PSYCHOLOGIE PRO PRAXI
PSYCHOLOGIE PRO PRAXI

From 2021, the journal is not published. The last published issue of the journal is issue 2/2020.

Psychologie pro praxi (Psychology for Practice) is academic journal focused on practical applications of psychological research and theory, particularly in psychology of work and organization, social psychology, and psychology of education.

PSYCHOLOGIE PRO PRAXI, Vol 55 No 1 (2020), 55–71

„Unáhlené závěry“ u psychotických onemocnění: přehledová studie

[“Hasty conclusions” in psychotic illnesses: a review study]

Mabel Rodriguez, Petra Šustová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366486.2021.7
published online: 30. 08. 2021

abstract

This narrative review describes the most frequently investigated cognitive bias in psychosis – jumping to conclusions. This bias refers to deviance in reasoning, when person reach to the conclusion on the basis of little evidence than it is usual. Experimental studies describe presence of the bias across all psychotic continuum. Jumping to conclusions is most frequently studied in associations with delusions, there are discrepancies between results from metaanalyses and longitudinal studies about the nature of relationship between those two phenomena. Relationship between cognition and this bias remains also unclear. Methodology of measuring this bias is very fragmented, which brings o lots of problems descibed in the article. Last part is dedicated to posibilities and efectivity of metacognitive training, which could lead to decrease in jumping to conclusion and potentially nonfarmacologicaly influence delusion and other positive symptoms.

keywords: hasty conclusions; psychosis; delusions; cognitive bias; schizophrenia

references (92)

1. <bez popisu> CrossRef

2. <bez popisu> CrossRef

3. <bez popisu> CrossRef

4. <bez popisu> CrossRef

5. <bez popisu> CrossRef

6. <bez popisu> CrossRef

7. <bez popisu> CrossRef

8. <bez popisu> CrossRef

9. <bez popisu> CrossRef

10. <bez popisu> CrossRef

11. <bez popisu> CrossRef

12. <bez popisu> CrossRef

13. <bez popisu> CrossRef

14. <bez popisu> CrossRef

15. <bez popisu> CrossRef

16. <bez popisu> CrossRef

17. <bez popisu> CrossRef

18. <bez popisu> CrossRef

19. <bez popisu> CrossRef

20. <bez popisu> CrossRef

21. <bez popisu> CrossRef

22. <bez popisu> CrossRef

23. <bez popisu> CrossRef

24. <bez popisu> CrossRef

25. <bez popisu> CrossRef

26. <bez popisu> CrossRef

27. <bez popisu> CrossRef

28. <bez popisu> CrossRef

29. <bez popisu> CrossRef

30. <bez popisu> CrossRef

31. <bez popisu> CrossRef

32. <bez popisu> CrossRef

33. <bez popisu> CrossRef

34. <bez popisu> CrossRef

35. <bez popisu> CrossRef

36. <bez popisu> CrossRef

37. <bez popisu> CrossRef

38. Irwin, H. J., Drinkwater, K., & Dagnall, N. (2014). Are believers in the paranormal inclined to jump to conclusions?. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 14(1), 69.

39. <bez popisu> CrossRef

40. <bez popisu> CrossRef

41. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases. New York: Plenum. CrossRef

42. <bez popisu> CrossRef

43. <bez popisu> CrossRef

44. <bez popisu> CrossRef

45. <bez popisu> CrossRef

46. <bez popisu> CrossRef

47. Maher, B. A. (1974). Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 98-113.

48. <bez popisu> CrossRef

49. <bez popisu> CrossRef

50. <bez popisu> CrossRef

51. <bez popisu> CrossRef

52. <bez popisu> CrossRef

53. <bez popisu> CrossRef

54. <bez popisu> CrossRef

55. <bez popisu> CrossRef

56. <bez popisu> CrossRef

57. <bez popisu> CrossRef

58. <bez popisu> CrossRef

59. <bez popisu> CrossRef

60. <bez popisu> CrossRef

61. Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. (2004). Plausibility judgment in schizophrenic patients: Evidence for a liberal acceptance bias. German Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 66-74.

62. <bez popisu> CrossRef

63. <bez popisu> CrossRef

64. <bez popisu> CrossRef

65. <bez popisu> CrossRef

66. <bez popisu> CrossRef

67. <bez popisu> CrossRef

68. <bez popisu> CrossRef

69. <bez popisu> CrossRef

70. <bez popisu> CrossRef

71. <bez popisu> CrossRef

72. <bez popisu> CrossRef

73. <bez popisu> CrossRef

74. <bez popisu> CrossRef

75. Roberts, D. L., Penn, D. L., & Combs, D. R. (2016). Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT): Group psychotherapy for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, clinician guide. Oxford University Press. CrossRef

76. <bez popisu> CrossRef

77. <bez popisu> CrossRef

78. <bez popisu> CrossRef

79. <bez popisu> CrossRef

80. Sandvik, K. (2015). Decision-making in schizophrenia. (Master thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.

81. <bez popisu> CrossRef

82. <bez popisu> CrossRef

83. <bez popisu> CrossRef

84. <bez popisu> CrossRef

85. <bez popisu> CrossRef

86. <bez popisu> CrossRef

87. <bez popisu> CrossRef

88. <bez popisu> CrossRef

89. <bez popisu> CrossRef

90. <bez popisu> CrossRef

91. <bez popisu> CrossRef

92. <bez popisu> CrossRef

Creative Commons License
„Unáhlené závěry“ u psychotických onemocnění: přehledová studie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

157 x 230 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 80 czk
ISSN: 1803-8670
E-ISSN: 2336-6486

Download