Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 7 No 2 (2015), 9–26
The Nineteenth Century Revised: Towards a New Narrative of Europe’s Past
Bo Stråth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2015.9
published online: 17. 12. 2015
abstract
The conventional history of Europe, connecting the Enlightenment heritage with our time, makes a huge detour around the violent nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth one. The article explores the European peace utopias of 1815, 1918 and 1951, and their eventual loss of suggestive force, and argues that they link today’s global Europe to the post-Napoleonic world two hundred years ago. This connection, through a series of illusions and disillusions about the nature of politics, represents a different view on the nineteenth and twentieth century than the conventional teleological narrative about fulfilment of the Enlightenment promise of progress. The analysis of the bicentenary chain of shifts between postwar, prewar and war should not be read in terms of a teleology necessitating a new war; the point is, rather to draw attention to the fragility and openness of historical processes. The new narrative outlined here emphasizes that there was no necessity in the development towards today’s Europe; the story is full of alternatives, and highlights the role as well as the responsibility of human agency. No solution appears as a necessary result of impersonal forces, everything has depended, and continues to depend, on human choice.
keywords: Europe; integration; utopia; peace; Vienna; Versailles
references (29)
1. <bez popisu>
2. Anderson, Benedict [1983]. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
3. Brisku, Adrian [forthcoming]. The Illusory Politics of Change and Stability in the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1815–1914. London: Bloomsbury.
4. Brubaker, Rogers [1992]. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Gellner, Ernest [1983]. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6. Grotke, Kelly L. – Prutsch, Markus J. [2014]. Constitutionalism, Legitimacy and Power. Nineteenth-Century Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Hobsbawm, Eric [1990]. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hobsbawm, Eric [1992]. Ethnicity and Nationalism in Europe Today. Anthropology Today 8 (1): 3–8.
9. Hroch, Miroslav [1985]. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe.A Comparative Analysis of the SocialComposition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Kohn, Hans [1969 (1944)]. The Idea of Nationalism. A Study of Its Origins and Background. Toronto: Collier.
11. Koselleck, Reinhart [2003 (2000)]. Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik mit einem Beitrag von Hans-Georg Gadamer. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
12. Koskenniemi, Martti [2005]. From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Milward, Alan [1992]. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
14. Müller, Jan-Werner [2011]. Contesting Democracy. Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Müller, Jan-Werner [2015]. Was ist Populismus? Berlin: Suhrkamp.
16. Prutsch, Markus [forthcoming]. Crisis, Populace and Leadership. Reflections on the Discourse and Practice of 'Modern Caesarism' . London: Bloomsbury.
17. Renan, Ernest [1882]. Qu'est-ce qu'une nation? Conférence faite a la Sorbonne le 11 mars 1882. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
18. Riley, Dylan [2010]. The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe. Italy, Spain and Romania 1870–1945. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Schivelbusch, Wolfgang [2005] Entfernte Verwandtschaft. Faschismus, Nationalsozialismus, New Deal 1933–1939. Munich: Carl Hanser.
20. Smith, Anthony [1991]. National Identity. London: Penguin Books.
21. Strath, Bo [2015a]. Europe's Utopias of Peace: 1815, 1919, 1951. London: Bloomsbury.
22. Strath, Bo [2015b]. Paradoxes of Peace: Perpetual Peace as Irony, as Utopia and Political Practices. In. Hippler, Thomas – Vec, Miloš (eds.). Paradoxes of Peace in 19th Century Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Strath, Bo [2015c]. The Faces of Modernity: Crisis, Kairos, Chronos – Koselleck versus Hegel. In. Chakrabarty, Dipesh – Subrahmanyam, Sanjay – Trüper, Henning (eds.). Teleology and History: A Critical Assessment of an Enlightenment Thought. London: Bloomsbury.
24. Verdery, Catherine [1992]. Comment: Hobsbawm in the East. Anthropology Today 8 (1): 8–10.
25. Von Stein, Lorenz [1848 (1842)]. Der Sozialismus und Communismus des heutigen Frankreichs, vol. 1. Leipzig: Wiegand.
26. Von Stein, Lorenz [1855]. Das Königtum, die Republik und die Souveränität der französischen Gesellschaft seit der Februarrevolution 1848 (=Geschichte der Sozialen Bewegung in Frankreich von 1789 bis auf unsere Tage, vol. 30). Leipzig: Wiegand.
27. Weber, Max [1919]. Politik als Beruf. Munich: Duncker & Humblot.
28. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich [1969]. Bismarck und der Imperialismus. Cologne: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
29. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich [1977 (1973)]. Das Deutsche Kaiserreich 1871–1918. 3rd revised ed. Göttingen: Van denhoeck & Ruprecht.
The Nineteenth Century Revised: Towards a New Narrative of Europe’s Past is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
