AUC GEOGRAPHICA

AUC GEOGRAPHICA

We are pleased to share that AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.5 in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2024. AUC Geographica ranks in Q3 in the field of Geography.

AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.

AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.

Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31

All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.

AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).

The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
https://www.scopus.com/source/sourceInfo.uri?sourceId=27100&origin=recordpage

The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.

The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.

Journal metrics 2023

Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.5
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.20
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography

Scopus
Cite Score: 1.2
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences

The journal is archived in Portico.

AUC GEOGRAPHICA, 1–13

Tele-effect of geomorphological change on the spatial variability of the precision of SfM-MVS 3D point-cloud models

Miao Zhang, Christopher Gomez, Norifumi Hotta, Rikuto Daikai, Sho Sawada, Balazs Bradak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2025.6
published online: 24. 03. 2025

abstract

Earth-surface processes research is increasingly using the SfM-MVS (Structure from Motion and Multiple-View Stereophotogrammetry) method to model land surface change over time at a very fine-scale. However, the role of topographic change on the error calculated from “stable and fixed” Ground Control Points is under-documented and as far as the authors are aware, it has not been evaluated as yet. Therefore, the present study is an analysis of the variability inherent to the SfM-MVS method used for 3D terrain modeling, in a semi-controlled environment, comparing repeats of measurements, and repeats including topographic change in the laboratory scene, in order to assess the role of elevation change in the scene on the space that remains unchanged. The methodological framework involves varying the terrain morphology by adding 50 and 100 ml of sand to an originally horizontal sandbox, creating a mount in the centre. Then, the authors compared the different experimental surfaces and their repeats acquired by SfM-MVS, and using Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation (KDE). Results demonstrated that under stable and uniform flat surface conditions, the SfM method yields relatively consistent results (standard deviation variety less than 0.027 mm). However, when the experiments included the 50 ml and 100 ml mount of sand, the variability between repeats increased, even for location where no topographic change had occurred. The authors argue that the topographic variability is spreading the error, increasing it compared to the flat experiment. By extension, this consideration is essential, especially for research investigating topographic change such as landslide and other erosion and deposition processes, because the error propagation varies with the surface change, and relating erosion/deposition to topographic change needs to be done carefully.

keywords: geomorphologic change; point cloud; structure from motion; precision variability; terrain modeling

references (65)

1. Bakker, M., Lane, S. N. (2017): Archival photogrammetric analysis of river-floodplain systems using Structure from Motion (SfM) methods. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 42(8), 1274-1286. CrossRef

2. Bi, R., Gan, S., Yuan, X., Li, R., Gao, S., Yang, M., Luo, W., Hu, L. (2023): Multi-View Analysis of High-Resolution Geomorphic Features in Complex Mountains Based on UAV-LiDAR and SfM-MVS: A Case Study of the Northern Pit Rim Structure of the Mountains of Lufeng, China. Applied Sciences 13(2): 738. CrossRef

3. Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Bösch, R., Stoffel, A. (2016): Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations. Cryosphere 10(3), 1075-1088. CrossRef

4. Clark, A., Moorman, B., Whalen, D., Fraser, P. (2021): Arctic coastal erosion: UAV-SfM data collection strategies for planimetric and volumetric measurements. Arctic Science 7(3), 605-633. CrossRef

5. Cucchiaro, S., Maset, E., Cavalli, M., Crema, S., Marchi, L., Beinat, A., Cazorzi, F. (2020): How does co-registration affect geomorphic change estimates in multi-temporal surveys? GIScience and Remote Sensing 57(5), 611-632. CrossRef

6. De Reu, J., De Smedt, P., Herremans, D., Van Meirvenne, M., Laloo, P., De Clercq, W. (2014): On introducing an image-based 3D reconstruction method in archaeological excavation practice. Journal of Archaeological Science 41, 251-262. CrossRef

7. De Reu, J., Plets, G., Verhoeven, G., De Smedt, P., Bats, M., Cherretté, B., De Maeyer, W., Deconynck, J., Herremans, D., Laloo, P., Van Meirvenne, M., De Clercq, W. (2013): Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(2), 1108-1121. CrossRef

