Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 5 No 2 (2013), 125–136
Pořadový krok jako disciplinační technika těla
[The Cadenced Step as the Disciplinary Technique of the Body]
Petr Wohlmuth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2014.25
published online: 03. 04. 2014
abstract
This text inquires into the problem of cadenced step as the disciplinary technique of the body, according to theories of Marcel Mauss and Michel Foucault. Author explores historical core of military body techniques in social context, developed by Dutch army reformers Counts of Nassau during 1590s and refined by the Prussian military in 1740s. Author interprets cadenced step inside framework of shifting paradigm of power, as Foucault analyses the sequence of three stages of power emerging during european Early modernity.
keywords: historical sociology; military history; military revolution; techniques of the body; cadenced step
references (18)
1. Dreyfus, Hubert L. – Rabinow, Paul [2002]. Michel Foucualt. Za hranicemi strukturalismu a hermeneutiky. Praha: Herrmann & synové.
2. Duffy, Christopher [1987]. Military Experience in the Age of Reason. New York: Routledge & Keagan Paul.
3. Duffy, Christopher [1974]. The Army of Frederick the Great. New York: Hippocrene Books.
4. Duffy, Christopher [1977]. The Army of Maria Theresa. Vancouver – London: David & Charles.
5. Foucault, Michel [2000]. Dohlížet a trestat. Praha: Dauphin.
6. Fournier, Marcel [2006]. Marcel Mauss: A Biography. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press.
7. Giffart, Pierre [1696]. L'Art Militaire Francois pour L'Infanterie. Paříž: Pierre Giffart.
8. Gheyn, Jacob de (ed.) – David J. Blackmore [1986]. The Renaissance Drill Book. London: Greeenhill Books.
9. Halpin, Edward – Trevorrow, Phillippa – Webb, David – Wright, Steve (ed.) [2006]. Cyberwar, Netwar and the Revolution in Military Affairs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Lockhart, Paul [2008]. The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army. New York: Smithsonian.
11. Maleševič, Siniša [2010]. The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
12. Mauss, Marcel [1992]. Techniques of the Body. In. Crary, Jonathan – Kwinter, Sanford (ed.). Incorporations. New York: Zone.
13. McNeill, William H. [1995]. Keeping together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge – Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
14. Neill, Donald A. [1998]. Ancestral Voices: The Influence of the Ancients on the Military Thought od the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. The Journal of Military History 62 (3), s. 494–540. CrossRef
15. Nimwegen, Olaf van [2010]. The Dutch Army the The Military Revolutions. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
16. Parker, Geoffrey [2007]. The Limits to Revolutions in Military Affairs: Maurice of Nassau, the Battle of Nieuwpoort (1600) and the Legacy. The Journal of Military History 71 (2), s. 333–390. CrossRef
17. Steuben, Friedrich Wilhelm von. [1807]. Steuben Regulations for the Order and Discipline of the Troops of the United States. Boston: William Pelham.
18. Tinková, Daniela [2007]. Biomoc a "politická anatomie lidského a společenského těla". Foucaultův concept "biomoci" ve vztahu k otázce modernizace státu, zrození humanitních věd a medikalizace společnosti na přelomu 18. a 19. století. In. Storchová, Lucie (ed.). Conditio humana – konstanta či historická proměnná? Koncepty historické antropologie a teoretická reflexe v současné historiografii. Ústí nad Labem: Albis International, s. 115–139.
Pořadový krok jako disciplinační technika těla is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
