Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 69 No 2 (2023), 53–70
Efficiencies under the Digital Markets Act – Is There Space for the Rule of Reason?
Ondrej Blažo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.14
published online: 07. 06. 2023
abstract
The aim of this paper is to evaluate, if competition-like efficiencies of European-style rule of reason shall apply also in the context of the ex-ante regulation by the DMA. The rationale of such consideration lies in the concept of proportionality of the EU regulation and the assumption that EU law cannot proscribe behaviour with beneficial outcomes and effects that does not have negative consequences on the internal market outweighing the positive effects. The analysis is divided into three parts in this paper: position of the rule of law and the per se prohibition in the legal development of the EU competition law, the relationship between the DMA and competition law, including competition-based efficiencies brought in digital market cases and finally the per se prohibition included in the DMA. The analysis of the development of the case law showed that in the EU competition law the principle of per se prohibitions was never accepted and the CJEU accepted justifications outside the text of the statutory exemptions. Even though the aim of the DMA may be the introduction of a per se prohibition in order to facilitate the Commission’s enforcement, it cannot be surprising if the CJ EU will, in some case in the future, follow the path of the EU-style rule of reason in the framework of the DMA as well on the basis of proportionality principle. The lesson learned from application of rule of reason in the context of agreements restricting competition or as a specific form of objective justification in the context of abuse of dominant position does not undermine effectiveness of competition law. The quasi per se concept can satisfy both: it shows that it is not probable that such a behaviour will be allowed and at the same time it dodges proportionality objections because the prohibition is not, at least theoretically, absolutely, per se.
keywords: digital markets; European Union law; Digital Markets Act; per se prohibition; economic efficiencies; rule of reason
references (28)
1. BANIA, K. Fitting the Digital Markets Act in the existing legal framework: the myth of the "without prejudice" clause. European Competition Journal [online]. 2022, pp. 1-34 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441056.2022.2156730. CrossRef
2. BEEMS, B. The DMA in the broader regulatory landscape of the EU: an institutional perspective. European Competition Journal [online]. 2022, pp. 1-29 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441056.2022.2129766. CrossRef
3. BENDIEK, A. The Impact of the Digital Service Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA) on European Integration Policy Digital market regulation as one of five major digital policy projects of the EU 1 Annegret Bendiek Content. Research Division. 2021, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-15.
4. BLAŽO, O. Rule of Reason, pridružené obmedzenia a systém výnimiek v príprade dohôd obmedzujúcich súťaž v európskom a slovenskom práve. Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae. 2012, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 17-81.
5. BLAŽO, O. The Digital Markets acts: between market regulation, competition rules and unfair trade practices rules. Strani pravni zivot [online]. 2022, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 117-136 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/spvniz2022&div=10&id=&page=. CrossRef
6. VAN DEN BOOM, J. What does the Digital Markets Act harmonize? - exploring interactions between the DMA and national competition laws. European Competition Journal [online]. 2022, pp. 1-29 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441056.2022.2156728. CrossRef
7. BOTTA, M. Sector Regulation of Digital Platforms in Europe: Uno, Nessuno e Centomila. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 500-512 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article-abstract/12/7/500/6295374?redirectedFrom=fulltext. CrossRef
8. BUDZINSKI, O. - MENDELSOHN, J. Regulating Big Tech : from Competition Policy to Sector Regulation ? [online]. Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00054484/Diskussionspapier_Nr_154.pdf.
9. CABRAL, L. et al. The EU digital markets act: a report from a panel of economic experts. [online]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC122910.
10. CENNAMO, C. - SANTALÓ, J. Value in Digital Platforms: the Choice of Tradeoffs in the Digital Markets Act. In: SSRN [online]. 1.7.2022, pp. 1-9 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4152113.
11. CHIRICO, F. Digital Markets Act: a Regulatory Perspective. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 493-499 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article-abstract/12/7/493/6328829?redirectedFrom=fulltext. CrossRef
12. COLANGELO, G. The European Digital Markets Act and Antitrust Enforcement: a Liaison Dangereuse. European Law Review. 2022, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 597-621.
13. DE STREEL, A. et al. Making the digital markets act more resilient and effective. In: Centre on Regulation in Europe [online]. 26.5.2021 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://cerre.eu/publications/european-parliament-digital-markets-act-dma-resilient-effective/. CrossRef
14. FEJØ, J. Monopoly law and market: studies of EC Competition Law with US American Antitrust Law as a frame of reference and supported by basic market economics. Deventer, Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1990.
15. GEORGIEVA, Z. The Digital Markets Act Proposal of the European Commission : Ex-ante Regulation, Infused with Competition Principles. European Papers [online]. 2021, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 25-28 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_EF_2021_I_003_Zlatina_Georgieva_00448.pdf.
16. IBÁÑEZ COLOMO, P. The Draft Digital Markets Act: a Legal and Institutional Analysis. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 561-575 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article/12/7/561/6357803. CrossRef
17. KALESNÁ, K. - PATAKYOVÁ, M. T. Digitálne platformy: súťažné právo verzus regulácia ex ante [Digital platforms: competition law versus ex ante regulation]. Právny obzor. 2021, Vol. 104, No. 1, pp. 26-38. CrossRef
18. KERBER, W. Taming Tech Giants with a Per-Se Rules Approach? The Digital Markets Act from the 'Rules vs. Standard' Perspective. In: SSRN [online]. 2.6.2021 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3861706. CrossRef
19. LAMADRID DE PABLO, A. - BAYÓN FERNÁNDEZ, N. Why the Proposed DMA Might Be Illegal under Article 114 TFEU, and How to Fix It. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 576-589 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article/12/7/576/6340860?rss=1. CrossRef
20. LAROUCHE, P. - DE STREEL, A. The European Digital Markets Act: a Revolution Grounded on Traditions. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 542-560 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article/12/7/542/6357796?guestAccessKey=e67533fd-38d2-4e04-bfe9-2c09ecf890df.
21. NAZZINI, R. Article 81 EC between time present and time past: a normative critique of "restriction of competition" in EU law. Common Market Law Review [online]. 2006, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 497-536 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/43.2/COLA2006005. CrossRef
22. PETIT, N. The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): a Legal and Policy Review. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice [online]. 2021, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 529-541 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/article/12/7/529/6333059. CrossRef
23. PODSZUN, R. - BONGARTZ, P. - LANGENSTEIN, S. Proposals on how to improve the Digital Markets Act. In: SSRN [online]. 18.2.2021 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3788571.
24. DI PORTO, F. et al. "I see something you don't see": a computational analysis of the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act. Stanford Journal of Computational Antitrust [online]. 2021, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 84-116 [cit. 2023-03-09]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3780938. CrossRef
25. ROBERTSON, V. Delineating Digital Markets under EU Competition Law: Challenging or Futile? The Competition Law Review. 2017, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 131-151.
26. ROUSSEVA, E. The Concept of 'Objective Justification' of an Abuse of a Dominant Position: Can it help to Modernise the Analysis under Article 82 EC? Competition Law Review. 2006, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 27-72.
27. VOGELAAR, F. O. W. - STUYCK, J. - REEKEN, B. L. P. VAN. Competition law in the EU, its member states and Switzerland. The Hague, Deventer: Kluwer Law International, W. E. J. Tjeenk Willin, 2002.
28. WHISH, R. Competition Law. 5th ed. London: LexisNexis, 2003.
Efficiencies under the Digital Markets Act – Is There Space for the Rule of Reason? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