8. Deliry, S. I., Avdan, U. (2021): Accuracy of unmanned aerial systems photogrammetry and structure from motion in surveying and mapping: a review. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 49(8), 1997-2017. CrossRef

9. Eckert-Gallup, A., Martin, N. (2016): Kernel density estimation (KDE) with adaptive bandwidth selection for environmental contours of extreme sea states. OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, CA, USA, 1-5. CrossRef

10. Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Castillo, C., Rock, G., Neugirg, F., Abellán, A. (2016): Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - merits, limits and developments. Earth Surface Dynamics 4(2), 359-389. CrossRef

11. Fabris, M. (2021): Monitoring the coastal changes of the Po River delta (Northern Italy) since 1911 using archival cartography, multi-temporal aerial photogrammetry and LiDAR data: Implications for coastline changes in 2100 AD. Remote Sensing 13(3): 529. CrossRef

12. Fonstad, M. A., Dietrich, J. T., Courville, B. C., Jensen, J. L., Carbonneau, P. E. (2013): Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(4), 421-430. CrossRef

13. Furukawa, Y., Ponce, J. (2009): Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32(8), 1362-1376. CrossRef

14. Gallup, D., Frahm, J. M., Mordohai, P., Yang, Q., Pollefeys, M. (2007): Real-time plane-sweeping stereo with multiple sweeping directions. In 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1-8. CrossRef

15. Gomez, C. (2012): Historical 3D topographic reconstruction of the Iwaki Volcano using structure from motion from uncalibrated aerial photographs. HAL science ouverte: hal-00765723, version 1. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00765723 (accessed on 5. 1. 2024).

16. Gomez, C. (2014): Digital photogrammetry and GIS-based analysis of the bio-geomorphological evolution of Sakurajima Volcano, diachronic analysis from 1947 to 2006. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal 280, 1-13. CrossRef

17. Gomez, C. (2022): Point Cloud Technologies for Geomorphologists: From Data Acquisition to Processing. Springer Nature, Switzerland. CrossRef

18. Gomez, C., Hayakawa, Y., Obanawa, H. (2015): A study of Japanese landscapes using structure from motion derived DSMs and DEMs based on historical aerial photographs: New opportunities for vegetation monitoring and diachronic geomorphology. Geomorphology 242. CrossRef

19. Gomez, C., Liu, J., Wu, J., Persendt, F., Bradak, B., Saleh, Y., Hadmoko, D. S. (2023): Improving vegetation spatial distribution mapping in arid and on coastal dune systems using GPR in Tottori Prefecture (Japan). AUC Geographica 58(2), 238-249. CrossRef

20. Gomez, C., Setiawan, M. A., Listyaningrum, N., Wibowo, S. B., Hadmoko, D. S., Suryanto, W., Darmawan, H., Bradak, B., Daikai, R., Sunardi, S., Prasetyo, Y., Astari, A. J., Lukman, L., Nurani, I. W., Dede, M., Suhendro, I., Lavigne, F., Malawani, M. N. (2022): LiDAR and UAV SfM-MVS of Merapi volcanic dome and crater rim change from 2012 to 2014. Remote Sensing 14(20): 5193. CrossRef

21. Gomez, C., Shinohara, Y., Tsunetaka, H., Hotta, N., Bradak, B., Sakai, Y. (2021): Twenty-five years of geomorphological evolution in the gokurakudani gully (Unzen volcano): Topography, subsurface geophysics and sediment analysis. Geosciences 11(11): 457. CrossRef

22. Gomez, C. (2013): Tamagawa hanrangen ni okeru tochihifuku no henka to jisin no yure no kankei. Tokyo University CSIS Days 2013.

