We are pleased to share that the AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.6 in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2023. AUC Geographica ranks (JCI) in Q3 in Geography.
AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.
AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.
Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31
All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.
AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.
Journal metrics 2022
Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.6
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.24
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography
Cite Score: 1.1
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences
The journal is archived in Portico.
AUC GEOGRAPHICA, Vol 58 No 1 (2023), 113–128
Different forms of innovation leadership in the strategic planning of municipalities in the structurally affected regions of Czechia
published online: 16. 06. 2023
This paper examines different forms of leadership in strategic planning in structurally affected regions of Czechia. Based on the leadership concepts and strategic planning in municipalities, evaluates different leadership approaches according to the population size of municipalities and the stability/continuity of municipal representatives. Four types of leaders were identified, with entrepreneurial leadership being the most important in all examined regions. The dependence of the types of leadership on the stability/ continuity of government in strategic planning was revealed, while, the dependence on the population size of municipalities was no. The importance of entrepreneurial leadership increases with the increasing number of electoral cycles elected leaders remain in office.
keywords: leadership; strategic planning; municipalities; structurally affected regions; Czechia
1. Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008): Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4), 543-571. CrossRef
2. Bass, B. M. (1990): From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics 18(3), 19-31. CrossRef
3. Beer, A., Ayres, S., Clower, T., Faller, F., Sancino, A., Sotarauta, M. (2019): Place leadership and regional economic development: a framework for cross-regional analysis. Regional studies 53(2), 171-182. CrossRef
4. Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Trippl, M. (2019): The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies 28(8), 1455-1473. CrossRef
5. Blažek, J. Květoň, V. (2021): From coal-mining to data-mining: the role of leadership in the emergence of a regional innovation system in an old industrial region, in Handbook on City and Regional Leadership. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, 168-186. CrossRef
6. Blažek, J., Květoň, V. (2022): Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional development: the case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies. CrossRef
7. Blažek, J., Vozáb, J. (2006): Ex-ante evaluation in the new member states: The case of the Czech Republic. Regional Studies 40(2), 237-248. CrossRef
8. Blažek, J., Vozáb, J. (2004): Institutional, organizational and programming context for support of regional development in the Czech Republic: a critique. Czech Geography at The Dawn of the Millenium. Palacky University Olomouc: 255-268.
9. Binek, J., Chmelař, R., Šilhan, Z., Svobodová, H., Synková, K., Šerý, O., Galvasová, I., Bárta, D. (2015): Integrated Territorial Development Tools, Garep. Brno.
10. Caceres, A. P., Santos, P. R., Wright, G., Belderrain, M. C. N. (2019): Soft situational strategic planning (SSSP): A method and case study of its application in a Brazilian municipality. Journal of the Operational Research Society 71(3), 363-380. CrossRef
11. Denhardt, J.V., Campbell, K.B. (2009): The Role of Democratic Values in Transformational Leadership. Administration & Society 38(5), 556-572. CrossRef
12. Grabher, G., Stark, D. (1997): Organizing diversity: Evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies 31(5), 533-544. CrossRef
13. Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. (2002): Entrepreneurial Leadership: Developing a Cross-cultural Construct. Journal of Business Venturing 19(2), 241-260. CrossRef
14. Gustafsson, S., Päivärinne, S., Hjelm, O. (2019): Strategic spatial planning - a missed opportunity to facilitate district heating systems based on excess heat. European Planning Studies 27(9), 1709-1726. CrossRef
15. Hlaváček, P. (2012): Actors and mechanisms of regional development. Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem. Ústí nad Labem.
