.

10. Codex Theodosianus, cited from: PHARR, C. - PHARR, M. B. - SHERRER DAVIDSON, T. The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions. Corpus of Roman Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952.

11. COOLEY, A. E. The Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre: text, translation, and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. CrossRef

12. Corpus Iuris Civilis, cited from: MOMMSEN, T. - KRUEGER, P. Corpus Iuris Civilis. Vol. I. Berolini: Weidmannos, 1928.

13. Digesta seu Pandactae Libri 47-48, cited from SCOTT, S. P. The Digest or Pandects of Justinian, Cincinnati, 1932.

14. CHILTON, C. W. The Roman Law of Treason under the Early Principate. The Journal of Roman Studies. 1955, Vol. 45. CrossRef

15. JONES, T. Germanicus. In: PAGAN, V. E. (ed.). The Tacitus encyclopedia. Volume I. Chicester: Wiley Blackwell, 2023.

16. KIERDORF, W. Die Einleitung Des Piso-Prozesses (Tac. Ann. 3,10). Hermes, 1969, Jhrg. 97, Nr. 2.

17. KINCL, J. - SKŘEJPEK, M. - URFUS, V. Římské právo. Praha: C.H. Beck, 1995.

18. KOŁODKO, P. Ustawodawstwo rzymskie w sprawach karnych: Od ustawy XII Tablic do dyktatury Sulli. Białystok: Temida 2, 2012.

19. LEVICK, B. M. Poena Legis Maiestatis. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte. 1979, Jhrg. 28, Nr. 3.

20. Ottův slovník naučný: illustrovaná encyklopaedie obecných vědomostí. V Praze: J. Otto, 1897. sv. 11.

21. Ottův slovník naučný: illustrovaná encyklopaedie obecných vědomostí. V Praze: J. Otto, 1907, sv. 26.

22. ROGERS, R. S. A Tacitean Pattern in Narrating Treason-Trials. Online. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 1952, Vol. 83. CrossRef

23. ROGERS, R. S. Criminal Trials and Criminal Legislation under Tiberius. Middletown: American Philological Association, 1935.

24. RUTLEDGE, S. H. Delatores and the Tradition of Violence in Roman Oratory. The American Journal of Philology, 1999, Vol. 120, No. 4. CrossRef

25. SANTALUCIA, B. Studi di diritto penale romano. Roma: L'Erma di Bretschneider, 1994.

26. SC de Cn. Pisone patre, cited from COOLEY, A. E. The Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre: text, translation, and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.

27. SKŘEJPEK, M. Prameny římského práva: Fontes iuris romani. Vyd. 2., Praha: LexisNexis, 2004.

28. SKŘEJPEK, M. Ius et religio: právo a náboženství ve starověkém Římě. Pelhřimov: Vydavatelství 999, 1999.

29. ŠLOSAR, M. Některé aspekty zrodu antického Říma. In: MASLEN, M. - MASÁROVÁ, Ľ. (ed.). 2018. Legitímne očakávania, transparentnosť verejnej správy a zneužívanie práv v aplikačnej praxi v právnom štáte: Zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie "Právny štát - medzi vedou a umením", ako súčasti medzinárodného vedeckého kongresu Trnavské právnické dni, 20.-21. septembra 2018. Trnava: Právnická fakulta TU v Trnave, 2018. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.

30. ŠMEJKALOVÁ, M. Perduellio a sacrilegium v době římské republiky. Právněhistorické studie, 2023, Vol. 53, No. 1. CrossRef

Creative Commons License
Crimen maiestatis: Symbolism and Ritual Protection of Authority in Roman Criminal Law is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

170 x 240 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 250 czk
ISSN: 0079-4929
E-ISSN: 2464-689X

Download