Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 66 No 4 (2020), 143–155
Czech perspective on validity of international arbitration clauses contained in an exchange of emails under the New York Convention
[Czech perspective on validity of international arbitration clauses contained in an exchange of emails under the New York Convention]
Petr Bříza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2020.37
published online: 16. 12. 2020
abstract
The article deals with the writing requirement of the arbitration clause under the New York Convention (the “Convention”). The discussion has been triggered by the recent Czech Supreme Court decision on the formal validity of an arbitration clause contained in an exchange of emails. The author first recalls the drafting history of the Convention and rationale behind the writing requirement. Then he analyses its interpretation in the practice of court before and after the 2006 UNCITRAL Recommendation, which suggested extending the interpretation to modern forms of communication such as email. The main part of the article closely scrutinizes the Czech Supreme Court’s decision on the issue. The Court followed the 2006 Recommendation and the majority of its foreign counterparts. However, it also had to deal with the question of whether an email has to be accompanied by a qualified electronic signature for the written form to be met, as this is (unfortunately) the Court’s requirement when it comes to relations governed by Czech law. Fortunately, the Court has taken an international approach looking both to foreign courts’ practice and to its own case-law under other international conventions such as the CISG or the CMR. Thus it has arrived at the conclusion that the writing requirement under the Convention is met also in the case of an arbitration agreement contained in an exchange of simple emails.
keywords: arbitration clause; New York Convention; written form; electronic legal act; arbitration proceedings
references (5)
1. BĚLOHLÁVEK, A. J., Zákon o rozhodčím řízení a o výkonu rozhodčích nálezů. Komentář. 2nd edition. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2012, marg. 03.29 et seq.
2. GROBHANS, A., LANDI, N. Arbitration Agreements: Written Form Requirements and New Means of Communication. Bocconi Legal Papers. 2014, 4, p. 226.
3. KÖTZ, H. European Contract Law. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, 2017, at 75-76.
4. LANDAU, T. - MOOLLAN, S. Article II and the Requirement of the Form. In: GAILLARD, E. - Di PIETRO, D. (eds). Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention 1958 in Practice. London: Cameron May Ltd, 2008, at 220.
5. PFEIFFER, Magdaléna, PAUKNEROVÁ, Monika, RŮŽIČKA, Květoslav et al. Mezinárodní obchodní právo, 1. vyd. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2019, at 315.
Czech perspective on validity of international arbitration clauses contained in an exchange of emails under the New York Convention is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
