Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 4 (2024), 163–176
The Law Liability of Non-Judicial Mediators in Land Right Disputes
Yahman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.166
published online: 28. 11. 2024
abstract
Land disputes are one of the most common cases in Indonesia. It is due to the demand for land ownership rights. In this case, mediation is used to resolve the case. The non-judicial mediator is a neutral party who helps the parties fairly. This study examines the civil law liabilities of non-judicial mediators in land ownership disputes and the legal position of a non-judicial mediator on authentic peace deeds. This research applied a juridical-normative approach with a law and a conceptual approach. The results indicated that non-judicial mediators, in carrying out their primary duties, both in terms of rights and obligations, must be based on law and protected by law to optimally provide services to the community while having a clear legal position in the notary. To sum up, unifying the mediation arrangement in one statutory regulation and mediation in the realm is necessary, both in litigation and non-litigation. In addition, future research can investigate the effectiveness and implementation of mediation certification, secrecy, financing, and repetition of mediation in land dispute cases. Further exploration is needed to understand the impact of mediation on the autonomy of the parties involved in land ownership disputes.
keywords: mediation; non-judicial mediator; law; land right dispute
references (37)
1. ABBAS, S. Mediasi Dalam Hukum Syariah Hukum Adat & Hukum Nasional [Mediation in Sharia Law Customary Law & National Law]. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009.
2. ADRIAN, L. The Role of Court-Connected Mediation and Judicial Settlement Efforts in the Preparatory Stage. In: ERVO, L. - NYLUND, A. (eds.). Current Trends in Preparatory Proceedings [online]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 209-231 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-29325-7_9. CrossRef
3. AKCHURIN, M. Constructing the Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reform, Mobilization, and Environmental Protection in Ecuador. Law & Social Inquiry [online]. 2015, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 937-968 [cit. 2023-05-29]. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0897654600004226/type/journal_article. CrossRef
4. ARWANA, Y. C. - ARIFIN, R. Jalur Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Sebagai Dorongan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia [Mediation in Land Dispute Resolution as an Encouragement to Fulfill Human Rights]. Jambura Law Review. 2019, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 212-236. CrossRef
5. ASSHIDDIQIE, J. Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia [The Idea of the Indonesian Rule of Law]. Jakarta: Majalah Hukum Indonesia, 2005.
6. AZZAHRO, M. Z. The Effectiveness of Non-judicial Mediators in Settlement of Divorce Cases in Elderly Cases at the Bantul Religious Court. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research. 2023, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 6575-6586.
7. BRUGGINK, J. J. H. Refleksi Tentang Hukum: Pengertian-Pengertian Dasar Tentang Teori Hukum Terjemahan Bernard Arief Sidharta [Reflections on Law: Basic Notions of Legal Theory Translated by Bernard Arief Sidharta]. 3rd ed. Bandung: Citra Aditia Bakti, 2011.
8. BUNGA, M. Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Tanah [Legal Review of the Competence of the State Administrative Court in Resolving Land Disputes]. Gorontalo Law Review. 2018, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39-49. CrossRef
9. CLAYTON, G. - DORUSSEN, H. The Effectiveness of Mediation and Peacekeeping for Ending Conflict. Journal of Peace Research. 2021, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 150-165. CrossRef
10. FAISAL, A. The Failure of Mediation in Divorce Cases Handling at Gorontalo Religious Court. Al-Mizan (e-Journal). 2022, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 337-356. CrossRef
11. HAJATI, S. et al. Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi dalam Mewujudkan Penyelesaian yang Efisiensi dan Berkepastian Hukum [Model of Land Dispute Settlement through Mediation in Realizing an Efficient and Legally Certain Settlement]. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum [Journal of Legal Dynamics]. 2014, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 36-48.
12. HANIFA, M. Perbandingan Tugas Mediator Pada Pengadilan Agama Indonesia Dengan Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia [Comparison of the Duties of Mediators in Indonesian Religious Courts with Malaysian Syariah Courts]. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata [Journal of Civil Procedure Law]. 2020, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 101-116. CrossRef
13. HARDIANTO, Y. - KHOIDIN, W. P. - UTAMI, R. S. The Implementation of Restorative Justice System to Resolve Domestic Violence Acts. YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice. 2023, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 1-13. CrossRef
14. HARYANTI, D. Konstruksi Hukum Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Teori Stufenbau [Legal Construction of the General Election Organizing Body in Indonesia Viewed from the Stufenbau Theory]. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum [Journal of Law Reform]. 2015, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 270-278.
15. ISWANTORO, I. Strategy and Management of Dispute Resolution, Land Conflicts at the Land Office of Sleman Regency. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System. 2021, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-18 [cit. 2023-05-29]. Available at: https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/3. CrossRef
16. KELSEN, H. General Theory of Law and State [online]. New York: Routledge, 2017 [cit. 2023-05-29]. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351517997. CrossRef
17. KELSEN, H. Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-dasar ilmu hukum normatif [Pure Legal Theory: Fundamentals of Normative Legal Science]. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010.
