From 2021, the journal is not published. The last published issue of the journal is issue 2/2020.
Psychologie pro praxi (Psychology for Practice) is academic journal focused on practical applications of psychological research and theory, particularly in psychology of work and organization, social psychology, and psychology of education.
PSYCHOLOGIE PRO PRAXI, Vol 55 No 1 (2020), 55–71
„Unáhlené závěry“ u psychotických onemocnění: přehledová studie
[“Hasty conclusions” in psychotic illnesses: a review study]
Mabel Rodriguez, Petra Šustová
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366486.2021.7
published online: 30. 08. 2021
abstract
This narrative review describes the most frequently investigated cognitive bias in psychosis – jumping to conclusions. This bias refers to deviance in reasoning, when person reach to the conclusion on the basis of little evidence than it is usual. Experimental studies describe presence of the bias across all psychotic continuum. Jumping to conclusions is most frequently studied in associations with delusions, there are discrepancies between results from metaanalyses and longitudinal studies about the nature of relationship between those two phenomena. Relationship between cognition and this bias remains also unclear. Methodology of measuring this bias is very fragmented, which brings o lots of problems descibed in the article. Last part is dedicated to posibilities and efectivity of metacognitive training, which could lead to decrease in jumping to conclusion and potentially nonfarmacologicaly influence delusion and other positive symptoms.
keywords: hasty conclusions; psychosis; delusions; cognitive bias; schizophrenia
references (92)
1. <bez popisu> CrossRef
2. <bez popisu> CrossRef
3. <bez popisu> CrossRef
4. <bez popisu> CrossRef
5. <bez popisu> CrossRef
6. <bez popisu> CrossRef
7. <bez popisu> CrossRef
8. <bez popisu> CrossRef
9. <bez popisu> CrossRef
10. <bez popisu> CrossRef
11. <bez popisu> CrossRef
12. <bez popisu> CrossRef
13. <bez popisu> CrossRef
14. <bez popisu> CrossRef
15. <bez popisu> CrossRef
16. <bez popisu> CrossRef
17. <bez popisu> CrossRef
18. <bez popisu> CrossRef
19. <bez popisu> CrossRef
20. <bez popisu> CrossRef
21. <bez popisu> CrossRef
22. <bez popisu> CrossRef
23. <bez popisu> CrossRef
24. <bez popisu> CrossRef
25. <bez popisu> CrossRef
26. <bez popisu> CrossRef
27. <bez popisu> CrossRef
28. <bez popisu> CrossRef
29. <bez popisu> CrossRef
30. <bez popisu> CrossRef
31. <bez popisu> CrossRef
32. <bez popisu> CrossRef
33. <bez popisu> CrossRef
34. <bez popisu> CrossRef
35. <bez popisu> CrossRef
36. <bez popisu> CrossRef
37. <bez popisu> CrossRef
38. Irwin, H. J., Drinkwater, K., & Dagnall, N. (2014). Are believers in the paranormal inclined to jump to conclusions?. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 14(1), 69.
39. <bez popisu> CrossRef
40. <bez popisu> CrossRef
41. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases. New York: Plenum. CrossRef
42. <bez popisu> CrossRef
43. <bez popisu> CrossRef
44. <bez popisu> CrossRef
45. <bez popisu> CrossRef
46. <bez popisu> CrossRef
47. Maher, B. A. (1974). Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 98-113.
48. <bez popisu> CrossRef
49. <bez popisu> CrossRef
50. <bez popisu> CrossRef
51. <bez popisu> CrossRef
52. <bez popisu> CrossRef
53. <bez popisu> CrossRef
54. <bez popisu> CrossRef
55. <bez popisu> CrossRef
56. <bez popisu> CrossRef
57. <bez popisu> CrossRef
58. <bez popisu> CrossRef
59. <bez popisu> CrossRef
60. <bez popisu> CrossRef
61. Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. (2004). Plausibility judgment in schizophrenic patients: Evidence for a liberal acceptance bias. German Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 66-74.
62. <bez popisu> CrossRef
63. <bez popisu> CrossRef
64. <bez popisu> CrossRef
65. <bez popisu> CrossRef
66. <bez popisu> CrossRef
67. <bez popisu> CrossRef
68. <bez popisu> CrossRef
69. <bez popisu> CrossRef
70. <bez popisu> CrossRef
71. <bez popisu> CrossRef
72. <bez popisu> CrossRef
73. <bez popisu> CrossRef
74. <bez popisu> CrossRef
75. Roberts, D. L., Penn, D. L., & Combs, D. R. (2016). Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT): Group psychotherapy for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, clinician guide. Oxford University Press. CrossRef
76. <bez popisu> CrossRef
77. <bez popisu> CrossRef
78. <bez popisu> CrossRef
79. <bez popisu> CrossRef
80. Sandvik, K. (2015). Decision-making in schizophrenia. (Master thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
81. <bez popisu> CrossRef
82. <bez popisu> CrossRef
83. <bez popisu> CrossRef
84. <bez popisu> CrossRef
85. <bez popisu> CrossRef
86. <bez popisu> CrossRef
87. <bez popisu> CrossRef
88. <bez popisu> CrossRef
89. <bez popisu> CrossRef
90. <bez popisu> CrossRef
91. <bez popisu> CrossRef
92. <bez popisu> CrossRef
„Unáhlené závěry“ u psychotických onemocnění: přehledová studie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
157 x 230 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 80 czk
ISSN: 1803-8670
E-ISSN: 2336-6486
