AUC GEOGRAPHICA

Lowland riverine protected areas in Czechia are relatively rare and threatened by anthropogenic pressure. In the Moravian region, two protected landscape areas (PLAs), Litovelské Pomoraví and Poodří, were established in the early 1990s. In 2025, the Soutok (Confluence) PLA was designated. This article compares these three areas based on landscape characteristics (land cover, watercourse length, landscape fragmentation and connectivity, anthropogenic pressure, and priorities for protection) to evaluate how Soutok compares to the established two. The analysis includes a 3km buffer area. A marked contrast exists between the PLAs and their buffers; while the PLAs are largely natural or semi-natural with an increasing proportion of forests (especially Litovelské Pomoraví and Soutok) or permanent grasslands, arable land and built-up areas dominate adjacent areas. This land-use intensification causes landscape fragmentation, creating a crucial limitation for landscape connectivity. Therefore, nature protection priorities are concentrated along the watercourses, which remain relatively natural in the PLAs (with a slight decrease in naturalness in Litovelské Pomoraví and Soutok, and an increase in Poodří), but channelized, regulated, and shortened in adjacent areas. Positive changes are evident within the two PLAs designated in the 1990s; Soutok shares similar traits with Litovelské Pomoraví, which may indicate a relatively positive future for this new PLA.

1. Czech National Council (1992): Act No. 114/1992 Coll., on Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection; Czech National Council: Prague, Czech Republic.

2. Chytrý, M., Kučera, T., Kočí, M., Grulich, V., Lustyk, P. (Eds.) (2010): Katalog biotopů České republiky [Habitat Catalogue of the Czech Republic]; Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR: Praha, Czech Republic.

3. Divíšek, J., Chytrý, M. (2018): High-resolution and large-extent mapping of plant species richness using vegetation-plot databases. Ecological Indicators 89, 840-851. CrossRef

4. Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., Yates, C. J. (2011): A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17(1), 43-57. CrossRef

5. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, Sundseth, K. (2015): The EU birds and habitats directives - For nature and people in Europe. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7230759d-f136-44ae-9715-1eacc26a11af/language-en (accessed on 8 July 2025).

6. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment (2021): EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/31e4609f-b91e-11eb-8aca-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 8 July 2025).

7. Forman, R. T. T., Sperling, D., Bissonette, J. A., Clevenger, A. P., Cutshall, C. D., Dale, V. H., Fahrig, L., France, R., Goldman, C. R., Heanue, K., Jones, J. A., Swanson, F. J., Turrentine, T., Winter, T. C. (2003): Road Ecology. Science and Solutions; Island Press: Covelo, CA.

8. de la Fuente, B., Bertzky, B., Delli, G., Mandrici, A., Conti, M., Florczyk, A., Freire, S., Schiavina, M., Bastin, L., Dubois, G. (2020): Built-up areas within and around protected areas: Global patterns and 40-years trends. Global Ecology and Conservation 24: e01291. CrossRef PubMed PubMed Central

9. Gimmi, U., Schmidt, S. L., Hawbaker, T. J., Alcántara, C., Gafvert, U., Radeloff, V. C. (2011): Increasing development in the surrounding of U.S. National Park Service holdings jeopardizes park effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Management 92(1), 229-239. CrossRef PubMed

10. Girvetz, E. H., Thorne, J. H., Berry, A. M., Jaeger, J. A. G. (2008): Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 86(3-4), 205-218. CrossRef

11. Grygar, T., Světlík, I., Lisá, L., Koptíková, L., Bajer, A., Wray, D. S., Ettler, V., Mihaljevič, M., Nováková, T., Koubová, M., Novák, J., Máčka, Z., Smetana, M. (2010): Geochemical tools for the stratigraphic correlation of floodplain deposits of the Morava River in Strážnické Pomoraví, Czech Republic from the last millennium. Catena 80(2), 106-121. CrossRef

12. Hlaváč, V., Anděl, P., Pešout, P., Libosvár, T., Šikula, T., Bartonička, T., Dostál, I., Strnad, M., Uhlíková, J. (2020): Doprava a ochrana fauny v České republice. Metodika AOPK ČR; Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR: Praha, Czech Republic, 293 pp. [in Czech].

