We are pleased to share that the AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.6 in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2023. AUC Geographica ranks (JCI) in Q3 in Geography.
AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.
AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.
Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31
All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.
AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.
Journal metrics 2022
Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.6
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.24
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography
Cite Score: 1.1
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences
The journal is archived in Portico.
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on cross-border cooperation between Czechia and Austria
published online: 19. 04. 2023
Cross-border cooperation plays an important role in deepening European integration. Thanks to the existence of cross-border cooperation, border regions can overcome negative effects of the border and the adverse impact on their development, which leads to improvements in the daily lives of local residents. The Covid-19 pandemic caused an unprecedented closure of borders between most EU countries, which meant that communication between cross-border actors became more difficult and many cross-border activities were cancelled. After the first waves of the pandemic subsided, twenty interviews were conducted with mayors of Austrian municipalities in the Czech-Austrian border region. The topic of these interviews was the level of cross-border cooperation with Czech entities (municipalities, schools, societies etc.) and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on cross-border cooperation. The main findings from the interviews are that cross-border cooperation is positively evaluated. More than half of the mayors see cross-border cooperation as slightly increasing in recent years and about a fifth as decreasing or not developing. The main obstacles to cross-border cooperation are bureaucracy and language barriers. There are many joint activities in the border area, some of them have a long tradition and take place every year. Due to the border closure, the organisation of these activities was first postponed and then cancelled in 2020. On a positive note, according to the mayors, most of the cross-border events were already taking place in 2021. It can be concluded, that the pandemic caused a one-year gap in cross-border activities.
keywords: borders; cross-border cooperation; Czech-Austrian borderland; Covid-19
1. Böhm, H. (2021): The influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on Czech-Polish cross-border cooperation: From debordering to re-bordering? Moravian Geographical Reports 29(2), 137-148. CrossRef
2. Böhm, H., Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2019): Can Cross-Border Healthcare Be Sustainable? An Example from the Czech-Austrian Borderland. Sustainability 11(24), 6980. CrossRef
3. Brunet-Jailly, E., Vallet, E. (2020): Global talks border. COVID-19 and Border, https://ca.bbcollab.com/collab/ui/session/playback (accessed on 22 May 2022).
4. Casaglia, A., Scott, J. W. (2020): The pandemic is a border-making phenomenon that operates politically, socially, socio-economically and culturally at different levels. In: Scott, J. W. (ed.): Cross-border review 2020, Central European Service for Cross-border Inititatives, Budapest.
5. Cross-border cooperation in the EU 2020, https://ec.europe.eu/regional_policy/en (accessed on 12 June 2022).
6. Del Bianco, D. (2006): Cross-border cooperation as a tool for trans-national integration and conflict resolution: The Upper Adriatic Euroregional experiences, Narodna umjetnost 43(1), 75-88, https://hrcak.srce.hr/23182.
7. Espinoza, B., Castillo-Chavez, C., Perrings, C. (2020): Mobility restrictions for the control of epidemics: When do they work? PLoS ONE 15(7): e0235731. CrossRef
8. Havlíček, T. (2005): Pohraničí a periferie v regionálním rozvoji: příklad českého pohraničí, dizertační práce, UK, Praha (in Czech).
9. Havlíček, T., Jeřábek M., Dokoupil, J., eds. (2018): Borders in Central Europe after Schengen Agreement. Springer Verlag, Cham. CrossRef
10. Heintel, M., Weixlbaimer, N. (2002): Die österreichische Ostgrenze - Wahrnehmung und Wirklichkeit. Geographische Rundschau 54(9), 18-24 (in German).
11. Jeřábek, M., Dokoupil, J., Havlíček, T. et al. (2004): České pohraničí - bariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Praha (in Czech).
12. Jurczek, P. (2006): Grenzrӓume in Deutschland. Grenzuberschreitende Entwicklung
13. und grenzubergreifende Kooperation. Europa Regional 14(4), 50-60 (in German).
14. Kowalke, H. (2012): Offene Grenzen: Auswirkungen in der sächsisch-böhmischen
15. Grenzregion. Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem, Acta Universitatis Purkynianae.
16. Klatt, M. (2020): The Danish-German border in times of Covid-19. Borders in Globalization Review 2(1), 70-73. CrossRef
17. Martinez, O. D. (1994): The dynamics of border interaction. In: Schofield, C. H. (ed.) Global boundaries, Routledge, New York.
18. Národní pandemický alarm, https://nationalpandemicalarm.eu (accessed on 9 April 2022).
19. Perkmann, M. (2003): Cross-border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of cross-border cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies 10(2), 153-171. CrossRef
20. Ramírez, M. G. (2020): The Effects of the Pandemic in Border Regions, CESCI, Budapest.
21. Scott, J. W. (2012): European Politics of Borders, Border Symbolism and Cross - Border Cooperation. In: Wilson, T. M., Hastings, D., A Companion to Border Studies, Wiley Blackwell. CrossRef
22. Šindelář, M. (2019): Case study of Czech/Slovak-Austrian borderland on the territory of the Pomoraví Euroregion. In: Scott, J. W. (ed.): Cross-border review 2019, CESCI, Budapest.
23. Šindelář, M. (2020): Situační analýza přeshraniční spolupráce mezi Českem, Slovenskem a Rakouskem. In: Semotanová, E. (ed.): Hranice v krajinách, Academia, Praha, 266-293 (in Czech).
24. Weixlbaumer, N. (2005): (Ost)Grenze - vom Wirklichkeits- zum Möglichkeitsraum. In: Jungmeier, M., Pichler-Koban, Ch., Drapela, J. (eds): Grenzlandschaft/EU-Erweiterung und Landschaftsentwicklung, Klagenfurt (in German).
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on cross-border cooperation between Czechia and Austria is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
210 x 297 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 200 czk