Pausing and tempo variation as strategies in signalling poetic structure

This study investigates how prosodic features reflect information structure and poetic organization during oral poetry performance. Specifically, we examined how repetition and structural position influence articulation rate (AR) and pause duration in spoken verse. Thirty-two native Czech speakers read three structurally comparable poems aloud, each differing in the presence and distribution of repeated lines. Poem 1 served as a baseline, containing no repetition; Poem 2 included a fully repeated final stanza; and Poem 3 featured repeated distichs within each stanza. Results showed that repeated lines (given information) were delivered at faster and more consistent rates than non-repeated lines (new information). Across poems with repetition, a gradual tempo decline followed by a tempo reset was observed, suggesting a strategic use of tempo modulation to signal textual recurrence. Additionally, pause duration reliably marked structural boundaries, with the longest pauses at stanza breaks. Discrepancies between syllabic and phonemic AR further highlighted the influence of phonotactic variability. Overall, the findings demonstrate that speakers intentionally manipulate prosodic timing to convey both informational and structural cues, enhancing listener comprehension of poetic form.

1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. CrossRef

2. Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (pp. 199-202). CrossRef

3. Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1990). Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 101-112. CrossRef

4. Eefting, W. (1991). The effect of 'information value' and 'accentuation' on the duration of Dutch words, syllables and segments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 412-424. CrossRef

5. Firbas, J. (1979). A functional view of 'ordo naturalis'. Brno studies in English, 13(1), 29-59.

6. Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of 'new' and 'old' words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489-504. CrossRef

7. Chafe, W. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111-133. CrossRef

8. Lenth, R. (2022). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R package version 1.8.2]. Available at <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans>.

9. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the productions and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172-187. CrossRef

10. Nooteboom, S. G., & Eefting, W. (1994). Evidence for the adaptive nature of speech on the phrase level and below. Phonetica, 51, 92-98. CrossRef

11. Paschen, L., Fuchs S., & Seifart, F. (2022). Final lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 94, Art. 101179. CrossRef

12. Pfitzinger, H. R. (1998). Local speech rate as a combination of syllable and phone rate. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998), Art. 0523. CrossRef

13. Quené, H. (2005). Modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2005 (pp. 2457-2460). CrossRef

14. R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program, version 4.2.1]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at <https://www.R-project.org>.

15. Straková, L. (2023). Variabilita vybraných akustických vlastností nazál při recitaci básně [Unpublished B.A. thesis]. Charles University, Faculty of Arts.

16. Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme: A study in thematic elements, their contextual ties, thematic progressions and scene progressions based on a text from Aelfric. Univerzita J. E. Purkyně.

17. Šturm, P., & Bičan, A. (2021). Slabika a její hranice v češtině. Karolinum.

18. Šturm, P., & Volín, J. (2023). Occurrence and duration of pauses in relation to speech tempo and structural organization in two speech genres. Languages, 8(1), Art. 23. CrossRef

19. Trouvain, J., Koreman, J., Erriquez, A., & Braun, B. (2001). Articulation rate measures and their relation to phone classification in spontaneous and read German speech. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptation Methods for Speech Recognition (pp. 155-158).

20. Vavřičková, B. (2023). Variabilita trvání vokalických intervalů při recitaci básně [Unpublished B.A. thesis]. Charles University, Faculty of Arts.

21. Veroňková-Janíková, J. (2004). Dependence of individual speaking rate on speech task. AUC Philologica, 2004(1), 79-95.

22. Volín, J., Šturm, P., Skarnitzl, R., & Bořil, T. (2024). Prosodic phrase in spoken Czech. Karolinum. CrossRef

23. Volín, J. (2022). Variation in speech tempo and its relationship to prosodic boundary occurrence in two speech genres. AUC Philologica, 2022(1), 65-81. CrossRef

24. Werner, R., Trouvain, J., & Möbius, B. (2022). Optionality and variability of speech pauses in read speech across languages and rates. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022 (pp. 312-316). CrossRef

25. Zellner, B. (1994). Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In E. Keller (ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition (pp. 41-62). John Wiley & Sons.