Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 69 No 2 (2023), 155–169
An Ethically Indifferent Code of Ethics? Analysis of the Character of the Czech Bar Association’s Code of Ethics
Tomáš Friedel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.21
published online: 07. 06. 2023
abstract
The Czech Bar Association published a text which has the words “code of ethics” in its title. The aim of this paper is to determine whether the norms contained in the code are actually related to ethics or whether they concern different fields. The paper first explains the raison d’être of codes of ethics in general and briefly introduces the Czech Bar Association and the origin of its code of ethics. The principal section of the paper is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the text of the Czech Bar Association’s code of ethics applying a method used in England for similar purposes by Donald Nicolson. The analysis shows that the Czech Bar Association’s code of ethics deals with ethical issues only to a lesser extent and that it contains numerous provisions which do not deal with ethics at all. The paper proposes to remedy this unsuitable state by creating two separate codes. The first would primarily regulate ethically relevant situations in legal practice. The other code would contain “other” rules of the profession.
keywords: code of ethics; ethical code; rules of professional conduct; lawyer; legal ethics; Czech Republic; Czech Bar Association
references (21)
1. ANZENBACHER, A. Úvod do etiky [An introduction to ethics]. Praha: Zvon, 1994.
2. BARON, P. - CORBIN, L. The Unprofessional Professional: Do Lawyers Need Rules? Legal Ethics. 2017, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 155-173. CrossRef
3. BOON, A. Lawyers' Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015. CrossRef
4. ČERMÁK, K. Pravidla profesionální etiky a pravidla soutěže advokátů České republiky: text s komentářem JUDr. Karla Čermáka [The Rules of Professional Ethics and Rules of Competition among Attorneys-at-Law of the Czech Republic: text with commentary by JUDr. Karel Čermák]. Praha: Česká advokátní komora, 1996.
5. CHAFFE, E. C. Death and Rebirth of Codes of Legal Ethics: How Neuroscientific Evidence of Intuition and Emotion in Moral Decision Making Should Impact the Regulation of the Practice of Law. The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. 2015, Vol. 28, No. 2, p. 323 and ff.
6. COPP, D. Introduction: Metaethics and normative ethics. In: COPP, D. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 3-36. CrossRef
7. EVANS, A. The Good Lawyer. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2014. CrossRef
8. HERRING, J. Legal Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
9. JOHNSON, V. R. The Virtues and Limits of Codes in Legal Ethics. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy. 2000, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 25-47.
10. KOVÁŘOVÁ, D. - SOKOL, T. Etický kodex advokáta: komentář [Code of Ethics of an Attorney-at-Law: Commentary]. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2019.
11. KRSKOVÁ, A. Etika právnického povolania [Ethics of the Legal Profession]. Bratislava: Vydavateľské oddelenie Právnickej fakulty Univerzity Komenského, 1994.
12. LERMAN, L. - SCHRAG, P. Ethical Problems in the Practice of Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
13. LODER, R. E. Tighter Rules of Professional Conduct: Saltwater for Thirst. The Georgetown Journal of Ethics. 1987, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 311 and ff.
14. MOORE, N. J. Lawyer Ethics Code Drafting in the Twenty-first Century. Hofstra Law Review. 2002, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 923-945.
15. NICOLSON, D. Mapping Professional Legal Ethics. Legal Ethics. 1998, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51-69. CrossRef
16. NICOLSON, D. - WEBB, J. Professional Legal Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
17. PARKER, CH. - EVANS, A. Inside Lawyers' Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. CrossRef
18. 17. SEDLÁČEK, M. Lawyers' Ethics before a Civil Court. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica. 2021, Vol. LXVII, No. 3, pp. 57-69. CrossRef
19. SKUCZYŃSKI, P. The Status of Legal Ethics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, 2013.
20. SVEJKOVSKÝ, J. - VYCHOPEŇ, M. - KRYM, L. et al. Zákon o advokacii: komentář [The Act on the Legal Profession: a Commentary]. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2012.
21. WILKINSON, M. A. - WALKER, CH. - MERCES, P. Do Codes of Ethics Actually Shape Legal Practice? McGill Law Journal. 2000, Vol. 45, No. 3, p. 645 and ff.
An Ethically Indifferent Code of Ethics? Analysis of the Character of the Czech Bar Association’s Code of Ethics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