13. Hoffmann, S. (2022): Challenges and opportunities of area-based conservation in reaching biodiversity and sustainability goals. Biodiversity and Conservation 31, 325-352. CrossRef

14. Hradecký, J., Dušek, R., Velešík, M., Chudaničová, M., Škarpich, V., Jarošek, R., Lipina, J. (2016): Poodří - Landscape of Ponds and a Preserved Meander Belt of the Odra River. In Pánek, T., Hradecký, J. (Eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of the Czech Republic. World Geomorphological Landscapes; Springer: Cham. CrossRef

15. Jackson, S. F., Gaston, K. J. (2008): Land use change and the dependence of national priority species on protected areas. Global Change Biology 14(9), 2132-2138. CrossRef

16. Jaeger, J. A. G. (2000): Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 15, 115-130. CrossRef

17. Janík, T., Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Borovec, R., Romportl, D. (2024a): Landscape changes in Czech large protected areas 1950−2020: Two different landscapes types on the same path. Journal for Nature Conservation 81: 126705. CrossRef

18. Janík, T., Zýka, V., Demková, K., Havlíček, M., Borovec, R., Lichová, A., Mrkvová, B., Romportl, D. (2024b): Anthropogenic pressure in Czech protected areas over the last 60 years: A concerning increase. Landscape and Urban Planning 250: 105146. CrossRef

19. Jones, K. R., Venter, O., Fuller, J. R., Allan, J. R., Maxwell, S. L., Negret, P. J., Watson, J. E. (2018): One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360(6390), 788-791. CrossRef PubMed

20. Kilianová, H., Pechanec, V., Brus, J., Kirchner, K., Machar, I. (2017): Analysis of the development of land use in the Morava River floodplain, with special emphasis on the landscape matrix. Moravian Geographical Reports 25(1), 46-59. CrossRef

21. Kubacka, M., Zywica, P., Subirós, J. V., Bródka, S., Macias, A. (2022): How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries. Land Use Policy 113: 105910. CrossRef

22. Lehtomäki, J., Moilanen, A. (2013): Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environmental Modelling & Software 47, 128-137. CrossRef

23. Mácha, P., Červenka, R., Tlapáková, L. (2023): The challenges and possibilities in the reconstruction of non-forest woody vegetation: A case study of the hermit beetle microhabitat in the Poodří region, Czechia. Applied Geography 150: 102827. CrossRef

24. Máčka, Z. (2016): Litovelské Pomoraví - Landscape Around Anastomosing River Pattern of Morava. In Pánek, T., Hradecký, J. (Eds.), Landscapes and Landforms of the Czech Republic. World Geomorphological Landscapes; Springer: Cham. CrossRef

25. Margules, C. R., Pressey, R. L. (2000): Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243-253. CrossRef PubMed

26. McRae, B. H., Kavanagh, D. M. (2011): Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy: Seattle WA. Available online: https://circuitscape.org/linkagemapper (accessed on 8 July 2025).

27. Miklín, J., Čížek, L. (2014): Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: Open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Journal for Nature Conservation 22(1), 35-41. CrossRef

28. Miklín, J., Hradecký, J. (2016): Změny struktury krajiny v oblasti soutoku Moravy a Dyje. Geografie 121(3), 368-389. CrossRef

29. Miklín, J., Smolková, V. (2011): Land use/land cover changes of the Pálava PLA and proposed Soutok PLA (Czech Republic) in 1841-2006. Moravian Geographical Reports 19(3), 15-28.

30. Mingarro, M., Lobo, J. M. (2023): European National Parks protect their surroundings but not everywhere: A study using land use/land cover dynamics derived from CORINE Land Cover data. Land Use Policy 124: 106434. CrossRef

31. Moilanen, A., Franco, A. M. A., Early, R. I., Fox, R., Wintle, B., Thomas, C. I. (2005): Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272(1575), 1885-1891. CrossRef PubMed PubMed Central

32. Moilanen, A., Kujala, H. (2006): Zonation spatial conservation planning framework and software v. 1.0, User manual; Edita: Helsinki, Finland, 126 pp.

33. Moilanen, A., Anderson, B. J., Eigenbrod, F., Heinemeyer, A., Roy, D. B., Gillings, S., Armsworth, P. R., Gaston, K. J., Thomas, C. D. (2011): Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecological Applications 21(5), 1419-1426. CrossRef PubMed

34. Moilanen, A. (2013): Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Wildlife Research 40(2), 153-162. CrossRef

35. Montgomery, D. R., Wohl, E. E. (2003): Rivers and riverine landscapes. Developments in Quaternary Sciences 1, 221-246. CrossRef

36. Moser, B., Jaeger, J. A. G., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Eiselt, B. (2007): Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology 22, 447-459. CrossRef

37. Nakládal, O., Zumr, V., Remeš, J., Macháčová, M., Pešková, V. (2022): Heritage Trees as an Important Sanctuary for Saproxylic Beetles in the Central European Landscape: A Case Study from Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic. Forests 13(7): 1128. CrossRef

38. Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Schapire, R. E. (2006): Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190(3-4), 231-259. CrossRef

39. Połedniková, Z., Holušová, A., Vaverka, L., Galia, T. (2025): Effects of policy changes in the last 80 years on LU/LC and ecosystem services: A case study of the Odra River floodplain (Czech Republic): Moravian Geographical Reports 33(2), 91-105. CrossRef

40. Romportl, D., Andreas, M., Chumanová, E., Janík, T., Mrkvová, B., Tichopádová, E., Vojta, J., Zýka, V. (2021): Metodika komplexního hodnocení druhové a habitatové diverzity v krajině ČR [Methodology for Comprehensive Assessment of Species and Habitat Diversity in the Landscape of the Czech Republic]; Výzkumný ústav pro krajinu, v. v. i.: Průhonice.

