Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 10 No 1 (2018), 11–26
Is It Still Too Early to Tell? Rethinking Sociology’s Relations to the French Revolution
David Inglis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2018.36
published online: 28. 06. 2018
abstract
It seems almost impossible today to deny the importance of the French Revolution in creating both the distinctively modern social world and sociology’s characteristic responses to it. This paper takes issue with various of the standard narrations of these matters. It aims at developing fresh thinking about what the Revolution was, and what roles it may, or may not have, played in generating subsequent social phenomena and the sociology tasked with comprehending them. The claim by Robert Nisbet that the roots of sociology especially lie in Conservative responses to the Revolution are critically assessed. The potential importance of Durkheim and de Tocqueville for creating new narrations of the connections between the Revolution and sociology are considered. The manners in which the Revolution has been invoked to construct concepts of “modernity” and dramatic historical breaks with the past are reflected upon.
keywords: Revolution; French Revolution; Sociology; History; Historical Sociology; Durkheim; de Tocqueville
references (44)
1. Arendt, Hannah [1973]. On Revolution. London: Pelican.
2. Arnason, Johann P. [1989]. The Imaginary Constitution of Modernity. Revue Europeenne des Sciences Sociales 27: 323−37.
3. Aron, Raymond [1965]. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. London: Pelican.
4. Baehr, Peter [2002]. Founders, Classics, Canons. New Brunswick: Transaction.
5. Berlin, Isaiah [2000]. The Roots of Romanticism. London: Pimlico.
6. Censer, Jack – Hunt, Lynn [2005]. Imaging the French Revolution. American Historical Review 110: 38–45.
7. De Tocqueville, Alexis [2008 (1856)]. The Ancien Regime and the Revolution. London: Penguin.
8. Dubois, Laurent [2000]. La Republique Metissee: Citizenship, Colonialism and the Borders of French History. Cultural Studies 14: 15–34. CrossRef
9. Durkheim, Emile [2001 (1912)]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. [2004]. The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity: Modernity as a Distinct Civilization. In. Arjomand, Said – Tiryakian, Edward A. (eds.). Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. London: Sage.
11. Engels, Friedrich [1959]. Anti-Duhring. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
12. Engels, Friedrich [1968]. Socialism, Utopian and Scientific. In. Marx / Engels: Selected Works. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
13. Evans, Mary [2006]. A Short History of Society. London: McGraw Hill.
14. Fukuyama, Francis [1992]. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.
15. Furet, Francois [1981]. Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Furet, Francois [1988]. Marx and the French Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Giddens, Anthony [1976]. Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 81: 703–729. CrossRef
18. Go, Julian [2013]. For a Postcolonial Sociology. Theory and Society 42: 25–55. CrossRef
19. Goldberg, Chad Alan [2011]. The Jews, the Revolution, and the Old Regime in French Anti-Semitism and Durkheim's Sociology. Sociological Theory 29: 248–271. CrossRef
20. Goldhammer, Jesse [2005]. The Headless Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
21. Harison, Casey [2002]. Teaching the French Revolution. The History Teacher 35: 137–162. CrossRef
22. Hawthorn, Geoffrey [1976]. Enlightenment and Despair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Heilbron, Johan [1995]. The Rise of Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24. Himmelstein, Jerome L. [1981] Review: The Two Nisbets: The Ambivalence of Contemporary Conservatism. Social Forces 60: 231–236. CrossRef
25. Inglis, David [2015]. Co je dnes v sociologii obhajitelne? Prezentismus, historicka vize a proč je sociologie užitečna. Historical Sociology 1: 20–24.
26. Kouvelakis, Stathis [2003]. Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx. London: Verso.
27. Krause, Alison [2016]. "Western Hegemony" in the Social Sciences: Fields and Model Systems. Sociological Review Monograph Series 64: 194–211.
28. Krejči, Jaroslav [2004] The Paths of Civilization: Understanding the Currents of History. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
29. Kumar, Krishan [1986]. Prophecy and Progress. London: Pelican.
30. Latour, Bruno [1993]. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31. Levine, Donald N. [1995]. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. MacVarish, Kathryn [2005]. Illusions of Revolution: Francois Furet's Critique of Marx. History of European Ideas 31: 491–508. CrossRef
33. Marcuse, Herbert [1963]. Reason and Revolution. London: Routledge.
34. Martindale, Don [1967]. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. London: Routledge.
35. Mazlish, Bruce [1989]. A New Science: The Breakdown of Connections and the Birth of Sociology. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
36. Netter, Marie-Laurence [2003]. Raymond Aron and the French Revolution. European Journal of Political Theory 2: 373–382. CrossRef
37. Nisbet, Robert [1943]. The French Revolution and the Rise of Sociology in France. American Journal of Sociology 49: 136–164. CrossRef
38. Nisbet, Robert [1952]. Conservatism and Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 58: 167–175. CrossRef
39. Nisbet, Robert [1974]. The Social Philosophers. London: Paladin.
40. Nisbet, Robert [1980]. The Sociological Tradition. London: Heinemann.
41. Sewell, William F. [1999]. Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology. In. McDonald, Terence J. (ed.). The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.
42. Toynbee, Arnold J. [1967]. A Study of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Wallerstein, Immanuel [1987]. World-Systems Analysis. In. Giddens, Anthony – Turner, Jonathan (eds.). Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity.
44. Wood, Ellen Meiksins [1999]. The Origin of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Is It Still Too Early to Tell? Rethinking Sociology’s Relations to the French Revolution is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