23. Groos, A. R., Bertschinger, T. J., Kummer, C. M., Erlwein, S., Munz, L., Philipp, A. (2019): The potential of low-cost UAVs and open-source photogrammetry software for high-resolution monitoring of Alpine glaciers: a case study from the Kanderfirn (Swiss Alps). Geoscience 9(8): 356. CrossRef

24. Harpole, J. K., Woods, C. M., Rodebaugh, T. L., Levinson, C. A., Lenze, E. J. (2014): How bandwidth selection algorithms impact exploratory data analysis using kernel density estimation. Psychological Methods 19(3), 428-443. CrossRef

25. Hartley, R., Zisserman, A. (2004): Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. CrossRef

26. Hayakawa, Y. S., Obanawa, H. (2020): Volumetric change detection in bedrock coastal cliffs using terrestrial laser scanning and UAS-based SfM. Sensors 20(12): 3403. CrossRef

27. Hemmelder, S., Marra, W., Markies, H., De Jong, S. M. (2018): Monitoring river morphology & bank erosion using UAV imagery - A case study of the river Buëch, Hautes-Alpes, France. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 73, 428-437. CrossRef

28. Hixon, S. W., Lipo, C. P., Hunt, T. L., Lee, C. (2018): Using Structure from Motion Mapping to Record and Analyze Details of the Colossal Hats (Pukao) of Monumental Statues on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(1), 42-57. CrossRef

29. Iheaturu, C. J., Ayodele, E. G., Okolie, C. J. (2020): An assessment of the accuracy of structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry for 3D terrain mapping. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2, 65-82. CrossRef

30. James, M. R., Robson, S. (2014): Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39(10), 1413-1420. CrossRef

31. Javernick, L., Brasington, J., Caruso, B. (2014): Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 213, 166-182. CrossRef

32. James, M. R., Robson, S. (2012): Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface 117(F3), 1-17. CrossRef

33. Kazhdan, M., Hoppe, H. (2013): Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32(3): 29. CrossRef

34. King, T. L., Bentley, R. J., Thornton, L. E., Kavanagh, A. M. (2016): Using kernel density estimation to understand the influence of neighbourhood destinations on BMI. BMJ Open 6(2): e008878. CrossRef

35. Lague, D., Brodu, N., Leroux, J. (2013): Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (NZ). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 82, 10-26. CrossRef

36. Liu, X., Lian, X., Yang, W., Wang, F., Han, Y., Zhang, Y. (2022): Accuracy assessment of a UAV direct georeferencing method and impact of the configuration of ground control points. Drones 6(2): 30. CrossRef

37. Lochhead, I., Hedley, N. (2022): Evaluating the 3D integrity of underwater structure from motion workflows. Photogrammetric Record 37(177), 35-60. CrossRef

38. Long, N., Millescamps, B., Pouget, F., Dumon, A., Lachaussee, N., Bertin, X. (2016): Accuracy assessment of coastal topography derived from UAV images. In Xxiii Isprs Congress, Commission I 41(B1), 1127-134. CrossRef

39. Lucieer, A., Jong, S. M. D., Turner, D. (2014): Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 38(1), 97-116. CrossRef

40. Matsutani, Y., Tahara, K., Kino, H. (2019): Set-point control of a musculoskeletal system under gravity by a combination of feed-forward and feedback manners considering output limitation of muscular forces. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 31(4), 612-620. CrossRef

41. Mestre-Runge, C., Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Ortega-Mclear, A., Garcia, C. (2023): An Optimized Workflow for Digital Surface Model Series Generation Based on Historical Aerial Images: Testing and Quality Assessment in the Beach-Dune System of Sa Ràpita-Es Trenc (Mallorca, Spain). Remote Sensing 15(8): 2044. CrossRef

42. Micheletti, N., Chandler, J. H., Lane, S. N. (2015): Investigating the geomorphological potential of freely available and accessible structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry using a smartphone. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(4), 473-486. CrossRef

43. Morgenroth, J., Gomez, C. (2014): Assessment of tree structure using a 3D image analysis technique - A proof of concept. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13(1), 198-203. CrossRef

44. Niederheiser, R., Rutzinger, M., Bremer, M., Wichmann, V. (2018): Dense image matching of terrestrial imagery for deriving high-resolution topographic properties of vegetation locations in alpine terrain. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 66, 146-158. CrossRef

45. Panagiotidis, D., Surový, P., Kuželka, K. (2016): Accuracy of Structure from Motion models in comparison with terrestrial laser scanner for the analysis of DBH and height influence on error behaviour. Journal of Forest Science 62(8), 357-365. CrossRef