41. Šantrůčková, M., Vokoun, A., Skokanová, H., Vojta, J., Demková, K., Havlíček, M., Medková, L., Weber, M., Slach, T., Dostálek, J., Richter, P., Rozkošný, M., Fanta, V., Szabó, P. (2023): Území pravděpodobného výskytu historických kulturních krajin [The area of possible presence of historical cultural landscapes]; Výzkumný ústav pro krajinu, v. v. i.: Průhonice.

42. Tockner, K., Malard, F., Ward, J. V. (2000): An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrological processes 14(16-17), 2861-2883. CrossRef

43. Turner, W. R., Wilcove, D. S., Swain, H. M. (2006): Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species. Conservation Biology 20(6), 1657-1669. CrossRef PubMed

44. Vollering, J., Halvorsen, R., Mazzoni, S. (2019): The MIAmaxent R package: Variable transformation and model selection for species distribution models. Ecology and Evolution 9(21), 12051-12068. CrossRef PubMed PubMed Central

45. Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., Hockings, M. (2014): The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67-73. CrossRef PubMed

46. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (ČÚZK): Raster Base Map of the Czech Republic 1:10 000 (2002-2006) [online]; ČÚZK: Prague. Available online: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(axzzppw0sacvxwlksyed41c5))/Default.aspx?mode=TextMeta&side=mapy_tiskZMSM&metadataID=CZ-CUZK-ZM10-T (accessed on 8 July 2025).

47. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (ČÚZK): Archival Orthophoto of the Czech Republic (2003-2005) [online database]; ČÚZK: Prague, ©2005 WMS service. Available online: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx. (accessed on 8 July 2025).

48. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (ČÚZK): Archival Orthophoto of the Czech Republic (2016-2020) [online database]; ČÚZK: Prague, ©2020 WMS service. Available online: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx (accessed on 8 July 2025).

49. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army and Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography: Topographic maps of the Czechoslovakia in the system S-1952, scale 1:10 000 (1957-1971) [online database]; ČÚZK: Prague. Available online: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(3b1gkzfbsvxmbussczwsy2yi))/Default.aspx?mode=TextMeta&side=dSady_archiv&metadataID=CZ-CUZK-TMS52_10-R&head_tab=sekce-02-gp&menu=2908 (accessed on 8 July 2025).

50. Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography: Base maps of Czechoslovakia, scale 1:10 000 (1986-1995).

51. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army: Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25 000 (1952-1956) [online]; ČÚZK: Prague. Available online: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(0csgh2l0tdj4lwobyer4sf3w))/Default.aspx?mode=TextMeta&side=dSady_archiv&metadataID=CZ-CUZK-TMS52_25-R&head_tab=sekce-02-gp&menu=2909 (accessed on 8 July 2025).

52. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army: Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25 000 (1988-1995); ČÚZK: Prague.

53. Ministry of Agriculture: Land Parcel Information System (2016-2020); Ministry of Agriculture: Prague. Available online: https://eagri.cz/public/app/lpisext/lpis/verejny2/plpis/ [online database] (accessed on 8 July 2025).

54. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Consolidated layer of ecosystems of the Czech Republic (2013); Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Prague. Available online: https://data.nature.cz/ds/27 [online database] (accessed on 8 July 2025).

55. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Nálezová databáze ochrany přírody [National Database of Fauna-Flora Records] (2022a); Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Prague. Available online: https://portal23.nature.cz/nd/ [online database] (accessed on 4 January 2022).

56. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Habitat mapping layers (2022b); Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic: Prague. Available online: https://data.nature.cz/sds/7 [online database] (accessed on 4 January 2022).

57. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute: ISVS Evidence množství povrchových vod [Recording of surface water quantities] (2026); Czech Hydrometeorological Institute: Prague. Available online: https://isvs.chmi.cz/ords/f?p=11002:HOME:13429975927986 [online database] (accessed on 6 March 2026).

58. Vrška, T., Hort, L., Adam, D. (2023): Layer of natural forests; Landscape Research Institute: Brno. Available online: https://pralesy.cz/databanka-prirozenych-lesu [online database] (accessed on 6 February 2023).