Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 2 No 1 (2010), 81–101
Sociální konflikty a revoluce v historické sociologii Michaela Manna, Charlese Tillyho a Thedy Skocpolové
[Social Conflicts and Revolutions in Historical Sociology of Michael Mann, Charles Tilly and Theda Skocpol]
Stanislav Holubec
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2017.65
published online: 10. 10. 2017
abstract
Michael Mann, Charles Tilly a Theda Skocpol belong to the leading personalities of the US “New historical sociology” in 80s. The main goal of the article is to present the ideas and thinking of these three, in Czech academic sphere, relatively unknown authors and try to outline the comparison of their approaches. Based on analysis of their works and the secondary literature on them, I show that all of the authors connect a modernist approach, interest for the social change, inspiration by Marx and Weber and the revision of their thinking. On the other hand, there are significant differences among them based on their topics (in sense of space and time), interests for a different social processes and methods. The main difference lies in macro or micro- historical approach. The first we find in the works by Mann, the second dominates the works by Tilly. Skocpol could be put in the middle position.
keywords: historical sociology; Charles Tilly; Michael Mann; Theda Skocpol; New historical sociology
references (20)
1. Abrahams, Philip. [1982]. Historical Sociology. Ithaca – New York: Cornell University Press.
2. Anderson, Perry. [1974]. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: Verso.
3. Hroch, Miroslav. [1999]. V národním zájmu: požadavky a cíle evropských národních hnutí devatenáctého století ve srovnávací perspektivě. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
4. Hunt, Lynn. [1984]. Charles Tilly's Collective Action. In. Skocpol, Theda. (ed.). Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press, s. 244–275. CrossRef
5. Krejčí, Jaroslav. [2002]. Postižitelné proudy dějin: civilizace a sociální formace, struktury a procesy, kultura a politika, revoluce a renesance, náboženství, národy a státy. Praha: SLON.
6. Mann, Michael. [1986]. The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to A. D. 1760. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
7. Mann, Michael. [1993]. The Sources of Social Power: The Rise of Classes and Nation-states, 1760–1914. Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
8. Machačová, Jana – Matějček, Jiří. [2002]. Nástin sociálního vývoje českých zemí 1781–1914. Opava: Slezské zemské muzeum.
9. Sanderson, Stephen K. [2005]. Revolution: A Worldwide Interduction to Political and Social Change. London: Paradigm Publishers.
10. Skocpol, Theda. [1979]. States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
11. Skovajsa, Marek. [2008]. Když sociologie potkala historii: Charles Tilly (1929–2008). Sociologický časopis 44 (2008), č. 4, s. 800–807.
12. Smith, Daniel. [1991]. The Rise of Historical Sociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13. Smith, Daniel. [2006]. Historická sociální teorie. In. Harrington Austin a kol. Moderní sociální teorie: základní témata a myšlenkové proudy. Praha: Portál, s. 189–214.
14. Spohn, Willfried. [2005]. Neue Historische Soziologie: Charles Tilly, Theda Skocpol, Michael Mann. In. Kaesler, Dirk. (ed.). Aktuelle Theorien der Soziologie. München: Beck, s. 196–230.
15. Šubrt, Jiří. [2001]. Postavy a problémy soudobé sociologie. Soudobé teorie druhé poloviny 20. století. Praha: ISV nakladatelství.
16. Tilly Charles. [2005]. Popular Contention in Great Britain 1758–1834. Boulder – London: Paradigm Publishers, 2. přepracované vydání (1. vydání Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).
17. Tilly, Charles. [1993]. Die europäischen Revolutionen. München: Beck.
18. Tilly, Charles. [2006]. Politika kolektivního násilí. Praha: SLON.
19. Wickham, Chris. [1988]. Historical Materialism, Historical Sociology. New Left Review, No. 1/171 (1988), s. 63–78.
20. Znebejánek, František. [1997]. Sociální hnutí. Praha: SLON.
Sociální konflikty a revoluce v historické sociologii Michaela Manna, Charlese Tillyho a Thedy Skocpolové is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
