Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 17 No 1 (2025), 115–148
Research Program, Paradigm or Problematic? Three Ways of Reading Max Weber
Jóhann Páll Árnason
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2025.7
published online: 23. 07. 2025
abstract
This paper discusses ways of understanding the unity of Max Weber’s work and argues that the concept of problematic is more suitable than those commonly used in contemporary philosophy of science, such as paradigm or research program. The concept of problematic implies a less closed and integrated framework than the other two; it also places more emphasis on the problems of conceptualization. All these features make it a more adequate key to Max Weber’s eminently multi-disciplinary and multi-perspectivistic but very unfinished project. The reference to a problematic connotes both strengths and weaknesses; the strengths have to do with Weber’s exceptional ability to tackle diverse domains of research and theorizing in an original and productive way, the weaknesses with unclear connections between them and with insufficient grounding in basic concepts. These claims are backed up by closer examination of Weber’s sociology of rule, especially his analysis of changing historical relations between political and religious power. Insights gained through this approach to the political sphere can then serve to conceptualize the cultural and economic ones in a way that builds on Weber’s work but goes beyond its historically conditioned horizons.
keywords: Max Weber; paradigm; research program; problematic; rule; religion; culture
references (41)
1. Adams, Suzi - Smith, Jeremy C. A. (eds.) [2019]. Social Imaginaries: Critical Interventions. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
2. Adorno, Theodor [1966]. Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
3. Althusser, Louis [1969]. Pour Marx. Paris: Maspero.
4. Arnason, Johann P. [1976]. Zwischen Natur und Gesellschaft. Studien zu einer kritischen Theorie des Subjekts. Köln: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
5. Arnason, Johann P. [1988]. Praxis und Interpretation. Sozialphilosophische Studien. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
6. Arnason, Johann P. [2014]. The religio-political nexus. Historical and comparative reflections. In. Arnason, Johann P. - Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel (eds.). Religion and Politics: European and Global Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 8-36. CrossRef
7. Arnason, Johann P. [2020a]. From Occidental rationalism to multiple modernities. In. Hanke, Edith - Scaff, Lawrence - Whimster, Sam (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Max Weber. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 498-518. CrossRef
8. Arnason, Johann P. [2020b]. The Labyrinth of Modernity. Horizons, Pathways, Mutations. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
9. Arnason, Johann P. [2021]. Civilizations and economies: Notes on a neglected theme. In. Endres, Kirsten W. - Kaneff, Deema (eds.). Explorations in Economic Anthropology. New York - Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 19-34. CrossRef
10. Arnason, Johann P. [2023]. Interpretations and counter-arguments. Reply to my interlocutors. International Journal of Social Imaginaries 2 (1): 160-175. CrossRef
11. Assmann, Jan [2000]. Herrschaft und Heil.Politische Theologie in Altägypten, Israel und Europa. München: Hanser.
12. Bachelard, Gaston [2024 (1949)]. Le rationalisme appliqué. Paris: PUF.
13. Basso, Michele [2021]. La città, alba dell'Occidente. Macerata: Quodlibet.
14. Blumenberg, Hans [2001]. Licht als Metapher der Wahrheit. Im Vorfeld der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. In. Blumenberg, Hans. Ästhetische und metaphorologische Schriften. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 139-171.
15. Breuer, Stefan [1993]. Max Webers Staatssoziologie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45 (1): 199-219.
16. Breuer, Stefan [2014]. Der charismatische Staat. Ursprünge und Frühformen staatlicher Herrschaft. Freiburg: Herder.
17. Collins, Randall [1986]. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Dumont, Louis [1966]. Homo hierarchicus. Essai sur le système des castes. Paris: Gallimard.
19. Ghosh, Peter [2014]. Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic. Twin Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Hanke, Edith [2022]. Max Webers Sprache. Neue Einblicke in das Gesamtwerk. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
21. Heather, Peter [2022]. Christendom. The Triumph of a Religion. London: Allen Lane.
22. Joas, Hans [1996]. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
23. Lagerwey, John [2010]. China: A Religious State? Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
24. Lakatos, Imre - Musgrave, Alan (eds.) [1972]. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lepsius, M. Rainer [2003]. Eigenart und Potenzial des Weber-Paradigmas. In. Albert, Gert - Bienfait, Agathe - Sigmund, Steffen - Wendt, Claus (eds.). Das Weber-Paradigma. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 32-41.
26. Luhmann, Niklas [1984]. Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
27. Luhmann, Niklas [1997]. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
28. Maniglier, Patrice [2012]. What is a problematic? Radical Philosophy 173: 21-23.
29. Marra, Realino [2022]. L'eredità di Mx Weber. Cultura, diritto e realtà. Milano: Il Mulino.
30. Mommsen, Wolfgang [1974]. Max Weber.Gesellschaft, Politik und Geschichte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Mommsen, Wolfgang [1983]. Rationalisierung und Mythos bei Max Weber. In. Bohrer, Karl (ed.). Mythos und Moderne. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 382-402.
31. Poggi, Gianfranco [1972]. Images of Society. Essays on the Sociological Theories of Tocqueville, Marx and Durkheim. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
32. Pye, Lucian [1985]. Asian Power and Politics. The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Boston/MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Radnitzky, Gerard [1968]. Contemporary Schools of Metascience, I-II. Göteborg: Akademiförlaget.
34. Scharfstein, Ben-Ami [1978]. Three philosophical civilizations. A preliminary comparison. In. Scharfstein, Ben-Ami (ed.). Philosophy East, Philosophy West. A Critical Comparison of Indian, Chinese, Islamic and European Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
35. Schluchter, Wolfgang [2005]. Handlung, Ordnung und Kultur: Grundzüge eines weberianischen Forschungsprogramms. In. Schluchter, Wolfgang. Handlung, Ordnung und Kultur. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 7-36.
36. Schwinn, Thomas [2020]. Klassikerdämmerung. 100 Jahre Max Weber im Kontext der Soziologiegeschichte und des aktuellen Zustandes unserer Disziplin. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 72 (2): 351-381. CrossRef
37. Sokoll, Thomas [2020]. Zwerge am Fuss des Riesen. Max Webers Protestantische Ethik und die Historiker. Vierteljahresschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 107: 441-494. CrossRef
38. Staudinger, Hans [1982]. Wirtschaftspolitik im Weimarer Staat. Bonn: Neue Gesellschaft.
39. Vidal-Naquet, Pierre [1981]. Le chasseur noir. Formes de pensée et formes de société dans le monde grec. Paris: Maspero.
40. Wagner, Peter [2008]. Modernity as Experience and Interpretation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. Weber, Max [2019]. Economy and Society. A New Translation. Edited and translated by Keith Tribe. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.
Research Program, Paradigm or Problematic? Three Ways of Reading Max Weber is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
