AUC IURIDICA
AUC IURIDICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.

As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.

AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.

Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).

The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.

In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.

AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.

The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.

Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.

AUC IURIDICA, Vol 63 No 1 (2017), 67–90

A Regulatory Model to Choose the Appropriate Regulatory Tools

Mirko Pečarič

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2017.4
published online: 07. 03. 2017

abstract

This paper deals with regulatory quality that always depends also on human factors. While the latter are moulded in time and in their mutual enhancements, also the regulatory tools have the same characteristics. Because they change their meanings in time and place – while these changes are enhanced by other changes and contexts – this paper gives criteria for some regulatory tools that could have the same meanings in different jurisdictions. Due to the political, social, economic and cultural differences there cannot be present the same regulatory tools for the same problems or targets in different countries, but nevertheless there can be used the same approach or a model by which we could establish the most appropriate tool (that could be different in other jurisdictions) for solving similar situations. A proposed model favours a participatory “individual-collective” approach that can eliminate more bias than deliberative democracy or even by experts individually, because it is built on one of the basic cybernetic laws, i.e. of redundancy of command.

keywords: regulatory quality; regulatory tools; regulatory model; regulatory cycle; countries’ differences

references (42)

1. Accreditation Services International, ‘What Is the Difference between Certification and Accreditation?’<http://www.accreditation-services.com/archives/what-is-the-difference-between-certification-and-accreditation> accessed 14 November 2014

2. Alexander M, The Kondratiev Cycle: A Generational Interpretation (iUniverse 2002)

3. Baldwin R, Cave M and Lodge M, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2 edition, Oxford University Press 2013)

4. Beer S and Eno B, Think Before You Think: Social Complexity and Knowledge of Knowing (David Whittaker ed, Wavestone Press 2009)

5. Black HC, A Dictionary of Law: Containing Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern : Including the Principal Terms of International, Constitutional, and Commercial Law : With a Collection of Legal Maxims and Numerous Select Titles from the Civil Law and Other Foreign Systems (The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd 1891)

6. Brennan T, ‘Regulation and Competition as Complements’ in Michael A Crew and Menahem Spiegel (eds), Obtaining the best from Regulation and Competition (Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed 2005 edition, Springer 2010)

7. Breyer S, Regulation and Its Reform (Harvard University Press 1982)

8. Breyer SG and others, Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases (6 edition, Aspen Publishers 2006)

9. Cass RA and others, Administrative Law: Cases and Materials, Sixth Edition (6 edition, Aspen Publishers 2011)

10. Chapus R, Droit Administratif Général (Montchrestien 1996)

11. Citizens Union, ‘2010 CITY CHARTER REVISION RECOMMENDATIONS Increasing Avenues for Participation in Governing and Elections in New York City’

12. Coase RH, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1

13. Craig PP, Administrative Law (5th edition, Sweet & Maxwell 2003)

14. Directive, ‘Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the Award of Concession Contracts Text with EEA Relevance. OJ L 94, 28.3.2014.’

15. Directorate of Accreditation, ‘What Is the Difference between Accreditation and Certification Directorate of Accreditation’ (2011) <http://www.dpa.gov.al/en/faq/what-is-difference-between-accreditation-and-certification> accessed 14 November 2014

16. Douglas M, Cultural Bias (Humanities Pr 1978)

17. Dragos DC and Neamtu B (eds), Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law (2014 edition, Springer 2014)

18. Espejo R and Reyes A, Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable System Model (2011 edition, Springer 2011)

19. European Union, ‘Treaty Establishing the European Community (Consolidated Version), OJ C 325/35 of 24.12.2002.’

20. Foucault M, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (Reissue edition, Vintage Books 1978)

21. Friedman M, Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition (40 Anv edition, University Of Chicago Press 2002)

22. Harlow C and Rawlings R, Law and Administration (3 edition, Cambridge University Press 2009)

23. Hayek FA, The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition (Ronald Hamowy ed, The Collected Works of F A Hayek edition, University Of Chicago Press 2011)

24. Heritier A, ‘Conclusion: Refining Regulatory Regimes’ in David Coen and Adrienne Heritier (eds), Refining Regulatory Regimes: Utilities in Europe (Edward Elgar Pub 2006)

25. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ and Minkov M, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition (3 edition, McGraw-Hill 2010)

26. International Organization for Standardization, ‘About ISO’ <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about.htm>

27. Kauffman S, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity (Reprint edition, Oxford University Press 1996)

28. Moran M, The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation (Oxford University Press, USA 2003) CrossRef

29. Murray J, ‘Licenses and Permits’ (About, 2014) <http://biztaxlaw.about.com/od/glossaryl/g/licernsepermit.htm> accessed 14 November 2014

30. Newslow DL, The ISO 9000 Quality System: Applications in Food and Technology (John Wiley & Sons 2001)

31. OECD, ‘OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform, Regulatory Polices in OECD Countries, From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance.’

32. ——, ‘OECD Guiding Principles for Regulatory Quality and Performance’

33. ——, ‘Policy Framework for Effective and Efficient Financial Regulation’

34. Parisi F, The Economics of Lawmaking (Oxford University Press, USA 2008)

35. Popper A and others, Popper, McKee, Varona, and Harter’s Administrative Law: A Contemporary Approach, 2d (2 edition, West Academic Publishing 2010)

36. Senn M, Non-State Regulatory Regimes: Understanding Institutional Transformation (Springer 2014)

37. Stigler GA, ‘Comment on Joskow and Noll’ in Gary Fromm (ed), Studies in Public Regulation (MIT Press 1981)

38. The European Parliament and the Council, ‘Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on Services in the Internal Market OJ L 376, 27.12.2006.’

39. The Law Dictionary, ‘Register’ <http://thelawdictionary.org/register-2/>

40. UKAS, ‘About Accreditation’ (2014) <http://www.ukas.com/about-accreditation/default.asp> accessed 14 November 2014

41. Vogel SK, Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries (Cornell University Press 1998)

42. Wade W and Forsyth C, Administrative Law (9 edition, Oxford University Press 2004)

Creative Commons License
A Regulatory Model to Choose the Appropriate Regulatory Tools is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478

Download