Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 64 No 4 (2018), 39–52
Národní identita členského štátu jako dôvod poskytnutia odlišnej miery ochrany základných práv v porovnaní s Chartou základných práv EÚ
[National Identity of EU Member State as a Reason for Granting a Different Level of Fundamental Rights Protection in Comparison with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU]
Valéria Miháliková
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2018.32
published online: 04. 01. 2019
abstract
The presented paper deals with the question of whether the wording of Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union allows the EU Member States to grant a different level of fundamental rights protection in comparison with the level of protection granted by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. The first part of the paper is dedicated to the caselaw of the Court of Justice of the EU concerning the Member State’s possibility to apply a higher level of fundamental rights protection in comparison with the Charter, as well as to considerations as to the potential possibilities to apply the higher level of fundamental rights protection as a result of respecting the Member State’s national identity. The second part of the paper deals with the possibility of limiting the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter in order to protect the Member State’s national identity. In conclusion, the paper offers some summary considerations as to the Member States’ potential possibilities to apply a different level of fundamental rights protection from the point of view of the Court of Justice of the EU.
keywords: national identity; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; level of protection
references (11)
1. BESSELINK, Leonard F. M., 1998. Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union. In: Common Market Law Review. Vol. 35, no. 3, p. 629-680.
2. BOROWSKI, Martin, 2007. Limiting Clauses: On the Continental European Tradition of Special Limiting Clauses and the General Limiting of Art 52(1) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In: Legisprudence. Vol. 1, no. 2, p. 197-240.
3. CRAIG, Paul - DE BÚRCA, Gráinne, 2015. EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press..
4. KLAMERT, Marcus, 2014. The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. LENAERTS, Koen, 2012. Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. In: European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 8, no. 3, p. 375-403.
6. SARMIENTO, Daniel, 2013. Whos Afraid of the Charter? The Court of Justice, National Courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe. In: Common Market Law Review. Vol. 50, no. 5, p. 1267-1304.
7. SKOURIS, Vassilios, 2006. Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: The Challenge of Striking a Delicate Balance. In: European Business Law Review. Vol. 17, no. 2, p. 225-239.
8. VAN DROOGHENBROECK, Sébastien – RIZCALLAH, Cecilia, 2018. Article 52-1. Limitations aux droits garantis. In: PICOD, Fabrice et al., 2018. Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne. Commentaire article par article. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
9. VON BOGDANDY, Armin, 2011. Founding Principles. In: VON BOGDANDY, Armin a Jürgen BAST, zost., 2011. Principles of European Constitutional Law. 2. vyd. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
10. Von BOGDANDY, Armin a Stephan SCHILL, 2011. Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty. In: Common Market Law Review. Vol. 48, no. 5, p. 1417-1453.
11. WEILER, Joseph H. H.. Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Boundaries: On Standards and Values in the Protection of Human Rights. In NEUWAHL, Nanette A. a Allan ROSAS, zost., 1995. The European Union and Human Rights. Hague: Kluwer Law International, p. 51-76.
Národní identita členského štátu jako dôvod poskytnutia odlišnej miery ochrany základných práv v porovnaní s Chartou základných práv EÚ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
