AUC Philologica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica) is an academic journal published by Charles University. It publishes scholarly articles in a large number of disciplines (English, German, Greek and Latin, Oriental, Romance and Slavonic studies, as well as in phonetics and translation studies), both on linguistic and on literary and cultural topics. Apart from articles it publishes reviews of new academic books or special issues of academic journals.
The journal is indexed in CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO, and ERIH PLUS.
AUC PHILOLOGICA, Vol 2017 No 4 (2017), 85–96
Parable as a Tool of Philosophical Persuasion: Yùyán 寓言 in the Zhuangzi in the Context of Late Warring States Period Chinese Literature
Marcin Jacoby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.42
published online: 21. 03. 2018
abstract
Yùyán is an important part of the legacy of pre-Qin Chinese literature, and is widely used in persuasive texts of the late Warring States Period. These narratives closely resemble Western parables, especially of the New Testament tradition. The author discusses in detail the history and uses of the term yùyán, and its definitions and interpretations in modern Chinese research, concluding that ‘parable’ seems the closest English-language equivalent of yùyán. The famous philosophical work Zhuāngzǐ is central in this discussion. The author discusses the persuasive function of the parables in Zhuāngzǐ, and points to several distinct features of these narratives compared to other works of the period. These include wide occurrence of purely imaginative texts in a quasi-mythological setting, structural complexity, and the intriguing ‘self-portrait’ of the legendary Zhuāng Zhōu. As such, parables in Zhuāngzǐ should be treated as a distinct group within the wider parable tradition of China, retaining the original name of yùyán.
keywords: Zhuangzi; yuyan; parable; fable; persuasion; pre-Qin literature; Warring States Period literature
references (17)
1. Bartnicki, Roman (2010). "Współczesna interpretacja przypowieści Jezusa Chrystusa" [Modern Interpretation of Jesus Christ Parables]. Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne XXIII.2, 225–240.
2. Černušková, Veronika (2016). "Four Desires: Clement of Alexandria and the Sermon on the Mount." In: Cernuskova, Veronika et al. (edd.), Clement's Biblical Exegesis: Proceedings of the Second Colloquium on Clement of Alexandria (Olomouc, May 29–31, 2014). Internet resource. CrossRef
3. Cháng Sēn 常森 (2005). Xiān-Qín wénxué zhuāntí jiǎngyì 先秦文學專題講義 [Lectures on Pre-Qin Literature Topics]. Tàiyuán: Shānxī jiàoyù chūbǎnshè.
4. Chén Púqīng 陳蒲清 (1992). Yùyán wénxué lǐlùn. Lìshǐ yǔ yìngyòng 寓言文學理論. 歷史與應用 [Literary theory of the yùyán. History and usage]. Táiběi: Luòtuo chūbǎnshè.
5. Chén Púqīng 陳蒲清 (1987). Zhōngguó gǔdài yùyán shǐ 中國古代寓言史 [History of Classical Chinese Parable]. Bǎnqiáo: Luòtuo chūbǎnshè.
6. Crump, James Irving (1996). Chan-kuo Ts'e. Translated and Annotated and with an Introduction by J. I. Crump. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan. CrossRef
7. Czerski, Janusz (1993). "Przypowieści Chrystusa jako gatunek literacki" [Christ Parables as a Literary Genre]. In: Colloqium Salutis. Wrocławskie Studia Teologiczne 25, 209–230. (Accesible at http://www.dbc.wroc.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=8318&from=publication)
8. Domaradzki, Mikołaj (2013). Filozofia antyczna wobec problemu interpretacji. Rozwój alegorezy od przedsokratyków do Arystotelesa [The Problem of Interpretation of Ancient Philosophy: from Pre-Socratics to Aristotle]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu (Accessible at https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/bitstream/10593/6484/1/mikolaj_domaradzki.pdf)
9. Gōng Mù 公木 (1984). Xiān-Qín yùyán gàilùn 先秦寓言概論 [Outline of the Pre-Qín Parable]. Jǐnán: Qílǔ shūshè.
10. Lǐ Fùxuān 李富軒 and Lǐ Yàn 李燕 (1998). Zhōngguó gǔdài yùyán shǐ 中國古代寓言史 [History of Classical Chinese Parable]. Xīndiàn: Hànwēi chūbǎnshè.
11. Lín Wénqǐ 林文錡 (2006). "Xiān-Qín yùyán de wénběn xíngtài jí qí shěnměi jiégòu" 先秦寓言的文體形態及其審美結構 [Literary Form of the Pre-Qin Parable and Its Aesthetic Composition]. Fúzhōu dàxué xuébào, zhéxué shèhuì kēxué bǎn 74, 55–62.
12. Mair, Victor H. (1998). Wandering on the Way. Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
13. Níng Xī 凝溪 (1992). Zhōngguó yùyán wénxué shǐ 中國寓言文學史 [[Literary History of the Chinese Parable]. Kūnmíng: Yúnnán rénmín chūbǎnshè.
14. Ráo Lóngsǔn 饒龍隼 (2001). Xiān-Qín zhūzǐ yǔ Zhōngguó wénxué 先秦諸子與中國文學 [Pre-Qín Thinkers and Chinese Literature]. Nánchāng: Bǎihuāzhōu wényì chūbǎnshè.
15. Świderkówna, Anna (2006). Rozmowy o biblii. Opowieści i przypowieści [Bible Talks. Tales and Parables]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
16. Wáng Huànbiāo 王焕鑣 1962. Xiān-Qín yùyán yánjiū 先秦寓言研究 [Research on Pre-Qín Parables]. Běijīng: Zhōnghuá shūjú.
17. Zimmermann, Ruben (2009). "How to understand the parables of Jesus. A paradigm shift in parable exegesis." Acta Theologica 29.1, 157–182. (Accessible at http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1015-87582009000100009) CrossRef
Parable as a Tool of Philosophical Persuasion: Yùyán 寓言 in the Zhuangzi in the Context of Late Warring States Period Chinese Literature is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk
ISSN: 0567-8269
E-ISSN: 2464-6830
