AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA
AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica (AUC Kinanthropologica) is an international peer reviewed journal for the publication of research outcomes in the humanities, the social sciences and the natural sciences, as applied to kinathropology. It is a multidisciplinary journal accepting only original unpublished articles in English in the various sub-disciplines and related fields of kinanthropology, such as Anthropology, Anthropomotorics, Sports Pedagogy, Sociology of Sport, Philosophy of Sport, History of Sport, Physiology of Sport And Exercise, Physical Education, Applied Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Human Biomechanics, Psychology of Sport, Sports Training and Coaching, Sport Management, etc. The journal also welcomes interdisciplinary articles. The journal also includes reports of relevant activities and reviews of relevant publications.

The journal is abstracted and indexed by CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, SPOLIT, SPORTDiscus, and Ulrichsweb.

AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA, Vol 60 No 1 (2024), 5–17

The relationship between multidimensional social support and well-being in disability sport

Dorly Idelson, Fatemeh Dehghan, Jeffrey Martin, Adam Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2024.1
published online: 22. 10. 2024

abstract

In this study, we investigated the relationships among perceived social support, perceived available support in sport, team cohesion, grit, sport engagement, and life satisfaction among disability sport athletes. Twenty-four athletes from Israel and Belgium, aged 22 to 65, 87.5% male (n = 24) and 12.5% female (n = 3), with physical disabilities participated. The results showed significant positive correlations between team cohesion and sport engagement (r = 0.44, p < 0.05) and life satisfaction (r = 0.57, p < 0.01). Team cohesion was also linked to perceived social support (r = 0.55, p < 0.01). Finally, grit and sport engagement (r = 0.50, p < 0.01) and perceived social support and sport engagement (r = 0.50, p < 0.05) were correlated. These findings underscore the importance of supportive social environments inside and outside of sport in potentially enhancing athlete well-being.

keywords: multidimensional social support; disability sport; sport psychology; athlete support system

references (57)

1. Achour, M., & Nor, M. R. M. (2014). The effects of social support and resilience on life satisfaction of secondary school students. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 4(1), 12-20.

2. Atkinson, F., & Martin, J. (2020). Gritty, hardy, resilient, and socially supported: A replication study. Disability and Health Journal, 13(1), 100839. CrossRef

3. Bianco, T., & Eklund, R. C. (2001). Conceptual considerations for social support research in sport and exercise settings: The case of sport injury. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23(2), 85-107. CrossRef

4. Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11(2), 123-151. CrossRef

5. Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (2002). The group environment questionnaire: Test manual. Fitness Information Technology.

6. Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D., & Côté, J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 56-64. CrossRef

7. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(3), 244-266. CrossRef

8. Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In: J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

9. Chen, L. H., Kee, Y. H., & Chen, M. Y. (2015). Why grateful adolescent athletes are more satisfied with their life: The mediating role of perceived team cohesion. Social Indicators Research, 124, 463-476. CrossRef

10. Cramer, D. (1998). Fundamental statistics for social research: Step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using SPSS for Windows. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.

11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. CrossRef

12. Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2015). Relationships between the coach-created motivational climate and athlete engagement in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(2), 193-198. CrossRef

13. Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In: B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social Support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York, NY: Wiley.

14. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. CrossRef

15. Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success why grittier competitors triumph at the national spelling bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174-181. CrossRef

16. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. CrossRef

17. Duru, E. (2007). Re-examination of the psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support among Turkish university students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(4), 443-452. CrossRef

18. Eys, M. A., Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2007). Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(3), 395-402. CrossRef

19. Falcão, W. R., Bloom, G. A., & Loughead, T. M. (2015). Coaches' perceptions of team cohesion in Paralympic sports. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(3), 206-222. CrossRef

20. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. CrossRef

21. Ford, P., Carling, C., Garces, M., Marques, M., Miguel, C., Farrant, A., Stenling, A., Moreno, J., Le Gall, F., Holmström, S., Salmela, J. H., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The developmental activities of elite soccer players aged under-16 years from Brazil, England, France, Ghana, Mexico, Portugal and Sweden. Journal of Sport Sciences, 30(15), 1653-1663. CrossRef

22. Freeman, P., & Rees, T. (2010). Perceived social support from team-mates: Direct and stress-buffering effects on self-confidence. European Journal of Sport Science, 10(1), 59-67. CrossRef

23. Freeman, P., Coffee, P., & Rees, T. (2011). The PASS-Q: The perceived available support in sport questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 54-74. CrossRef

24. Golembiewski, R. T. (1962). The Development of a Scale for the Measurement of Group Cohesiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(1), 71-88.

