Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 71 No 2 (2025), 185–206
Independence of Competition Protection and Telecommunications Market Regulatory Authorities in EU Law: A Real Requirement or a Theoretical Assumption?
Michalina Szpyrka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.398
published online: 29. 05. 2025
abstract
The EU legislator aims to construct a model in which matters related to competition protection and sector regulation will be examined by independent authorities. The recently adopted legal acts provide guarantees in service of this goal. However, the adopted method of regulation impairs the implementation of this correct assumption. This is due to the rudimentary nature and inconsistent definition of the bundle of guarantees that make up the independence models in various EU directives. Moreover, this imprecision in the description of the guarantees causes legal uncertainty and, in extreme cases, may lead to them being incorrectly implemented in the national legal order. To illustrate the thesis, examples of such irregularities are presented, taken from Polish law on competition protection and electronic communications.
keywords: independence; antitrust authority; telecommunications market regulation authority; ECN+ Directive; EECC Directive
references (21)
1. BANASIK, M. Administracyjnoprawne formy działań regulacyjnych niezależnych organów administracji publicznej [Administrative-legal forms of regulatory action by independent public administration]. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2019.
2. BERNATT, M. Economic frontiers of the rule of law: Sped-Pro v. Commission. Case T-791/19, Sped-Pro v. Commission, judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 February 2022. Common Market Law Review. 2023, Vol. 1, pp. 199-216. CrossRef
3. BŁACHUCKI, M. Niezależność organów administracji publicznej na przykładzie ewolucji statusu prawnego Prezesa UOKiK [Independence of public administration bodies as exemplified by the evolution of the legal status of the President of the OCCP]. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. 2019, No. 3977, pp. 263-274. CrossRef
4. CSERES, K. Defending the Rule of Law Through EU Competition Law: The Case of Hungary. Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Research Paper. 2024, Vol. 9, pp. 1-17. CrossRef
5. CSERES, K. Integrate or Separate. Institutional Design for the Enforcement of Competition Law and Consumer Law. Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper. 2013, No. 2013-03, pp. 1-54. CrossRef
6. DAVITKOVSKI, B. - PAVLOVSKA-DANEVA, A. - SHUMANOVSKA-SPASOVSKA, I. - DAVITKOVSKA, E. Independent bodies as a model of organization of the public administration. Juridical Tribune-Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies. 2018, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 453-476.
7. DRABEK, L. A Fair Hearing Before EC Institutions. European Review of Private Law. 2001, Vol. 4, pp. 529-563. CrossRef
8. LAVRIJSSEN, S. - DE VISSER, M. Independent Administrative Authorities and the Standard of Judicial Review. Utrecht Law Review. 2006, Vol. 1, pp. 111-135. CrossRef
9. LENAERTS, K. - VANHAMME, J. Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process. Common Market Law Review. 1997, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 531-569. CrossRef
10. MARTYNISZYN, M. - BERNATT, M. Implementing a Competition Law System: Three Decades of Poland Experience. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. 2020, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 165-215. CrossRef
11. MATERNA, G. Gwarancje niezależności organu ochrony konkurencji w dyrektywie ECN+ a status Prezesa UOKiK [Guarantees of the independence of the competition authority in the ECN+ Directive and the status of the President of the OCCP]. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy [European Judicial Review]. 2019, Vol. 10, pp. 19-26.
12. MATEUS, A. Why Should National Competition Authorities Be Independent and How Should They Be Accountable? European Competition Journal. 2007, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 17-30. CrossRef
13. MONTI, G. Interdependence and Legitimacy: The EU Commission, National Competition Authorities, and the European Competition Network. In: RITLENG, D. (ed.). Independence and Legitimacy in the Institutional System of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 180-181. CrossRef
14. PRECHAL, S. Does Direct Effect Still Matter? Common Market Law Review. 2000, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 1047-1069. CrossRef
15. PRECHAL, S. Directives in EC Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. CrossRef
16. PRECHAL, S. Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, Supremacy and the Evolving Constitution of the European Union. In: BARNARD, C. (ed.). The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 37-38. CrossRef
17. RUFFERT, M. Rights and Remedies in European Community Law: A Comparative View. Common Market Law Review. 1997, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 307 - 336. CrossRef
18. SHAPIRO, M. Deliberative, independent technocracy v. democratic politics. Will the globe echo the EU Law & Contemporary Problems. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2004, Vol. 68, No. 3-4, pp. 341-356.
19. VAN DE GRONDEN, J. - DE VRIES, S. Independent competition authorities in the EU. Utrecht Law Review. 2006, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 32-66. CrossRef
20. WILS, W. Competition Authorities: Towards More Independence and Prioritization? - The European Commission's "ECN+" Proposal for a Directive to Empower the Competition Authorities of the Member States to Be More Effective Enforcers'. In: SSRN [online]. 26. 6. 2017 [cit. 2024-12-12]. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3000260.
21. ZIELIŃSKA, U. Prezes UKE na tarczy? Nocna poprawka do Tarczy 3.0 i może się pakować [UKE CEO on the dial? An overnight amendment to Shield 3.0 and he can pack up]. In: Rzeczpospolita [The Republic] [online]. 30. 4. 2020 [cit. 2024-12-21]. Available at: https://cyfrowa.rp.pl/biznes-ludzie-startupy/art18080111-prezes-uke-na-tarczy-nocna-prawka-do-tarczy-3-0-i-moze-sie-pakowac.
Independence of Competition Protection and Telecommunications Market Regulatory Authorities in EU Law: A Real Requirement or a Theoretical Assumption? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