18. LATUKAU, F. - RUMKEL, N. - SUWARTI. Mediators Optimization of Civil Disputes Mediation Process at Post-Perma Court No. 1 of 2016. Journal of Social Science. 2022, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 714-729. CrossRef
19. MANULLANG, E. F. M. Mempertanyakan Pancasila Sebagai Grundnorm: Suatu Refleksi Kritis dalam Perspektif Fondasionalisme [Questioning Pancasila as a Grundnorm: A Critical Reflection in the Perspective of Foundationalism]. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan [Journal of Law & Development]. 2020, Vol 50, No. 2, pp. 284-301. CrossRef
20. MERTOKUSUMO, S. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar [Getting to Know the Law: An Introduction]. Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta, 2007.
21. MUSLIH, M. Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum) [The Indonesian State of Law in the Perspective of Gustav Radbruch's Legal Theory (Three Basic Values of Law)]. Legalitas [Legality]. 2013, Vol. IV, No. 1, pp. 130-152.
22. Mediator Non Hakim. Mahkamah Agung RI Pengadilan Ambon [Non-Judge Mediator. Supreme Court of Indonesia Ambon Court]. In: PENGADILAN AGAMA AMBON [online]. 6. 9. 2021 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://www.pa-ambon.go.id/layanan-hukum/hakim-mediator-2.
23. Peraturan Presiden. Badan Pertanahan Nasional [Presidential Regulation. National Land Agency]. Indonesia, 2006.
24. PIETRASZEWSKI, D. Toward a Computational Theory of Social Groups: A Finite Set of Cognitive Primitives for Representing Any and All Social Groups in the Context of Conflict. Behavioral and Brain Sciences [online]. 2022, Vol. 45, No. e97 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X21000583/type/journal_article. CrossRef
25. RAHARDJO, S. Ilmu Hukum [Legal Science]. Bandung: PT Citra Adityia Bhakti, 2000.
26. RIJADI, P. - PRIYATI, S. Membangun Ilmu Hukum Mazhab Pancasila Dalam Buku: Memahami Hukum Dari Konstruksi Sampai Implementasi [Building Pancasila Mazhab Law Science in Books: Understanding Law from Construction to Implementation]. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.
27. SADNYINI, I. A. Legal Protection Interior Design in Industrial Design Intellectual Property Rights. Jurnal Notariil [Notarial Journal]. 2021, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 27-37. CrossRef
28. SIMANULLANG, C. - IFTITAH, A. Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I B Blitar [Mediation in Civil Dispute Resolution at the Blitar Class I B District Court]. Jurnal Supremasi [Supremacy Journal] [online]. 2018, Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 3 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/index.php/supremasi/article/view/379. CrossRef
29. SUBRATA, R. Mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia. Jurnal Litigasi (e-Journal). 2023, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.151-164. CrossRef
30. SULISTIONO, J. - HARIES, A. - RAHMI, M. The Role of Non Judge Mediators Providing Guarantee of Women's Rights Protection in Divorce Cases. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan [Al Qalam: Scientific Journal of Religion and Society]. 2022, Vol. 16, No. 4. CrossRef
31. SULISTIYONO, A. - MARET, S. Mediation as an Alternative Institution of Disclaimer in Religion Court in Indonesia According to Justice Perspective. Atkantis Press. 2019, Vol. 358, pp. 115-118.
32. SUTARSA, A. Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Indonesia Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Tanah Untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum [Model of Land Dispute Resolution in Indonesia in Land Law Reform to Realize Legal Certainty]. Institutional repositories and scientific journal. 2017.
33. SYAMSUDDI, A. Proses Dan Teknik Penyusunan Undang-Undang [Law Drafting Process and Techniques]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
34. TAN, D. The Singapore Convention on Mediation to Reinforce the Status of International Mediated Settlement Agreement: Breakthrough or Redundancy? Conflict Resolution Quarterly [online]. 2023, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 467-482 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21377. CrossRef
35. TAVARES, M. C. - AZEVEDO, G. - MARQUES, R. P. The Challenges and Opportunities of Era 5.0 for a More Humanistic and Sustainable Society: A Literature Review. Societies [online]. 2022, Vol. 12, No. 6 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/6/149. CrossRef
36. TVARONAVIČIENĖ, A. - KAMINSKIENĖ, N. - ŽEMAITAITYTĖ, I. - CUDOWSKA, M. Towards More Sustainable Dispute Resolution in Courts: Empirical Study on Challenges of the Court-Connected Mediation in Lithuania. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues [online]. 2021, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 633-653 [cit. 2024-05-20]. Available at: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/804. CrossRef
37. UCHEAKONAM, C. Arbitration, International Mediation, and the Widening of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Space: Bloated Expectations or a Matter of Time? In: SSRN [online]. 2023 [cit. 2023-05-29]. Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4491851. CrossRef
The Law Liability of Non-Judicial Mediators in Land Right Disputes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
