AUC Philologica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica) is an academic journal published by Charles University. It publishes scholarly articles in a large number of disciplines (English, German, Greek and Latin, Oriental, Romance and Slavonic studies, as well as in phonetics and translation studies), both on linguistic and on literary and cultural topics. Apart from articles it publishes reviews of new academic books or special issues of academic journals.
The journal is indexed in CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO, and ERIH PLUS.
AUC PHILOLOGICA, Vol 2016 No 3 (2016), 141–160
La concordancia del verbo con el objeto como fenómeno complejo
[The verb-object agreement as a complex phenomenon]
Kateřina Ziková
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2016.41
published online: 11. 11. 2016
abstract
In this work, the pronominal reduplication in Spanish is interpreted as an agreement of the verb with the object by means of a clitic. In this way, the object resembles the subject, which agrees with the verb by means of an affix, hence the suggestion of the attributes implicit and explicit for the object. However, while the subject-verb agreement is absolutely regular, the agreement of the object is conditioned by diverse factors. These factors are the main object of investigation in this work. Finally, we present the concept of accessibility and suggest that it unites all the factors of the object-verb agreement under one main principle.
keywords: pronominal reduplication; agreement; implicit object; explicit object; accessibility
references (14)
1. Ariza, M. (2013): La preposición A de objeto: Teorias y panorama. Lexis, 13.2, pp. 203-222.
2. Barrenechea, A. M. – Orecchia, T. (1979): La duplicación de objetos directos e indirectos en el espa-ol hablado en Buenos Aires. In: A. M. Barrenechea (ed.), Estudios lingüísticos y dialectológicos: temas hispánicos. Buenos Aires: Hachette, pp. 73-101.
3. Belloro, V. A. (2007): Spanish Clitic Doubling: a Study of the Syntax-Pragmatic Interface. Buffalo. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo. [online]. [cit. 2012-03-17]. Accesible en: <http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/vanvalin/rrg/Belloro-Spanish_Clitic_Doubling.pdf>.
4. Company Company, C. (2002): Reanálisis en cadena y gramaticalización: Dativos problemáticos en la historia del espa-ol. Verba, 29, pp. 31-69.
5. Fernández-Ordó-ez, I. (1999): Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In: I. Bosque – V. Demonte (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua espa-ola. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, vol. I, pp. 1317-1397.
6. Fernández Soriano, O. (1993): Los pronombres átonos. Madrid: Taurus.
7. García-Miguel, J. M. (1991): La duplicación de complemento directo e indirecto como concordancia. Verba, 18, pp. 375–410.
8. García-Miguel, J. M. – Vázquez Rozas, V. (1994): Lingüística de corpus y lingüística descriptiva: el caso de la duplicación de objetos. Boletín de la Sociedad Espa-ola para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 14, pp. 47–62. [online]. [cit. 2012-03-17]. Accesible en: <http://www.sepln.org/revistaSEPLN/revista/14/14-Pag47.pdf>.
9. Jiménez Juliá, T. (1996): Eje temático y tema en espa-ol. In: M. Casado Velarde (ed.), Scripta philologica in memoriam Manuel Taboada Cid. Servicio de Publicaciones Universidade da Coru-a, pp. 453-492.
10. Vázquez Rozas, V. (1995): El complemento indirecto en espa-ol. Santiago de Compostela: USC.
11. Vázquez Rozas, V. – García Salido, M. (2012): A discourse-based analysis of object clitic doubling in Spanish. In: K. Davidse – T. Breban – L. Brems – T. Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 269-296.
12. Zavadil, B. – Čermák, P. (2010): Mluvnice současné španělštiny: lingvisticky interpretační přístup. Praha: Karolinum.
13. <b>Base de datos</b>
14. http://adesse.uvigo.es
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk
ISSN: 0567-8269
E-ISSN: 2464-6830
