Oznamujeme autorům a čtenářům, že po dohodě s nakladatelstvím Karolinum bude od roku 2024 (ročník 18) časopis Orbis scholae vycházet pouze v elektronické podobě.
Orbis scholae je odborný recenzovaný časopis zaměřený na problematiku školního vzdělávání v jeho širších sociokulturních souvislostech. Cílem časopisu je přispět k porozumění školnímu vzdělávání a jeho rozvoji, k řešení problémů praxe a vzdělávací politiky.
Časopis je zařazen do databází SCOPUS, CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO a ERIH Plus.
ORBIS SCHOLAE, Vol 16 No 2 (2022), 137–156
The Recording, Reporting, and Use of School Attendance Data by School Personnel in The Netherlands: Toe the Line or Take a New Path?
Evelyne Karel, David Heyne, Marga de Weerd, Rene Halberstadt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2022.16
zveřejněno: 19. 12. 2022
Abstract
Research signals the importance of promptly identifying and responding to emerging absenteeism, to prevent severe and chronic absenteeism. Prompt identification and response relies upon a good system for recording, reporting, and using data related to students’ school attendance and absence. The current article provides an overview of law, policy, and practice in the Netherlands regarding the recording, reporting, and use of school attendance data. We then consider the ways in which current law, policy, and practice help and hinder the work of school personnel as they endeavour to promote attendance and reduce absenteeism. Thereafter, we propose modifications to current policy and practice that could enhance the prompt identification and response to emerging absenteeism. When school personnel have easy access to reliable attendance data, and when they become accustomed to using the data to inform their work to promote attendance and respond to absenteeism, they are in a stronger position to support positive developmental outcomes among young people.
klíčová slova: school attendance data; school absenteeism; policy; practice; reporting; school personnel; The Netherlands
reference (58)
1. Allison, M. A., & Attisha, E. (2019). The link between school attendance and good health. Pediatrics, 143(2), Article e20183648.
2. Birioukov, A. (2016). Beyond the excused/unexcused absence binary: Classifying absenteeism through a voluntary/involuntary absence framework. Educational Review, 68, 340−357.
3. Brouwer-Borghuis, M., Heyne, D. A., Sauter, F. M., & Scholte, R. H. J. (2019). The Link: An alternative educational program in the Netherlands to reengage school-refusing adolescents with schooling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 75−91.
4. Brouwer-Borghuis, M. L., Heyne, D. A., Vogelaar, B., & Sauter, F. M. (2019). Early identification of school attendance problems: How helpful are Dutch laws, policies, and protocols? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(1), 47−62.
5. Carroll, H. C. (2010). The effect of pupil absenteeism on literacy and numeracy in the primary school. School Psychology International, 31(2), 115−130.
6. Chu, B. C. (2021). Building early detection systems to prevent chronic absenteeism. In M. Gren Landell (Ed.), School attendance problems: A research update and where to go (pp. 125−137). Jerringfonden.
7. Chu, B. C., Guarino, D., Mele, C., O’Connell, J., & Coto, P. (2019). Developing an online early detection system for school attendance problems: Results from a research-community partnership. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26, 35−45.
8. Dannow, M. C., Esbjørn, B. H., & Risom, S. W. (2020). The perceptions of anxiety-related school absenteeism in youth: A qualitative study involving youth, mother, and father. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64, 22−36.
9. Dienst Uitvoering Onderwijs. (n.d.-a). Soorten verzuim. https://duo.nl/zakelijk/verzuim/verzuim/soorten-verzuim.jsp
10. Dienst Uitvoering Onderwijs. (n.d.-b). Verzuim − Vragen coronamaatregelen. https://duo.nl/zakelijk/maatregelen-corona/verzuim.jsp
11. Dienst Uitvoering Onderwijs. (2019, July). Onderzoek Lerarentekort. https://www.poraad.nl/system/files/werkgeverszaken/rapport_po-raad_-_onderzoek_lerarentekort_2019.pdf
12. Evans, L. D. (2000). Functional school refusal subtypes: Anxiety, avoidance, and malingering. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 183−191.
13. Finning, K., Harvey, K., Moore, D., Ford, T., Davis, B., & Waite, P. (2018). Secondary school educational practitioners’ experiences of school attendance problems and interventions to address them: A qualitative study. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 23, 213−225.
14. Gottfried, M. A. (2011). The detrimental effects of missing school: Evidence from urban siblings. American Journal of Education, 117(2), 147−182.