25. Gu, S., & Xue, L. (2022). Relationships among sports group cohesion, psychological collectivism, mental toughness and athlete engagement in Chinese team sports athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 4987. CrossRef

26. Heintzelman, S. J., & Bacon, P. L. (2015). Relational self-construal moderates the effect of social support on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 72-77. CrossRef

27. Holt, N. L., & Hoar, S. D. (2006). The multidimensional construct of social support. In: S. Hanton & S. Mellalieu (Eds.), Literature Reviews in Sport Psychology (pp. 199-225). Hauppauge, NY: NovaScience Publishers.

28. King, K. A., Tergerson, J. L., & Wilson, B. R. (2008). Effect of social support on adolescents' perceptions of and engagement in physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(3), 374-384. CrossRef

29. Larkin, P., O'Connor, D., & Williams, A. M. (2016). Does grit influence sport-specific engagement and perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite youth soccer? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(2), 129-138. CrossRef

30. Larkin, P., O'Connor, D., & Williams, A. M. (2016). Does grit influence sport-specific engagement and perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite youth soccer? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(2), 129-138. CrossRef

31. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. A. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Developmental and initial validation of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(4), 383-397. CrossRef

32. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. A. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Development and initial validation of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 471-492. CrossRef

33. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64(4), 259-309. CrossRef

34. Mahanta, D., & Aggarwal, M. (2013). Effect of Perceived Social Support on Life Satisfaction of University Students. European Academic Research, 1(6), 1083-1094.

35. Martin, J. J. (2019). Disability, physical activity, and psychological well-being. In: T. Horn & A. Smith (Eds.), Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology (pp. 375-386). CrossRef

36. Martin, J. J. (2018). Handbook of Disability Sport and Exercise Psychology. Oxford University Press. CrossRef

37. Martin, J. (2010). The psychosocial dynamics of youth disability sport. Sport Science Review, 19(5-6), 49-61. CrossRef

38. Martin, J. J., Byrd, B., Watts, M. L., & Dent, M. (2015). Gritty, hardy, and resilient: Predictors of sport engagement and life satisfaction in wheelchair basketball players. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 9(4), 345-359. CrossRef

39. Martin, J., Dadova, K., Jiskrova, M., & Snapp, E. (2020). Sport engagement and life satisfaction in Czech parasport athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 53, 36-50.

40. Martin, J. J., & Mushett, C. A. (1996). Social support mechanisms among athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13(1), 74-83. CrossRef

41. Martins, P., Rosado, A., Ferreira, V., & Biscaia, R. (2014). Examining the validity of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire (AEQ) in a Portuguese sport setting. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 20(1), 1-7. CrossRef

42. Mellano, K. T., & Pacewicz, C. (2023). The influence of social support provider on adolescent athlete burnout and engagement. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 17(4), 429-448. CrossRef

43. Pacewicz, C. E., Smith, A. L., & Raedeke, T. D. (2020). Group cohesion and relatedness as predictors of self-determined motivation and burnout in adolescent female athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 50, 101709. CrossRef

44. Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 583-630. CrossRef

45. Petrie, T. A., & Falkstein, D. L. (1998). Methodological, measurement, and statistical issues in research on sport injury prediction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10(1), 26-45. CrossRef

46. Rees, T., & Hardy, L. (2000). An investigation of the social support experiences of high-level sports performers. The Sport Psychologist, 14(4), 327-347. CrossRef

47. Shapiro, D. R., & Martin, J. J. (2014). The relationships among sport self-perceptions and social well-being in athletes with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7(1), 42-48. CrossRef

48. Shapiro, D. R., & Martin, J. J. (2010). Athletic identity, affect, and peer relations in youth athletes with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 3(2), 79-85. CrossRef

49. Smoll, F. L., Cumming, S. P., & Smith, R. E. (2011). Enhancing coach-parent relationships in youth sports: Increasing harmony and minimizing hassle. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6(1), 13-26. CrossRef

50. Swanson, S. R., Colwell, T., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Motives for participation and importance of social support for athletes with physical disabilities. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2(4), 317-336. CrossRef

51. Tedesqui, R. A., & Young, B. W. (2019). Relationships between athletesʼ self-reported grit levels and coach-reported practice engagement over one sport season. Journal of Sport Behavior, 42(4), 509-523.

52. Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 488-531. CrossRef

53. Udry, E., Gould, D., Bridges, D., & Beck, L. (1997). Down but not out: Athlete responses to season-ending injuries. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(3), 229-248. CrossRef

54. Williams, A. M., Ward, P., Bell-Walker, J., & Ford, P. R. (2011). Perceptual-cognitive expertise, practice history profiles and recall performance in soccer. British Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 393-411. CrossRef

55. Wills, T. A. & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In: S. Cohen, L.G. Underwood, & I. Gotlieb (Eds.), Social Support Measurement and Interventions (pp. 86-135). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

56. Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US. Social Indicators Research, 119, 443-453. CrossRef

57. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. CrossRef

Creative Commons License
The relationship between multidimensional social support and well-being in disability sport is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

157 x 230 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 190 czk
ISSN: 1212-1428
E-ISSN: 2336-6052

Download