Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 7 No 1 (2015), 9–23
The Society of Individuals: How to Solve the Dilemma of Individualism and Holism in Historical Sociology
Jiří Šubrt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2015.2
published online: 18. 06. 2016
abstract
One of the questions that Norbert Elias tries to resolve in his work – either explicitly or implicitly – is the issue of the relationship between the individual and society. Elias critically assesses two approaches to this issue that sociology offered in his time, namely the Weberian conception of individualism that postulates the human individual as the starting point of sociological thought, and the Durkheimian conception of holism, which considered society as a whole as the starting point, giving regard to holistic, supra-individual social facts. Elias considers both of these solutions one-sided and unsatisfactory, and in his conception tries to supercede them. His strategy is close to that of Georg Simmel before him. It consists in highlighting the “third” that lies between the individual and society, which connects them. Simmel calls this “third” “Wechselwirkung”. Elias speaks about “figuration”. In this article, we consider how successful Elias’ strategy is, its merits and its shortcomings. At the end of the text, the author attempts to formulate his own solution of the discussed problem, which is different from Elias’s approach and based on the concept of “homo duplex”.
keywords: individualism; holism; human individual; action; structure; figuration; homo duplex
references (34)
1. Alexander, Jeffrey C. [1987]. Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory Since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Archer, Margaret S. [1995]. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
3. Berger, Peter L. – Luckmann, Thomas [1999]. Sociální konstrukce reality: Pojednání o sociologii vědění. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
4. Bhaskar, Roy [1978]. On the Possibility of Social Scientific Knowledge and the Limits of Naturalism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior (8): 1–28. CrossRef
5. Boltanski, Luc – Thévenot, Laurent [2007]. Über die Rechtfertigung: Eine Soziologie der Kritischen Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre [1998]. Teorie jednání. Praha: Karolinum.
7. Durkheim, Émile [1913]. Le probléme religieux et la dualité de la nature humaine. Bulletin de la Société Francaise de la Philosophie XIII: 63–113.
8. Durkheim, Émile [1914]. La dualisme de la nature humaine et ses conditions sociales. Scientia XV: 206–222.
9. Durkheim, Émile [1926]. Pravidla sociologické metody. Praha: Orbis.
10. Durkheim, Émile [1995]. Dualismus lidské přirozenosti a její společenské podmínky. Antropologie, sociologie, historie. Cahiers du CEFRES, March, 8: 16–34.
11. Durkheim, Émile [2002]. Elementární formy náboženského života: Systém totemismu v Austrálii. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
12. Elias, Norbert [1970]. Was ist Soziologie? München: Juventa Verlag.
13. Elias, Norbert [1983]. Die höfische Gesellchaft: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
14. Elias, Norbert – Scotson, John L. [1990]. Etablierte und Außenseiter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
15. Elias, Norbert [1991]. Mozart, Zur Soziologie eines Genies. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
16. Elias, Norbert [2006a]. O procesu civilizace: Sociogenetické a psychogenetické studie. Díl I. Proměny chování světských horních vrstev na Západě. Praha: Argo.
17. Elias, Norbert [2006b]. Spoločnosť indivíduí. Bratislava: Kalligram.
18. Elias, Norbert [2007]. O procesu civilizace: Sociogenetické a psychogenetické studie. Díl II. Proměny společnosti. Nástin teorie civilizace. Praha: Argo.
19. Fay, Brian [2002]. Současná filosofie sociálních věd: Multikulturní přístup. Praha: SLON.
20. Gabriel, Norman – Mennell, Stephen (eds.) [2011]. Norbert Elias and Figurational Sociology: Processual Thinking in Sociology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
21. Giddens, Anthony [1984]. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
22. Habermas, Jorg [1981]. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 1, 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
23. Keller, Jan [2004]. Dějiny klasické sociologie. Praha: SLON.
24. Latour, Bruno [2005]. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Layder, Derek [1994]. Understanding Social Theory. London: Sage.
26. Michles, Robert [1931]. Strany a vůdcové: k sociologii politického stranictví. Praha: Orbis.
27. Mouzelis, Nicos [2006]. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? London, New York: Routledge.
28. Noiriel, Gérard [2012]. Úvod do sociohistorie. Praha: SLON.
29. Pareto, Vilfredo [1968]. The Rise and Fall of the Elites. Totowa (New Jersey): The Bedminster Press.
30. Parsons, Talcott [1966]. The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: The Free Press.
31. Simmel, Georg [1970]. Grundfragen der Sociologie (Individuum und Gesellschaft). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
32. Weber, Max [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
33. Weber, Max [1988]. Ueber einige Kategorie der verstehenden Soziologie. In. Weber Max: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Sibeck), pp. 427–474.
34. Weber, Max [1998]. Základní sociologické pojmy. In. Weber Max Metodologie, sociologie a politika. Praha: OIKOYMENH, pp. 135–171.
The Society of Individuals: How to Solve the Dilemma of Individualism and Holism in Historical Sociology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