15. Gottfried, M. A. (2014). Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2), 53−75.
16. Gottfried, M. A., & Hutt, E. L. (2019). Introduction. In M. A. Gottfried & E. L. Hutt (Eds.), Absent from school: Understanding and addressing student absenteeism (pp. 1−12). Harvard Education Press.
17. Havik, T., Bru, E., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2015). Assessing reasons for school non-attendance. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(3), 316−336.
18. Havik, T. (2021). School-related risk factors. In M. Gren Landell (Ed.), School attendance problems: A research update and where to go (pp. 125−137). Jerringfonden.
19. Heyne, D., Kearney, C., & Finning, K. (2022). Mental health and attendance at school: Setting the scene. In K. Finning, T. Ford, & D. A. Moore (Eds.), Mental health and attendance at school (pp. 1−21). Cambridge University Press.
20. Heyne, D., Gren-Landell, M., Melvin, G., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2019). Differentiation between school attendance problems: Why and how? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 8−34.
21. Heyne, D., & Sauter, F. M. (2013). School refusal. In C. A. Essau, & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the treatment of childhood and adolescent anxiety (pp. 471−517). Wiley.
22. Heyne, D., Sauter, F. M., & Maynard, B. R. (2015). Moderators and mediators of treatments for youth with school refusal or truancy. In M. Maric, P. J. M. Prins, & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), Moderators and mediators of youth treatment outcomes (pp. 230−266). Oxford University Press.
23. Ingrado. (2020, October). Handreiking aanwezigheidsregistratie: van registreren van verzuim naar registreren van aanwezigheid. https://ingrado.nl//media/files/kennisbank/aanwezigheid_in_het_onderwijs/verzuim_18_min/praktijk_en_instrumenten/handreiking_aanwezigheidsregistratie.pdf
24. Inspectie van het onderwijs. (2017, July). Onderzoekskader NBO PO. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/onderwijssectoren/particulier-onderwijs/documenten/publicaties/2017/07/26/onderzoekskader-2017-nbo-po
25. Inspectie van het onderwijs. (2021, April). Technisch rapport niet-bekostigd onderwijs. De staat van het onderwijs 2021. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2021/04/14/technisch-rapport-niet-bekostigd-onderwijs-svho-2021
26. Inspectie van het onderwijs. (2022). De staat van het onderwijs 2022. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2022/04/13/de-staat-van-het-onderwijs-2022
27. Kearney, C. A. (2003). Bridging the gap among professionals who address youths with school absenteeism: Overview and suggestions for consensus. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 57−65.
28. Kearney, C. A. (2008). An interdisciplinary model of school absenteeism in youth to inform professional practice and public policy. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 257−282.
29. Kearney, C. A. (2016). Managing school absenteeism at multiple tiers: An evidence-based and practical guide for professionals. Oxford University Press.
30. Kearney, C. A., & Graczyk, P. A. (2020). A multidimensional, multi-tiered system of supports model to promote school attendance and address school absenteeism. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(3), 316−337.
31. Keppens, G., Spruyt, B., & Dockx, J. (2019). Measuring school absenteeism: Administrative attendance data collected by schools differ from self-reports in systematic ways. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
32. Keppens, G., & Johnsen, D. B. (2021). The power of school attendance data: improving policy and practice. In M. Gren Landell (Ed.), School attendance problems: A research update and where to go (pp. 125−137). Jerringfonden.
33. Ledoux, G., Waslander, S., & Eimers, T. (2020, May). Evaluatie passend onderwijs. Eindrapport mei 2020. Kohnstamm Instituut. https://open.overheid.nl/repository/ronl-086f885a-1046-4421-886f-0be22151d4cc/1/pdf/evaluatie-passend-onderwijs-nro-eindrapport-mei-2020.pdf
34. Leerplichtwet 1969 (2021, August 1). https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0002628/2021-08-01
35. Lubberman, J., Mommers, A., & Wester, M. (2014). Leerlingverzuim in beeld. Een studie naar de cijfers en registratie van absoluut en relatief verzuim. ITS Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
36. Malcolm, H., Wilson, V., Davidson, J., & Kirk, S. (2003). Absence from school: A study of its causes and effects in seven LEAs. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 188−196.
37. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-a). Doelen passend onderwijs. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/passend-onderwijs/doelen-passend-onderwijs
38. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-b). Geoorloofd schoolverzuim en spijbelen. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/leerplicht/geoorloofd-schoolverzuim-en-spijbelen
39. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-c). Leerplicht en kwalificatieplicht. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/leerplicht/leerplicht-en-kwalificatieplicht
40. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-d). Rapportage leerplichtwet G-gemeenten, schooljaar 2019−2020, Definitieve eindstand. https://open.overheid.nl/repository/ronl-5ba469c7-a89e-4175-aa60-41c6f5ae007b/1/pdf/bijlage-i-verzuimcijfers.pdf
41. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.). Rapportages − Verzuim − DUO Zakelijk. https://duo.nl/zakelijk/verzuim/verzuim/rapportages.jsp
42. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-e). Zorgplicht en samenwerken scholen in passend onderwijs. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/passend-onderwijs/zorgplicht-en-samenwerken-scholen-passend-onderwijsverantwoordelijkheid-van-de-scholen
43. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-f). Wanneer hoeft mijn kind niet naar school? https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/leerplicht/vraag-en-antwoord/leerplicht-kind-niet-naar-school
44. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-g). Onderwijs en zorg. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/passend-onderwijs/onderwijs-en-zorg
45. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (n.d.-h). Schematische weergave Nederlands onderwijsstelsel. https://www.ocwincijfers.nl/sectoren/onderwijs-algemeen/schooltypen/schooltypen
46. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2006, April). Kerndoelenboekje basisonderwijs. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2006/04/28/kerndoelenboekje
47. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2020, August). Registreren en melden van ongeoorloofd verzuim. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/onderwerpen/registreren-en-melden-van-ongeoorloofd-verzuim
48. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2021a, February 24). Kamerbrief over verzuim schooljaar 2019−2020. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/leerplicht/documenten/kamerstukken/2021/02/24/brief-aan-de-tweede-kamer-inzake-verzuim-schooljaar-2019-2020
49. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2021b, June 22). Eerste Kamer stemt in met nieuwe wet voor burgerschapsonderwijs. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/06/22/eerste-kamer-stemt-in-met-nieuwe-wet-voor-burgerschapsonderwijs
50. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2021c, July 7). Overzicht aantal uren onderwijstijd. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/schooltijden-en-onderwijstijd/overzicht-aantal-uren-onderwijstijd
51. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2022, March 29). Kamerbrief over verzuimcijfers 2020−2021 en verzuimaanpak. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2022/03/28/verzuimcijfers-2020-2021-en-verzuimaanpak
52. Panayiotou, M., Finning, K., Hennessey, A., Ford, T., & Humphrey, N. (2021). Longitudinal pathways between emotional difficulties and school absenteeism in middle childhood: Evidence from developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology. Advance online publication.
53. Pijl, E. K., Vanneste, Y. T. M., Feron, F. J. M., Mathijssen, J. J. P., & De Rijk, A. E. (2021). Stakeholder perspectives on primary school pupils and sickness absence: Exploring opportunities and challenges. Educational Review. Advance online publication.
54. Roelofs, M., Kennis, R., Beurskens, K., & Eimers, T. (2021). Ziekteverzuim en kortdurend ongeoorloofd verzuim in het onderwijs: Kwantitatief en kwalitatief onderzoek in primair, voortgezet en (voortgezet) speciaal onderwijs. KBA Nijmegen. https://www.kbanijmegen.nl/Ziekteverzuim_en_kortdurend_ongeoorloofd_verzuim_in_het_onderwijs.pdf
55. Thastum, M., Johnsen, D. B., Silverman, W. K., Jeppesen, P., Heyne, D. A., & Lomholt, J. J. (2019). The Back2School modular cognitive behavioral intervention for youths with problematic school absenteeism: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 20(1).
56. Wet register onderwijsdeelnemers. (2021, October 1). Wetten.overheid.nl. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0042012/2021-10-01
57. Witteman-van Leenen, H., van der Wel, J., Arrahmani, F., & Lubberman, J. (2017, November). Toezicht naleving leerplichtwet door scholen (No. 17087). Regioplan beleidsonderzoek. https://www.regioplan.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/17087-Toezicht-naleving-Leerplichtwet-door-scholen-Regioplan.pdf
58. Zhang, M. (2003). Links between school absenteeism and child poverty. Pastoral Care in Education, 21, 10–17.
The Recording, Reporting, and Use of School Attendance Data by School Personnel in The Netherlands: Toe the Line or Take a New Path? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
157 x 230 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177