Interdisciplinary journal focusing primarily on sociological, political science and historical perspectives on the issue of long-term social processes and trends, modernization, globalization tendency and impacts.
The journal creates a broader platform for researches in the historical social sciences. Epistemological field is not strictly bounded, it is also meant to overlap with civilizationalism, cultural sociology and other related fields.
Historical Sociology is Open Access Journal and all published papers are available in the archive section. Open access journal means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Published by Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, cooperated with Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague.
Reviewed scientific journal issued twice a year (in June and December).
The journal is abstracted and indexed in CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.
The journal is archived in Portico.
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 1 No 1 (2009), 97–121
Anatomie náboženského terorismu a globální rebelie proti sekulárnímu (ne)řádu
[Anatomy of Religion Terrorism and Global Rebellion against Secular (Dis)order]
Karel Černý
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2017.55
published online: 09. 10. 2017
abstract
Is the world today facing the clash of civilizations (S. Huntington), the end of history (F. Fukuyama) or rather the global-scale clash between secular and religious nationalism within the borders of particular nation states (M. Juergensmeyer)? The article critically introduces and discusses Mark Juergensmeyer’s comparative analyses of religious nationalist movements from all over the world and from all the main religious traditions: Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Shia, Sunni, Sikh, Buddhist and Hindu. The paper puts Mark Juergensmeyer’s analyses into the bro-ader context of the secularization and desecularization debate which the analyses are part of. The world according to Juergensmeyer is not facing the socalled “clash of civilizations” that Samuel Huntington’s famous thesis implicates but instead a global rebellion against the secular state and secular (dis)order. This conflict – sometimes violent, but primarily a nonviolent clash between secular and religious nationalism – is going on inside the borders of particular nation states and inside particular “civilizations”. Religious nationalism is a new form of nationalism, gro-wing since the 1970s, as a consequence of the crisis of secular ideologies and failures of secular political movements. Juergensmeyer’s research is based on almost thirty years of field research, on several case studies, and on interviews with more than one hundred activists in religious nationalist movements (ordinary members as well as high ranking leaders, mainstream religious nationalist movements as well as terrorist and militant ones).
keywords: religious nationalism; desecularization; religious terrorism; the new cold war
references (32)
1. Antoňjan, Jurij M. [2004]. Ličnosť terrorista i vaprosy borby s terrorismom. In. Kudrjavcev, Vladimir, N. (ed.). Borba s terrorismom. Moskva: Nauka, s. 93–108.
2. Bauman, Zygmunt. [2002]. Modernita a holocaust. Bratislava: Kaligram.
3. Berger, Peter L. [1997]. Vzdálená sláva. Hledání víry ve věku lehkověrnosti. Brno: Barrister & Principal.
4. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. [1993]. Bez kontroly. Chaos v předvečer 21. století. Praha: Victoria Publishing.
5. Fukuyama, Francis. [2002]. Konec dějin a poslední člověk. Praha: Rybka Publisher.
6. Gombár, Eduard. [2001]. Dramatický půlměsíc. Sýrie, Libye a Írán v procesu transformace. Praha: Karolinum.
7. Halík, Tomáš. [2007]. O Bohu a politice. Respekt 18, 17. prosince 2007, č. 51–52, s. 56–59.
8. Halík, Tomáš. [2003]. Globalizace a náboženství. In. Mezřický, Václav. (ed.) Globalizace. Praha: Portál, s. 133–147.
9. Hamilton, Malcolm B. [2001]. The Sociology of Religion: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. London – New York: Routledge.
10. Hobsbawm, Eric – Ranger, Terence. (eds.) [2000]. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Horgan, John. [2005]. The Psychology of Terrorism. London – New York: Routledge. CrossRef
12. Huntington, Samuel P. [1993]. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72, Summer 1993, No. 3, s. 22–49.
13. Huntington, Samuel. [2001]. Střet civilizací. Praha: Rybka Publishers.
14. Inglehart, Ronald – Norris, Pippa. [2004]. Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [1994]. The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2000]. Terror in the Mind of God. The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2004]. Is Religion the Problem? The Hedgehog Review 6, Spring 2004, No. 1, s. 21–33.
18. Juergensmeyer, Mark. (ed.). [2006]. The Oxford Handbook of Global Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
19. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2006b]. From Bhindranwale to Bin Laden: A Search for Understanding Religious Violence. In. Cady Linnel E. – Simon, Sheldon W. (eds.) Religion and Conflict in Asia: Disrupting Violence. London: Routledge, s. 21–30.
20. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2007]. Gandhi vs. Terrorism. Daedalus 136, Winter 2007, No. 1, s. 30–39.
21. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2008]. Global Rebelion. Religious Challenges to the Secular State, from Christian Militias to al Qaeda. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2008b]. Religious Nationalism and Transnationalism in a Global World. dostupné na Mark Juergensmeyer.com., <http://www.juergensmeyer.com/files/Relig%20natlism-trans.doc> [16. 10. 2008]
23. Juergensmeyer, Mark. [2008c]. Jak myslí teroristé. (rozhovor s Karlem Černým). Respekt 19, 25. listopad 2008, č. 47, s. 50–53.
24. Kepel, Giles. [1996]. Boží pomsta. Křesťané, židé a muslimové znovu dobývají svět. Brno: Atlantis.
25. Lužný, Dušan. [1999]. Náboženství a moderní společnost. Sociologické teorie modernizace a sekularizace. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
26. Moghadam, A. [2003]. A Global Resurgence of Religion? Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Working Paper No. 03-03, September 2003, <http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/723_Moghadam03_03.pdf> [16. 10. 2008]
27. Post, Jerrold M. [2004]. Leaders and their Followers in a Dangerous World: The Psychology of Political Behavior. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
28. Robertson, Roland. [2006]. Antiglobal Religions? In. Juergensmeyer, Mark. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Global Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 611–623.
29. Roy, Oliver. [2004]. Globalized Islam. The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Stark, Rodney. [1999] Secularization, R. I. P – Rest in Peace. Sociology of Religion 60, Fall 1999, No. 3, s. 249–273.
31. Swatos, William H., Jr. [1999]. Secularization Theory: The Course of a Concept. Sociology of Religion 60, Fall 1999, No. 3, s. 209–228.
32. Trebin, M. P. [2004]. Terrorizm v XXI. veke. Minsk: Kharvest.
Anatomie náboženského terorismu a globální rebelie proti sekulárnímu (ne)řádu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 120 czk
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525
