Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 67 No 4 (2021), 45–59
Rozhraní ústavního a správního práva
[The Interface between Constitutional and Administrative Law]
Richard Pomahač
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2021.37
published online: 07. 12. 2021
abstract
Constitutional and administrative law are two related branches of law. But are the boundaries separating constitutional and administrative law truly clear? Many excellent experts in public law have already answered this question. However, as the legal system evolves, the answer to this question can be neither complete nor definitive. Nevertheless, it is possible to mark a number of bright and dark sides of the normative duality of constitutional and administrative law. Attention is focused on the constitutionalization of administrative law, but no less important is the deconstitutionalization of public administration in conditions of over-regulation connected with fragmentary and inconsistent legislation. However, it is not just a question of the integrity of the legal order. There are also a number of practical problems in the sphere of disputes resolution using dual argumentation.
keywords: constitutional law; administrative law; interface; constitutionalisation and deconstitutionalisation of administrative law
references (19)
1. CRAIG, P. Law, Fact and Discretion in the UK, EU and the USA. In: La chaire Mutations de l'Action Publique et du Droit Public, Sciences Po [online]. 2007, s. 10-11 [cit. 2021-05-18]. Dostupné na: https://www.sciencespo.fr/chaire-madp/sites/sciencespo.fr.chaire-madp/files/paul_craig.pdf.
2. FAYE, A. Les bases administratives du droit constitutionnel: recherche sur la culture administrative du droit constitutionnel. Paris: Fondation Varenne, 2017.
3. FOUCAULT, M. Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009.
4. GINSBURG, T. Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. In: ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. - LINDSETH, P. L. (eds.). Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010. CrossRef
5. GOODNOW, F. J. Comparative Administrative Law. New York: Burt Franklin, 1903, reprinted 1970.
6. HAMBURGER, P. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014. CrossRef
7. HAVLÍČEK, K. Osudné vynálezy lidstva: obtížná cesta k fragmentárnímu státu a osvícenému právu. Praha: Academia, 2020.
8. HENDRYCH, D. a kol. Správní právo: obecná část. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2016.
9. HEUSCHLING, L. The complex relationship between administrative and constitutional law: a comparative and historical analysis. In: VON BOGDANDY, A. - HUBER, P. M. - CASSESE, S. (eds.). The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Vol. 1, The Administrative State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
10. KOPECKÝ, M. Správní právo: obecná část. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2019.
11. KYSELA, J. Poznámky ke stavu oboru ústavního práva a státovědy. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. 2017, roč. 25, č. 3, s. 375-390. CrossRef
12. LINDSETH, P. L. Between the 'Real' and the 'Right': Explorations along the Institutional-Constitutional Frontier. In: ADAMS, M. - MEUWESE, A. - BALLIN, E. H. (eds.). Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, s. 60-93. CrossRef
13. LUTHER, J. Realism and Idealism in the Italian Constitutional Culture. In: ADAMS, M. - MEUWESE, A. - BALLIN, E. H. (eds.). Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
14. MAGNON, X. Commentaire sous Les bases constitutionnelles du droit administratif, la controverse G. Vedel/Ch. Eisenmann. In: BENETTI, J. - EGÉA, P. - MAGNON, X. - MASTOR, W. Les grands discours de la culture juridique. 2e éd. Paris: Dalloz, 2017. Online in: Hal: archives-ouveretes.fr [online]. [cit. 2021-05-26]. Dostupné na: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01725355.
15. MERKL, A. Obecné právo správní. Díl první. Praha - Brno: Orbis, 1934.
16. PRAŽÁK, J. Rakouské právo ústavní. Část první. Praha: Národní knihtiskárna a nakladatelstvo, 1895.
17. SLÁDEČEK, V. Obecné správní právo. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2013.
18. TAMIR, M. Public Law as a Whole and Normative Duality: Reclaiming Administrative Insights in Enforcement Review. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights [online]. 2006, Vol. 12, No. 1 [cit. 2021-05-18]. Dostupné na: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1011404.
19. WOLLENSCHLÄGER, F. Constitutionalisation and deconstitutionalisation of administrative law in view of Europeanisation and emancipation. Review of European Administrative Law. 2017, roč. X, č. 1, s. 7-79. CrossRef
Rozhraní ústavního a správního práva is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
