Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 2 (2024), 147–157
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Public Administration in Slovakia
Radomír Jakab
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.28
published online: 23. 05. 2024
abstract
The development of information technology and its use in everyday life must inevitably have an impact on public administration and its decision-making. Progress in artificial intelligence is also opening up wider opportunities for the use of automation of decision-making processes in public administration. Decision-making processes that once had to be handled by humans can now be automated. However, there must be a sufficient legal basis for this, setting out the legal limits of such automated decision-making. In this paper, the legal possibilities of automation of decision-making processes in the field of public administration in the Slovak Republic were examined, the obstacles that hinder the use of this tool were defined, as well as certain legal solutions eliminating or minimizing the consequences of these obstacles were outlined. The purpose of this paper was not to exhaustively describe and solve the problems with the automation of decision-making processes in public administration in the Slovak Republic. Rather, the purpose was to outline the problem areas that should be addressed in legal research in the coming period.
keywords: public administration; automation; decision-making; decision; artificial intelligence
references (19)
1. ANDRAŠKO, J. Bezpečnosť informačných systémov verejnej správy vo svetle zákona o kybernetickej bezpečnosti a zákona o informačných technológiách vo verejnej správe. Revue pro právo a technologie [online]. 2019, Vol. 10, No. 20, pp. 3-40 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://journals.muni.cz/revue/article/view/12536. CrossRef
2. BAKOŠOVÁ, L. Climate Action Through Artificial Intelligence: International Legal Perspective. Studia Iuridica Casoviensia [online]. 2022, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 3-24 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/7115298. CrossRef
3. BAKOŠOVÁ, L. Ethical and Legal Aspects of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health and Nursing Care. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia [online]. 2020, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 3-18 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/5115457. CrossRef
4. BENCH-CAPON, T. - GORDON, T. F. Isomorphism and argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM, 2009, pp. 11-20 [cit. 2023-12-07]. CrossRef
5. BRANTING, K. -WEISS, B. -BROWN, B. -PFEIFER, C. -CHAKRABORTY, A. -FERRO, L. - PFAFF, M. - YEH, A. Semi-Supervised Methods for Explainable Legal Prediction. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM, 2019, pp. 22-31 [cit. 2023-12-07]. CrossRef
6. BRAUN BINDER, N. Weg frei für vollautomatisierte Verwaltungsverfahren in Deutschland [online]. Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich, 2016, pp. 2-12 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/141625/1/Braun_Binder_Jusletter-IT_weg-frei-fur-vollaut_56bc7ccb4c_de.pdf.
7. Digitalizácia. In: Úrad pre územné plánovanie a výstavbu Slovenskej republiky [online]. [cit. 2023-01-07]. Available at: https://stavebnyurad.gov.sk/digitalizacia.
8. ERBGUTH, W. - GUCKELBERGER, A. Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht: mit Verwaltungsprozessrecht und Staatshaftungsrecht. 9. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017. CrossRef
9. ETSCHEID, J. Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration. In: LINDGREN, I. - JANSSEN, M. - LEE, H. - POLINI, A. - RODRÍGUEZ BOLÍVAR, M. P. - SCHOLL, H. J. - TAMBOURIS, E. (eds.). Electronic Government [online]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11685. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 248-261 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_19.
10. FILIČKO, V. - SOKOL, M. Elektronizácia a digitalizácia ako prostriedok odňatia práva na súdnu ochranu - vybrané aspekty. Studia iuridica Cassoviensia [online]. 2021, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 34-42 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/5526192. CrossRef
11. FINLAY, S. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Business: a No-nonsense Guide to Data Driven Technologies. Great Britain: Relativistic Books, 2017.
12. HUČKOVÁ, R. Zásady spracovania osobných údajov podľa GDPR so zreteľom na oblasť poskytovania zdravotnej starostlivosti. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia [online]. 2020, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 30-44 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/5115470. CrossRef
13. JAKAB, R. Verejnosprávny cyklus v správnych procesoch. Public administration and society. 2010, Vol. XI, No. 2, pp. 12-8.
14. MAINZER, K. Künstliche Intelligenz - Wann übernehmen die Maschinen? Technician im Focus. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2016. CrossRef
15. MINSKY, M. L. Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1967.
16. SUKSI, M. Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law [online]. 2021, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 87-110 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10506-020-09269-x. CrossRef
17. SUKSI, M. On the openness of the digital society: from religion via language to algorithm as the basis for the exercise of public powers. In: LIND, A. S. - REICHEL, J. - ÖSTERDAHL, I. (eds.). Transparency in the future - Swedish openness 250 years. Tallinn: Ragulka Press, pp. 285-317.
18. TEKELI, J. Záruky zákonnosti vo verejnej správe. In: SEMAN, T. - JAKAB, R. - TEKELI, J. Správne právo hmotné: všeobecná časť. Košice: ŠafárikPress, 2020, pp. 172-186.
19. TURING, A. M. I. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind [online]. 1950, Vol. LIX, No. 236, pp. 433-460 [cit. 2023-12-07]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238. CrossRef
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Public Administration in Slovakia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
