AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA

AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica (AUC Kinanthropologica) is an international peer reviewed journal for the publication of research outcomes in the humanities, the social sciences and the natural sciences, as applied to kinathropology. It is a multidisciplinary journal accepting only original unpublished articles in English in the various sub-disciplines and related fields of kinanthropology, such as Anthropology, Anthropomotorics, Sports Pedagogy, Sociology of Sport, Philosophy of Sport, History of Sport, Physiology of Sport And Exercise, Physical Education, Applied Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Human Biomechanics, Psychology of Sport, Sports Training and Coaching, Sport Management, etc. The journal also welcomes interdisciplinary articles. The journal also includes reports of relevant activities and reviews of relevant publications.

The journal is abstracted and indexed by CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, SPOLIT, SPORTDiscus, and Ulrichsweb.

AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA, Vol 52 No 1 (2016), 58–66

The toss of the professional and the competitive tennis player: serving from the ad-court

Jan Carboch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2016.4
announced: 26. 09. 2016

abstract

We compared the serve toss of different types of serve when tennis players served from the ad-court. They used different spin on the ball and various ball placements in the opponent’s service box. Our aim was to compare the toss in different types of serve between a competitive (local tournament) player and a professional player, from the point of view of the receiving player, when they served from the ad-court. One professional and one competitive tennis player (both right handed) were observed while serving different types of serve to various locations of the opponent’s service box. We used a high-speed camera, which was placed opposite to the server in the position of a receiving player. The results showed that the players do not use the same toss for each type of serve. The professional player had a bigger range of racket-ball contact point on horizontal axis (32 cm) of the various types of first serves, compared to the competitive player (only 24 cm). The toss of the kick serve had similar characteristics between both players (the racket-ball contact point was observed to be mostly to the right, from the view of receiver). Neither the professional nor the competitive player showed a stable profile of toss. In some cases, the receiving players could anticipate the type of the serve from the server’s toss.

keywords: tennis; anticipation; visual perception; receiving player

references (15)

1. Abrams, G. D., Sheets, A. L., Andriacchi, T. P., & Safran, M. R. (2011). Review of tennis serve motion analysis and the biomechanics of three serve types with implications for injury. Sport Biomechanics, 10(4), 378–390. CrossRef

2. Australian Open (2015). Australian Open – Scores & Stats Match Statistics. Retrieved 10th February, 2015 (last access) from http://www.ausopen.com/en_AU/scores/extrastats/index.html.

3. Carboch, J. (2015). The Toss of Tennis Serves: Professional vs. Amateur. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 2(2), 200–204.

4. Carboch, J., & Süss, V. (2015). Toss Differences Between the Slice Serve and the Kick Serve in Tennis. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica, 45(2), 93–97. CrossRef

5. Carboch, J., Süss, V., & Kocib, T. (2014). Ball Machine Usage in Tennis: Movement Initiation and Swing Timing While Returning Balls from a Ball Machine and from a Real Server. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 13(2), 304–308.

6. Crespo, M., Miley, D. (2002). Tenisový trenérský manuál 2. stupně: pro vrcholové trenéry. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. (In Czech)

7. Cross, R. (2011). The kick serve in tennis. Sports Technology, 4(1–2), 19–28. CrossRef

8. Chow, J. W., Carlton, L. G., Lim, Y., Chae, W., Shim, J., Kuenster, A. F., & Kokubun, K. (2003). Comparing the pre- and post-impact ball and racquet kinematics of elite tennis players' first and second serves: a preliminary study. Journal of Sport Sciences, 21(7), 529–537. CrossRef

9. Dunlop, J. I. (2000). Characterizing the service bouncing using a speed gun. In: S. J. Haake & A. Coe (Eds.), Tennis Science & Technology (pp. 183–190). Oxford: Blackwell Science.

10. Gillet, E., Leroy, D., Thouvarecq, R., & Stein, J. F. (2009). A notational analysis of elite tennis serve and servereturn strategies on slow surface. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(2), 532–539. CrossRef

11. Kleinöder, H. (1997). The return of serve. In: ITF Special Newsletter – Edition on Biomechanics.

12. Reid, M., Whiteside, D., & Elliot, B. (2011). Serving to different locations: set up, toss and racket kinematics of the professional tennis serve. Sports Biomechanics, 10(4), 407–414. CrossRef

13. Sakurai, S., Reid, M., Elliot, B. (2013). Ball spin in tennis serve: spin rate and axis of rotation. Sport Biomechanics, 12(1), 23–29. CrossRef

14. Singer, R. N., Cauraugh, J. H., Chen, D., Steinberg, G. M., & Freilich, S. G. (1996). Visual search, anticipation and reactive comparisons between highly skilled and beginning tennis players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 9–26. CrossRef

15. Vaverka, F. (2010). Grand Slam 2008–2009 tělesné rozměry, servis, efektivita, úspěšnost, strategie. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. (In Czech)

157 x 230 mm
published: 2 x per year
print price: 190 czk
ISSN: 1212-1428
E-ISSN: 2336-6052

Download