Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 2 (2024), 13–22
Tracing the Evolutionary Path of Experimental Law: from Comparative Law to Regulatory Sandboxes
Alexandre Flückiger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.19
published online: 23. 05. 2024
abstract
This paper explores the evolution of the experimental paradigm in legal frameworks, tracing its development from early influences in comparative law to the contemporary application of regulatory sandboxes. It begins with the integration of empirical methods inspired by scientific research into the field of law. The exploration covers various aspects of experimental law, including federalism, comparative law, legisprudence, emergency and incremental legislation, soft law, sunset legislation, temporary regulations, and experimental legislation stricto sensu. The paper concludes by discussing the challenges and implications of balancing experimental law’s flexibility with the need for legal stability and security.
keywords: experimental law; evidence-based legislation; legisprudence; technological innovation in law; legal security; regulatory sandboxes
references (17)
1. BEUTEL, F. Some Potentialities of Experimental Jurisprudence as a New Branch of Social Science. Lincoln: The university of Nebraska Press, 1957. CrossRef
2. BUOCZ, T. - PFOTENHAUER, S. - EISENBERGER, I. Regulatory sandboxes in the AI Act: reconciling innovation and safety? Law, Innovation and Technology. 2023, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 357- 389. CrossRef
3. CRUET, J. La vie du droit et l'impuissance des lois. Paris: Flammarion, 1908.
4. FLÜCKIGER, A. (Re)faire la loi: traité de légistique à l'ère du droit souple. Berne: Stämpfli, 2019.
5. FLÜCKIGER, A. Le droit expérimental: potentiel et limites en situation épidémiologique extraordinaire. Sécurité et droit. 2020, Vol. 3, pp. 142-158.
6. FLÜCKIGER, A. - POPELIER, P. Policy evaluation in the legislative cycle. In: VARONE, F. - JACOB, S. - BUNDI, P. (eds.). Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 64-75. CrossRef
7. HANDRLICA, J. The Splendid Durability of the Provisional: A Tribute to Euratom. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy. 2018, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 161-180. CrossRef
8. LEWIS, G. A treatise on the methods of observation and reasoning in politics. London: John W. Parker, 1852
9. NOLL, P. Gesetzgebungslehre. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1973.
10. OECD. Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 365. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023.
11. OFNER, J. "Das Experiment im Recht". Vortrag, gehalten in der Juristischen Gesellschaft in Wien am 28. Dezember 1881. In: OFNER, J. (ed.). Beiträge zur exakten Rechtswissenschaft. Wien, 1883, p. 7 ff.
12. OST, F. Codification et temporalité dans la pensée de J. Bentham. In: GÉRARD, F. - OST, F. - VAN DE KERCHOVE, M. (eds.). Actualité de la pensée juridique de Jeremy Bentham. Bruxelles: Presses universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles, 1987. CrossRef
13. PARENTI, R. - European Parliament, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs for FinTech: impact on innovation, financial stability and supervisory convergence. Luxembourg: European Parliament, 2020.
14. RANCHORDÁS, S. Constitutional Sunsets and Experimental Legislation: a Comparative Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. CrossRef
15. RANCHORDÁS, S. Experimental Regulations and Regulatory Sandboxes: Law without Order? Law & Method. December 2021. CrossRef
16. VOLZ, S. KI-Sandboxen für die Schweiz? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Finanzmarktrecht SZW. 2022, Nr. 1, pp. 51-68.
17. WILLIAMS, J. Experiment in Legislation. Law Magazine and Review. 1889, Vol. XIV, pp. 299-353.
Tracing the Evolutionary Path of Experimental Law: from Comparative Law to Regulatory Sandboxes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