46. Peppa, M. V., Mills, J. P., Moore, P., Miller, P. E., Chambers, J. E. (2016): Accuracy assessment of a UAV-based landslide monitoring system. ISPRS Archives 41, 895-902. CrossRef

47. Saputra, M. R. U., Markham, A., Trigoni, N. (2018): Visual SLAM and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 51(2), 1-36. CrossRef

48. Smith, M. W., Vericat, D. (2015): From experimental plots to experimental landscapes: topography, erosion and deposition in sub‐humid badlands from structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(12), 1656-1671. CrossRef

49. Szeliski, R. (2022): Computer vision: algorithms and applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland. CrossRef

50. Terefenko, P., Zelaya Wziątek, D., Dalyot, S., Boski, T., Pinheiro Lima-Filho, F. (2018): A high-precision LiDAR-based method for surveying and classifying coastal notches. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7(8): 295. CrossRef

51. Tinkham, W. T., Swayze, N. C. (2021): Influence of Agisoft Metashape parameters on UAS structure from motion individual tree detection from canopy height models. Forests 12(2): 250. CrossRef

52. Tonkin, T. N., Midgley, N. G., Graham, D. J., Labadz, J. C. (2014): The potential of small unmanned aircraft systems and structure-from-motion for topographic surveys: A test of emerging integrated approaches at Cwm Idwal, North Wales. Geomorphology 226, 35-43. CrossRef

53. Tsunetaka, H., Hotta, N., Hayakawa, Y. S., Imaizumi, F. (2020): Spatial accuracy assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle-based structures from motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry for geomorphic observations in initiation zones of debris flows, Ohya landslide, Japan. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 7, 1-14. CrossRef

54. Tsunetaka, H., Shinohara, Y., Hotta, N., Gomez, C., Sakai, Y. (2021): Multi‐decadal changes in the relationships between rainfall characteristics and debris‐flow occurrences in response to gully evolution after the 1990-1995 Mount Unzen eruptions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46(11), 2141-2162. CrossRef

55. Verhoeven, G. (2011): Taking computer vision aloft - archaeological three‐dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with photoscan. Archaeological Prospection 18(1), 67-73. CrossRef

56. Vestal, B. E., Carlson, N. E., Ghosh, D. (2021): Filtering spatial point patterns using kernel densities. Spatial Statistics 41: 100487. CrossRef

57. Wang, J., Shi, F., Zhang, J., Liu, Y. (2008): A new calibration model of camera lens distortion. Pattern Recognition 41(2), 607-615. CrossRef

58. Wang, L., Liu, G. (2022): Three Camera Lens Distortion Correction Models and Its Application. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing Zhoushan, China, 462-467. CrossRef

59. Wei, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, C., Tomás, R., Jiang, Z. (2021): Observation of surface displacement associated with rapid urbanization and land creation in Lanzhou, Loess Plateau of China with Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery. Remote Sensing 13(17): 3472. CrossRef

60. Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., Reynolds, J. M. (2012): Structure-from-Motion' photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179, 300-314. CrossRef

61. Woodget, A. S., Carbonneau, P. E., Visser, F., Maddock, I. P. (2015): Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(1), 47-64. CrossRef

62. Zaman, F., Wong, Y. P., Ng, B. Y. (2017): Density-based denoising of point cloud. In 9th International Conference on Robotic, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 398, 287-295. Springer Singapore. CrossRef

63. Zambom, A. Z., Dias, R. (2013): A review of kernel density estimation with applications to econometrics. International Economic Review 5(1), 20-42.

64. Zhang, Y., Li, C., Guo, B., Guo, C., Zhang, S. (2021): KDD: A kernel density based descriptor for 3D point clouds. Pattern Recognition 111: 107691. CrossRef

65. Zhao, Q., Gao, X., Li, J., Luo, L. (2021): Optimization algorithm for point cloud quality enhancement based on statistical filtering. Journal of Sensors 2021(1): 7325600. CrossRef

Creative Commons License
Tele-effect of geomorphological change on the spatial variability of the precision of SfM-MVS 3D point-cloud models is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

210 x 297 mm
periodicity: 2 x per year
print price: 200 czk
ISSN: 0300-5402
E-ISSN: 2336-1980

Download