Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 2 (2024), 159–169
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Civil Procedure in the Czech Republic
Miroslav Sedláček
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.29
published online: 23. 05. 2024
abstract
The paper focuses on the issue of automated decision-making in civil proceedings. First of all, attention is given to procedural institutes that direct and facilitate automated decision-making, in particular the digital court file and the legal framework of videoconferencing equipment, without focusing on electronic service of documents, which should be a separate paper. Asingle case of legal regulation of automated decision-making in the form of an electronic payment order is then analyzed (cf. Section 174a of the Code of Civil Procedure). For each of these fields, an analysis of digitalization to date is given, which is followed by a consideration of further developments. It also outlines the limits encountered by the use of modern technologies and the potential risks proposed adjustments.
keywords: civil procedure; civil proceedings; automation; judicial decision-making; decision; digitization; machines and judges; AI
references (15)
1. DRÁPAL, L. - BUREŠ, J. et al. Občanský soudní řád I. § 1 až 200za: komentář [Code of Civil Procedure I. § 1 to 200za: Commentary]. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2009.
2. FANGFEI WANG, F. Online Dispute Resolution: technology, management and legal practice from an international perspective. England: Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Limited, 2009.
3. JIRSA, J. et al. Občanské soudní řízení: soudcovský komentář. Kniha I: § 1-250l občanského soudního řádu [Civil Proceedings: Judicial Commentary. Book I: § 1-250l of the Code of Civil Procedure]. 4th ed. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2023.
4. KATSH, E. - RABINOVICH-EINY, O. Digital justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. CrossRef
5. KMEC, J. - KOSAŘ, D. - KRATOCHVÍL, J. - BOBEK, M. Evropská úmluva o lidských právech: komentář [European Convention on Human Rights: Commentary]. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2012.
6. KORBEL, F. Aktuality. Soudní rozhledy [Judicial Reviews]. 2017, No. 5, p. 145.
7. LAVICKÝ, P. et al. Moderní civilní proces [The Modern Civil Procedure]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Právnická fakulta, 2014.
8. LAVICKÝ, P. et al. Občanský soudní řád (§ 1 až 150l): řízení sporné: praktický komentář [Code of Civil Procedure (Sections 1 to 150l): Contentious Proceedings: Practical Commentary]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2016.
9. LOUTOCKÝ, P. Vymahatelnost práva pomocí online řešení sporů [Law Enforcement through Online Dispute Resolution]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2020.
10. SEDLÁČEK, M. Elektronizace justice a nové technologie v civilním procesu [Digitalization of Justice and New Technologies in Civil Proceedings]. In: SEDLÁČEK, M. - STŘELEČEK, T. et al. Civilní právo a nové technologie [Civil Law and New Technologies]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2022, pp. 195-205.
11. SVOBODA, K. Řízení v prvním stupni: civilní proces z pohledu účastníka [Proceedings at First Instance: Civil Procedure from the Perspective of a Litigant]. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2019.
12. SUSSKIND, R. Online Court and the Future of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. CrossRef
13. ŠÍNOVÁ, R. - HAMUĽAKOVÁ, K. et al. Civilní proces: obecná část a sporné řízení [Civil Procedure: General and Adversarial Proceedings]. 2nd ed. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2020.
14. WING, L. - RAINEY, D. Online Dispute Resolution and the Development of Theory. In: WAHAB, M. - KATSH, E. - RAINEY, D. (eds.). Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2012, pp. 19-38.
15. ZAHRADNÍKOVÁ, R. et al. Civilní právo procesní [Civil Procedural Law]. 3rd ed. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2018.
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Civil Procedure in the Czech Republic is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