16. Horlings, L. G., Roep, D., Wellbrock, V. (2018): The role of leadership in place-based development and building institutional arrangements. Local Economy 33(3), 245-268. CrossRef
17. Johnsen, A. (2016): Strategic Planning and Management in Local Government in Norway: Status after Three Decades 39(4), 333-365. CrossRef
18. Kaufman, J. L., Jacobs, H. M. (2007): A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 53(1), 23-33. CrossRef
19. Kuratko, D. F. (2007): Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 13(4), 1-11. CrossRef
20. Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., Steijn, B. (2010): Trust in governance networks; its impacts on outcomes. Administration & Society 42(2), 193-221. CrossRef
21. Klijn, E. H., B. Steijn, Edelenbos, J. (2010): The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks. Public Administration 88(4), 1063-2082. CrossRef
22. Krbová, J. (2017): Strategic Planning in Public Administration. Wolters Kluwer CZ. Prague.
23. Leong, L. C., Fischer, R. (2011): Is Transformational Leadership Universal? A Meta-Analytical Investigation of Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Means Across Cultures. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 18(2), 164-174. CrossRef
24. Lewis, J. M., Ricard, J. M., Klijn, E. H. (2018): How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences 84(2), 288-307. CrossRef
25. Lněnička, L. (2016): Strategic planning as a part of project culture of municipalities in the Czechia. Geografické informácie 20(2), 252-262. CrossRef
26. Marks-Bielska, R., Lizińska, W., Wojarska, M., Babuchowska, K. (2020): Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 15(3), 463-487. CrossRef
27. Moynihan, D. P., Wright, B. E., Pandey, S. K. (2012): Working within Constraints: Can Transformational Leaders Alter the Experience of Red Tape? International Public Management Journal 15(3), 315-336. CrossRef
28. Pablo, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R., Casebeer, A. L. (2007): Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector. Journal of Management Studies 44(5), 687-708. CrossRef
29. Pandey, S. K., Wright, B. E. (2010): Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (1), 75-89. CrossRef
30. Pileček, J., Chromý, P., Jančák, V. (2013): Social Capital and Local Socio-economic Development: The Case of Czech Peripheries. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 104(5), 604-620. CrossRef
31. Poister, T.H., Streib, G. (2005): Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: Status after Two Decades. Public Administration Review 65(1), 45-56. CrossRef
32. Rumpel, P., Slach, O., Koutský, J. (2008): Měkké faktory regionálního rozvoje. Aleš Čeněk. Pilsen. In Czech.
33. Řehoř, P. (2015): How to improve strategic planning of municipal organizations in Czech Republic? Procedia Economics and Finance 34(1), 521-527. CrossRef
34. Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., Ysa, T. (2017): Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: a comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review 19(2), 134-156. CrossRef
35. Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N. (2019): Place leadership and the challenge of transformation: policy platforms and Innovation ecosystems in promotion of green growth. European Planning Studies 27(9), 1748-1767. CrossRef
36. Swianiewicz, P., Lackowska, M., Hanssen, G. S. (2018): Local Leadership in Climate Change Policies. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 53, 67-83. CrossRef
37. Van Dierendonck, D. (2011): Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management 37(4), 1228-1261. CrossRef
38. Van Wart, M. (2013): Lessons from Leadership Theory and the Contemporary Challenges of Leaders. Public Administration Review 73(4), 553-565. CrossRef
39. Vozáb, J. (2007): Evolution of the Czech Regional Policy in the Context of the EU Regional Policy. 2nd Regional Development and Governance Symposium. Izmir.
40. Tietjen, A., Jørgensen, G. (2016): Translating a wicked problem: A strategic planning approach to rural shrinkage in Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 154, 29-43. CrossRef
41. Tummers, L. G., Knies, E. (2013): Leadership and Meaningful Work in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review 73(6), 859-868. CrossRef
42. Sotarauta, M., Horlings, L., Liddle, J. (2014): Leadership and Change in Sustainable Regional Development. Routeledge. Oxfordshire.
43. Wokoun, R., Malinovský, J., Damborský, M., Blažek, J. (2008): Regional Development. Linde Prague, Prague.
44. Wokoun, R., Mates, P., Kadeřábková, J. (2011): Basics of Regional Sciences and Public Administration. Aleš Čeněk. Pilsen.
Different forms of innovation leadership in the strategic planning of municipalities in the structurally affected regions of Czechia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
210 x 297 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 200 czk